Literature DB >> 30745048

The impact of the radial artery or the saphenous vein in addition to the bilateral internal mammary arteries on late survival: A propensity score analysis.

Francesco Formica1, Stefano D'Alessandro2, Gurmeet Singh3, Ana Maria Ciobanu4, Luigi Amerigo Messina5, Salvatore Scianna2, Mario Moscatiello2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival benefits of full arterial revascularization with radial artery (RA) used in addition to bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) compared with saphenous vein (SV) used in addition to BIMA has not been clearly defined.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 660 3-vessel coronary artery disease subjects who received BIMA in addition to either RA (n = 206) or SV (n = 454) grafting in a period between June 1999 and November 2017. After propensity score matching, we obtained 190 matched pairs for analysis.
RESULTS: In the matched population, in-hospital mortality occurred in 4 patients (1%), with 2 deaths (1.1%) in the BIMA + RA group and 2 deaths (1.1%) in BIMA + SV group (P > .99). The median follow-up time was 9.2 years (interquartile range, 5.6-13 years) with a maximum follow-up time of 18.5 years. There was not a significant difference in long-term survival between the 2 groups over the follow-up period. Survival at 5, 10, and 15 years were 94.8 ± 1.7%, 83.7 ± 3.1%, and 78.6 ± 3.9% in the BIMA + RA group and 96.2 ± 1.4%, 85.1 ± 2.9%, and 80.4 ± 3.6% in the BIMA + SV group (stratified log-rank P = .78). Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to estimate that the use of RA in addition to BIMA did not affect the late mortality (propensity score adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-1.79; P = .83).
CONCLUSIONS: In a relatively small population of triple-vessel coronary artery disease, the use of RA as a third arterial conduit with BIMA did not confer a long-term survival benefit.
Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CABG; bilateral internal mammary arteries; radial artery; total arterial myocardial revascularization

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30745048     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   6.439


  4 in total

Review 1.  Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein as Third Conduit in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: a Ten-Year Literature Review.

Authors:  Francesco Maestri; Francesco Formica; Alan Gallingani; Florida Gripshi; Francesco Nicolini
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 2.  Outcomes of total arterial revascularization vs conventional revascularization in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A narrative review of major studies.

Authors:  Carmelo Dominici; Massimo Chello; Sahrai Saeed
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.340

Review 3.  Total Arterial Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery is Associated with Better Long-Term Survival in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sérgio C Rayol; Jef Van den Eynde; Luiz Rafael P Cavalcanti; Antonio Carlos Escorel; Arian Arjomandi Rad; Andrea Amabile; Wilson Botelho; Arjang Ruhparwar; Konstantin Zhigalov; Alexander Weymann; Dario Celestino Sobral; Michel Pompeu B O Sá
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-02-01

4.  What is the best choice for third conduit when using bilateral internal mammary arteries for coronary artery bypass grafting-radial artery or saphenous vein graft?

Authors:  Ursula Kemp; Reece A Davies
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-05-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.