Literature DB >> 30744991

Cooperative Changes in Solvent Exposure Identify Cryptic Pockets, Switches, and Allosteric Coupling.

Justin R Porter1, Katelyn E Moeder1, Carrie A Sibbald1, Maxwell I Zimmerman1, Kathryn M Hart2, Michael J Greenberg1, Gregory R Bowman3.   

Abstract

Proteins are dynamic molecules that undergo conformational changes to a broad spectrum of different excited states. Unfortunately, the small populations of these states make it difficult to determine their structures or functional implications. Computer simulations are an increasingly powerful means to identify and characterize functionally relevant excited states. However, this advance has uncovered a further challenge: it can be extremely difficult to identify the most salient features of large simulation data sets. We reasoned that many functionally relevant conformational changes are likely to involve large, cooperative changes to the surfaces that are available to interact with potential binding partners. To examine this hypothesis, we introduce a method that returns a prioritized list of potentially functional conformational changes by segmenting protein structures into clusters of residues that undergo cooperative changes in their solvent exposure, along with the hierarchy of interactions between these groups. We term these groups exposons to distinguish them from other types of clusters that arise in this analysis and others. We demonstrate, using three different model systems, that this method identifies experimentally validated and functionally relevant conformational changes, including conformational switches, allosteric coupling, and cryptic pockets. Our results suggest that key functional sites are hubs in the network of exposons. As a further test of the predictive power of this approach, we apply it to discover cryptic allosteric sites in two different β-lactamase enzymes that are widespread sources of antibiotic resistance. Experimental tests confirm our predictions for both systems. Importantly, we provide the first evidence, to our knowledge, for a cryptic allosteric site in CTX-M-9 β-lactamase. Experimentally testing this prediction did not require any mutations and revealed that this site exerts the most potent allosteric control over activity of any pockets found in β-lactamases to date. Discovery of a similar pocket that was previously overlooked in the well-studied TEM-1 β-lactamase demonstrates the utility of exposons.
Copyright © 2019 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30744991      PMCID: PMC6400826          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.11.3144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  16 in total

1.  Antagonism between substitutions in β-lactamase explains a path not taken in the evolution of bacterial drug resistance.

Authors:  Cameron A Brown; Liya Hu; Zhizeng Sun; Meha P Patel; Sukrit Singh; Justin R Porter; Banumathi Sankaran; B V Venkataram Prasad; Gregory R Bowman; Timothy Palzkill
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Investigating Cryptic Binding Sites by Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Antonija Kuzmanic; Gregory R Bowman; Jordi Juarez-Jimenez; Julien Michel; Francesco L Gervasio
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  Structure-Based Analysis of Cryptic-Site Opening.

Authors:  Zhuyezi Sun; Amanda Elizabeth Wakefield; Istvan Kolossvary; Dmitri Beglov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  New perspectives in cancer drug development: computational advances with an eye to design.

Authors:  Matteo Castelli; Stefano A Serapian; Filippo Marchetti; Alice Triveri; Valentina Pirota; Luca Torielli; Simona Collina; Filippo Doria; Mauro Freccero; Giorgio Colombo
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2021-07-07

5.  Spatial and temporal alterations in protein structure by EGF regulate cryptic cysteine oxidation.

Authors:  Jessica B Behring; Sjoerd van der Post; Arshag D Mooradian; Matthew J Egan; Maxwell I Zimmerman; Jenna L Clements; Gregory R Bowman; Jason M Held
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 8.192

6.  Will the Real Cryptic Pocket Please Stand Out?

Authors:  Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Identification of Cryptic Binding Sites Using MixMD with Standard and Accelerated Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 8.  An integrated view of p53 dynamics, function, and reactivation.

Authors:  Özlem Demir; Emilia P Barros; Tavina L Offutt; Mia Rosenfeld; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  Discovery of a hidden transient state in all bromodomain families.

Authors:  Lluís Raich; Katharina Meier; Judith Günther; Clara D Christ; Frank Noé; Simon Olsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  SARS-CoV-2 simulations go exascale to predict dramatic spike opening and cryptic pockets across the proteome.

Authors:  Maxwell I Zimmerman; Justin R Porter; Michael D Ward; Sukrit Singh; Neha Vithani; Artur Meller; Upasana L Mallimadugula; Catherine E Kuhn; Jonathan H Borowsky; Rafal P Wiewiora; Matthew F D Hurley; Aoife M Harbison; Carl A Fogarty; Joseph E Coffland; Elisa Fadda; Vincent A Voelz; John D Chodera; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 24.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.