Literature DB >> 30745036

Outcome of surgical treatment of inter prosthetic fractures: A case series.

Toby Jennison1, Rathan Yarlagadda2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Interprosthetic fractures occur between a total knee replacement and a femoral stem of either a hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement. The number of interprosthetic fractures will increase as the number of joint replacements rises. There is currently a paucity of literature looking at the outcomes of interprosthetic fractures. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study to: (1) determine fracture union in patients following surgical treatment of a femoral interprosthetic fracture, (2) measure outcomes included mortality and complications. HYPOTHESIS: Favoring bone fixation instead of prosthetic revision gives an acceptable rate of reoperation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case note review of all interprosthetic femoral fractures admitted to a tertiary trauma centre over a 7-year period. There were 24 patients (4 males and 20 females) with a mean age of 82.3 (65-98). The initial operative procedure was a total hip replacement (THR) and a total knee replacement (TKR) in 19 patients, one THR and revision TKR, four hip hemiarthroplasty and TKR. There were 23 cemented femoral stems, and 1 uncemented femoral stem. The median time to surgery was 84hours. The median length of hospital stay was 16 days. Nineteen patients underwent open reduction internal fixation and 1 of these used a strut graft. Two patients underwent revision knee replacements and 3 underwent a revision hip replacement. All patients had at least 2 years clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: One patient died within 30 days of fracture, leaving 23 patients to assess bone union. Another patient died within 1 year of fracture. Three out of 24 patients (12.5%) suffered a complication that required further surgery. The fracture united in 19/23 (82.6%) of patients and the 2-year mortality rate was 5/24 (20.8%). DISCUSSION: Interprosthetic fractures are complex fractures occurring in elderly patients with multiple medical comorbidities. Whenever possible bone fixation instead of prostehtic revision give a low rate of complication and reoperation. The surgical treatments are complex, but with a well-performed surgical technique and an adequate rehabilitation program can result in satisfactory outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interprosthetic fracture; Revision arthroplasty; Union

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30745036     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  3 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the surgical outcomes of interprosthetic femur fractures.

Authors:  Brian M Rao; Phillip Stokey; Mina Tanios; Jiayong Liu; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-31

Review 2.  The Global Burden of Surgical Management of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Seth M Tarrant; Zsolt J Balogh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Interprosthetic femoral fractures: management challenges.

Authors:  Joshua C Rozell; Dimitri E Delagrammaticas; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2019-09-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.