Literature DB >> 30744975

Microtubule End-Clustering Maintains a Steady-State Spindle Shape.

Christina L Hueschen1, Vahe Galstyan2, Meelad Amouzgar3, Rob Phillips4, Sophie Dumont5.   

Abstract

Each time a cell divides, the microtubule cytoskeleton self-organizes into the metaphase spindle: an ellipsoidal steady-state structure that holds its stereotyped geometry despite microtubule turnover and internal stresses [1-6]. Regulation of microtubule dynamics, motor proteins, microtubule crosslinking, and chromatid cohesion can modulate spindle size and shape, and yet modulated spindles reach and hold a new steady state [7-11]. Here, we ask what maintains any spindle steady-state geometry. We report that clustering of microtubule ends by dynein and NuMA is essential for mammalian spindles to hold a steady-state shape. After dynein or NuMA deletion, the mitotic microtubule network is "turbulent"; microtubule bundles extend and bend against the cell cortex, constantly remodeling network shape. We find that spindle turbulence is driven by the homotetrameric kinesin-5 Eg5, and that acute Eg5 inhibition in turbulent spindles recovers spindle geometry and stability. Inspired by in vitro work on active turbulent gels of microtubules and kinesin [12, 13], we explore the kinematics of this in vivo turbulent network. We find that turbulent spindles display decreased nematic order and that motile asters distort the nematic director field. Finally, we see that turbulent spindles can drive both flow of cytoplasmic organelles and whole-cell movement-analogous to the autonomous motility displayed by droplet-encapsulated turbulent gels [12]. Thus, end-clustering by dynein and NuMA is required for mammalian spindles to reach a steady-state geometry, and in their absence Eg5 powers a turbulent microtubule network inside mitotic cells.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NuMA; active nematic; dynein; kinesin-5; microtubule minus-end; microtubules; mitosis; self-organization; spindle; spindle shape

Year:  2019        PMID: 30744975      PMCID: PMC6383811          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  9 in total

1.  Active forces shape the metaphase spindle through a mechanical instability.

Authors:  David Oriola; Frank Jülicher; Jan Brugués
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mechanisms of chromosome biorientation and bipolar spindle assembly analyzed by computational modeling.

Authors:  Christopher Edelmaier; Adam R Lamson; Zachary R Gergely; Saad Ansari; Robert Blackwell; J Richard McIntosh; Matthew A Glaser; Meredith D Betterton
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Opposing motors provide mechanical and functional robustness in the human spindle.

Authors:  Lila Neahring; Nathan H Cho; Sophie Dumont
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 12.270

4.  PP2A--B55γ counteracts Cdk1 and regulates proper spindle orientation through the cortical dynein adaptor NuMA.

Authors:  Riya Keshri; Ashwathi Rajeevan; Sachin Kotak
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Cross-linker design determines microtubule network organization by opposing motors.

Authors:  Gil Henkin; Wei-Xiang Chew; François Nédélec; Thomas Surrey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 6.  Understanding the underlying mechanisms governing spindle orientation: How far are we from there?

Authors:  Tao Zhong; Xiaoxiao Gongye; Minglei Wang; Jinming Yu
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 5.295

Review 7.  The Generation of Dynein Networks by Multi-Layered Regulation and Their Implication in Cell Division.

Authors:  Takayuki Torisawa; Akatsuki Kimura
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-01-31

8.  The mitotic protein NuMA plays a spindle-independent role in nuclear formation and mechanics.

Authors:  Andrea Serra-Marques; Ronja Houtekamer; Dorine Hintzen; John T Canty; Ahmet Yildiz; Sophie Dumont
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  NuMA interaction with chromatin is vital for proper chromosome decondensation at the mitotic exit.

Authors:  Ashwathi Rajeevan; Riya Keshri; Sukriti Kapoor; Sachin Kotak
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.138

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.