| Literature DB >> 30746334 |
Maasoume Abdollahi1, Mojdeh Salehnia1, Saghar Salehpour2, Shahram Pour-Beiranvand1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For improving the human ovarian tissue culture, this study was designed to assess the incidence of apoptosis in this tissue following vitrification and in vitro culture in the presence of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) as an anti-apoptotic factor.Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; Caspase-3/7; In vitro culture; Leukemia inhibitory factor; Ovarian tissue; Vitrification
Year: 2018 PMID: 30746334 PMCID: PMC6328982
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Reprod Infertil ISSN: 2228-5482
Oligonucleotide primers
| GAPDH | Forward:5′CTGGGCTACACTGAGCACC 3′ | 101 | |
| Fas | Forward: 5′TGAAGGACATGGCTTAGAAGTG 3′ | 118 | |
| FasL | Forward: 5′GCAGCCCTTCAATTACCCAT 3′ | 101 | |
| Bcl2 | Forward:5′TTGCTTTACGTGGCCTGTTTC3′ | 94 | |
| Bax | Forward: 5′CCCGAGAGGTCTTTTTCCGAG3′ | 155 | |
| p53 | Forward: 5′GAGGTTGGCTCTGACTGTACC3′ | 133 | |
| BIRC5 | Forward:5′AGGACCACCGCATCTCTACAT3′ | 118 | |
| caspase8 | Forward: 5′ATTTGCCTGTATGCCCGAGC 3′ | 105 | |
| caspase3 | Forward: 5′AGAGGGGATCGTTGTAGAAGTC 3′ | 81 |
Figure 1.Light microscopy of human ovarian cortex after 14 days of in vitro culture; samples stained by haematoxylin and eosin. The morphology of follicles in the non-vitrified–LIF+ group (A), vitrified–LIF+ (B) non-vitrified–LIF− (C) and vitrified–LIF− (D) groups is shown. Damaged follicle with disorganized granulosa cells was seen (Arrow head)
The number and percentage of normal follicles at different developmental stages in all experimental groups
| 27 (76±0.5) | 9 (24±0.2) | 21 (79±3.5) | 5 (17.4±0.4) | 1 (3.6±0.13) | |
| 42 (67.27±4.2) | 18 (32.73±0.14) | 42 (77.9±4.14) | 10 (18.6±0.5) | 3 (3.5±0.15) | |
| 52 (88.67±5.6) | 8 (13.3±0.15) | 35 (65.23±3.02) | 13 (24.31±0.3) | 6 (10.46±0.17) | |
| 43 (86.3±3.6) | 7 (14±0.11) | 28 (64.54±4) | 11 (25.3±3.5) | 5 (10.16±0.17) |
All experiments were done at least in 5 repeats and n=5 in each group.
Significant differences with the same non-vitrified groups (p<0.05)
Significant differences with the same non-LIF treated-cultured groups (p<0.05)
The Level of 17-β estradiol, progesterone and dehydroepiandrostrone in all cultured groups at days 2 and 14 of cultivation period
| 5725±278 | 8548±211 | 63±4 | 83±2 | 184±11 | 169±6 | |
| 6100±656 | 7899±856 | 60±5 | 75±3 | 176±8 | 158±7 | |
| 5829±643 | 28062±1003 [ | 72±8 | 251±12 [ | 186±15 | 94±3 [ | |
| 5200±223 | 27651±587 [ | 68±6 | 245±15 [ | 170±7 | 98±5 [ | |
All experiments were done at least in 3 repeats and n=3 in each group.
Significant differences with the same non-LIF treated-cultured groups (p<0.05).
Significant differences between day 14 and day 2 in the same group (p<0.05)
Figure 2.Ultrastructure of human ovarian follicles after 14 days of in vitro culture in the presence and absence of LIF. (A) Nonvitrified–LIF+ group; (B) Vitrified–LIF+; (C) Non-vitrified–LIF−; (D) Ditrified–LIF−; (E–H) High magnification images of previous groups, respectively. The chromatin in oocytes and follicular cells was normal in all groups. ON: Oocyte nucleus; NM: Oocyte nuclear membrane; OO: Ooplasm; GN: Granulosa cell nucleus; M: Mitochondria
Figure 3.TUNEL assay in the non-vitrified–LIF+ group (A), vitrified–LIF+ (B) non-vitrified–LIF− (C) and vitrified–LIF−(D) groups is shown. Total DNA gel electrophoresis in cultured human ovarian tissue (E). The DNA laddering pattern was present in the apoptosis-induced ovarian tissue (IOT) but not in the non-vitrified–LIF+ group (NVC LIF+), vitrified– LIF+ (VC LIF+), non-vitrified–LIF− (NVC LIF−) and vitrified–LIF− (VC LIF−) groups. Ladder: 100-bp molecular weight marker. The comparison of caspase 3/7 activity among all cultured human ovarian tissue is shown in part (B). Maximal activity was seen in apoptosis-induced mouse thymus (T). Non-vitrified–LIF− (NVCLIF−); vitrified–LIF− (VCLIF−); non-vitrified–LIF+ (NVCLIF+); vitrified–LIF+ (VCLIF+) groups. RLU: Relative luminescence units/μg of total protein. *: Significant differences between LIF-treated and non-LIF-treated groups (p<0.05)
Caspase 3/7 activity in studied groups (mean±SE)
| 16370±658.49 | |
| 13533.33±785.98 | |
| 12700±351.11 | |
| 2158±34.034 | |
| 2042±70.868 |
There was no significant difference between groups. All experiments were done at least in 3 repeats and n=3 in each group
The expression of pro-apoptotic genes expression to housekeeping gene (GAPDH) in studied groups (Mean±SE)
| 0.0089±0.0004 | 0.0173±0.002 | 0.0007±0.0019 | 0.0142±0.0017 | 0.0021±0.0019 | 0.0957±0.004 | |
| 0.0215±0.0012 | 0.0245±0.001 | 0.0054±0.0032 | 0.3103±0.0019 | 0.0052±0.0003 | 0.1062±0.006 | |
| 0.0040±0.0067 | 0.0086±0.0003 | 0.0037±0.0004 | 0.0062±0.0017 | 0.0008±0.00009 | 0.4620±0.002 | |
| 0.0062±0.0001 [ | 0.0062±0.0001 [ | 0.0044±0.0005 | 0.0082±0.0004 [ | 0.0006±0.0001[ | 0.0567±0.002[ |
Significant difference with non-vitrified group in respected group (p<0.05).
Significant difference with non-LIF-treated group in respected group (p<0.05).
All experiments were done at least in 3 repeats and n=3 in each group
The expression of anti-apoptotic genes expression to housekeeping gene (GAPDH) in studied groups (Mean±SE)
| 0.085±0.007 | 0.166±0.018 | 0.086±0.007 | |
| 0.073±0.005 | 0.149±0.018 | 0.074±0.011 | |
| 0.092±0.005 | 0.301±0.028 | 0.039±0.003 | |
| 0.877±0.004 | 0.284±0.015 | 0.049±0.012 |
Significant difference with non-LIF-treated group in respected group (p<0.05). All experiments were done at least in 3 repeats and n=3 in each group