Literature DB >> 30747565

Acute Effects of Gastrocnemius/Soleus Self-Myofascial Release Versus Dynamic Stretching on Closed-Chain Dorsiflexion.

Kimberly Somers, Dustin Aune, Anthony Horten, James Kim, Julia Rogers.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Limited ankle dorsiflexion (DF) range of motion has been correlated with decreased flexibility of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex. Decreased ankle DF range of motion can lead to an increase in lower-extremity injuries, for example, acute ankle sprains, Achilles tendinopathy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a single application of the intervention to the gastrocnemius/soleus complex via multidirectional self-myofascial release using a foam roller, multiplanar dynamic stretch performed in downward dog, or a combination of both techniques acutely improved ankle DF.
DESIGN: Subjects were assigned to groups via random card selection. Investigators provided verbal cues as needed to yield correct performance of interventions. Both interventions were performed twice for 1 minute using a dynamic walking rest of 30.48 m at a self-selected pace between interventions. Statistical analyses were completed using a 1-way analysis of variance, at α level ≤ .05.
SETTING: A convenience sample study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 42 asymptomatic physical therapy students (18 females and 24 males) with mean age of 26.12 (4.03) years volunteered to participate.
INTERVENTIONS: Multidirectional self-myofascial release using a foam roller, multiplanar dynamic stretch performed in downward dog, or a combination of both techniques. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight-bearing right ankle DF measurements were recorded in centimeters using a forward lunge technique (intraclass correlation coefficient = .98, .97, and .96).
RESULTS: Data analysis revealed no significant difference between the 3 groups in all pre-post measurements (P = .82). Mean (SD) measurements from pretest to posttest for myofascial release, dynamic stretching, and combination interventions were 0.479 (0.7) cm, 0.700 (0.7) cm, and 0.907 (1.4) cm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Until further studies are conducted, the selection of technique to increase ankle DF range of motion should be based on each individual patient's ability, preference, and response to treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle; downward dog; flexibility; foam rolling; range of motion

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30747565     DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sport Rehabil        ISSN: 1056-6716            Impact factor:   1.931


  4 in total

Review 1.  The Accumulated Effects of Foam Rolling Combined with Stretching on Range of Motion and Physical Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Konrad; Masatoshi Nakamura; Daniel Bernsteiner; Markus Tilp
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Acute Effects of Foam Rolling on Range of Motion in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review with Multilevel Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jan Wilke; Anna-Lena Müller; Florian Giesche; Gerard Power; Hamid Ahmedi; David G Behm
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Reliability of shear wave elastography for the assessment of gastrocnemius fascia elasticity in healthy individual.

Authors:  Jiping Zhou; Yuyi Lin; Jiehong Zhang; Xingxian Si'tu; Ji Wang; Weiyi Pan; Yulong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  A comparison of a single bout of stretching or foam rolling on range of motion in healthy adults.

Authors:  Andreas Konrad; Masatoshi Nakamura; Florian K Paternoster; Markus Tilp; David G Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.346

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.