Till Utesch1, Farid Bardid2,3, Dirk Büsch4, Bernd Strauss5. 1. Department of Sport Psychology, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 49149, Münster, Germany. till.utesch@uni-muenster.de. 2. School of Education, University of Strathclyde, 141 St James Road, Glasgow, G4 0LT, Scotland, UK. 3. Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. 4. Arbeitsbereich Sport und Training, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Institut für Sportwissenschaft, Uhlhornsweg 49-55, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany. 5. Department of Sport Psychology, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 49149, Münster, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Motor competence and physical fitness are important factors for promoting positive trajectories of health over time. In 2008, Stodden and colleagues developed a model that discussed the role of both factors in physical activity. Furthermore, the authors hypothesized that the relationship between motor competence and physical fitness is reciprocal and changes over time. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present meta-analysis was to synthesize the evidence on the relationship between motor competence and components of physical fitness from early childhood to early adulthood and the potential influence of age. METHODS: Scientific databases Web of Science and PubMed were used for the literature search. German- as well as English-language studies were included that assessed typically developing children. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, 93 studies between 2005 and June 2018 were screened in full. Nineteen studies comprising of 32 samples, 87 single data points from 15,984 participants aged 4.5-20.4 years (Mage = 11.44, SD = 4.77) were included in the analysis. RESULTS: A random effects model was conducted for the meta-regression with age as moderator variable. The relationship between motor competence and physical fitness was moderate to large (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) after controlling for multiple effects, including dependent samples and small sample sizes in the quantitative synthesis. Additionally, age was a small significant positive moderator of the effect size. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings provide support for a moderate to large positive relationship between motor competence and physical fitness that strengthens with increasing age. However, the results also indicate that there may be an overlap in content between motor competence and physical fitness assessments, which warrants further investigation. More research is also needed to assess similarities and differences in terms of the construct structures.
BACKGROUND: Motor competence and physical fitness are important factors for promoting positive trajectories of health over time. In 2008, Stodden and colleagues developed a model that discussed the role of both factors in physical activity. Furthermore, the authors hypothesized that the relationship between motor competence and physical fitness is reciprocal and changes over time. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present meta-analysis was to synthesize the evidence on the relationship between motor competence and components of physical fitness from early childhood to early adulthood and the potential influence of age. METHODS: Scientific databases Web of Science and PubMed were used for the literature search. German- as well as English-language studies were included that assessed typically developing children. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, 93 studies between 2005 and June 2018 were screened in full. Nineteen studies comprising of 32 samples, 87 single data points from 15,984 participants aged 4.5-20.4 years (Mage = 11.44, SD = 4.77) were included in the analysis. RESULTS: A random effects model was conducted for the meta-regression with age as moderator variable. The relationship between motor competence and physical fitness was moderate to large (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) after controlling for multiple effects, including dependent samples and small sample sizes in the quantitative synthesis. Additionally, age was a small significant positive moderator of the effect size. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings provide support for a moderate to large positive relationship between motor competence and physical fitness that strengthens with increasing age. However, the results also indicate that there may be an overlap in content between motor competence and physical fitness assessments, which warrants further investigation. More research is also needed to assess similarities and differences in terms of the construct structures.
Authors: Lisa M Barnett; Eric Van Beurden; Philip J Morgan; Lyndon O Brooks; John R Beard Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Marina Wälti; Jeffrey Sallen; Manolis Adamakis; Fabienne Ennigkeit; Erin Gerlach; Christopher Heim; Boris Jidovtseff; Irene Kossyva; Jana Labudová; Dana Masaryková; Remo Mombarg; Liliane De Sousa Morgado; Benjamin Niederkofler; Maike Niehues; Marcos Onofre; Uwe Pühse; Ana Quitério; Claude Scheuer; Harald Seelig; Petr Vlček; Jaroslav Vrbas; Christian Herrmann Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-04-25
Authors: Jiani Ma; Natalie Lander; Emma L J Eyre; Lisa M Barnett; Inimfon A Essiet; Michael J Duncan Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Eline Coppens; Farid Bardid; Frederik J A Deconinck; Leen Haerens; David Stodden; Eva D'Hondt; Matthieu Lenoir Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2019-10-02 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: An De Meester; Lisa M Barnett; Ali Brian; Steven J Bowe; Judith Jiménez-Díaz; Femke Van Duyse; J Megan Irwin; David F Stodden; Eva D'Hondt; Matthieu Lenoir; Leen Haerens Journal: Sports Med Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Peter Elsborg; Clara Heinze; Paulina S Melby; Glen Nielsen; Peter Bentsen; Knud Ryom Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Eline Coppens; Felien Laureys; Mireille Mostaert; Eva D'Hondt; Frederik J A Deconinck; Matthieu Lenoir Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 4.566