| Literature DB >> 30744355 |
Chinda Wann1, Metha Wanapat1, Chaowarit Mapato1, Thiwakorn Ampapon1, Bi-Zhi Huang2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of bamboo grass (Tiliacora triandra, Diels) pellet (Bamboo-Cass) supplementation on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, rumen microbial population and methane production in Thai native beef cattle.Entities:
Keywords: Bamboo-Cass; Methane Production; Rice Straw; Rumen Fermentation
Year: 2019 PMID: 30744355 PMCID: PMC6599947 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.18.0703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Feed ingredients of concentrate and chemical composition of the feeds
| Items | Concentrate | Rice straw | Bamboo grass | Bamboo-Cass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feed ingredients, % as fresh basis | ||||
| Cassava chip | 61.0 | - | - | - |
| Coconut meal | 12.0 | - | - | - |
| Rice bran | 1.0 | - | - | - |
| Palm meal | 20.0 | - | - | - |
| Urea | 2.5 | - | - | - |
| Molasses | 2.0 | - | - | - |
| Sulphur | 0.5 | - | - | - |
| Premix | 0.5 | - | - | - |
| Salt | 0.5 | - | - | - |
| Total | 100 | - | - | - |
| Chemical compositions | ||||
| DM (%) | 87.5 | 88.5 | 35.7 | 87.0 |
| ---------------------% of dry matter-------------------- | ||||
| OM | 94.2 | 87.9 | 92.5 | 94.7 |
| CP | 14.3 | 2.1 | 16.0 | 14.7 |
| NDF | 27.6 | 75.1 | 61.9 | 56.6 |
| ADF | 18.2 | 55.6 | 40.3 | 36.7 |
| Condensed tannins | - | - | 3.1 | 2.8 |
| Crude saponins | - | - | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| Minerals (%) | ||||
| Calcium | - | - | - | 1.5 |
| Phosphorus | - | - | - | 0.1 |
| Potassium | - | - | - | 2.6 |
| Sodium | - | - | - | 0.1 |
| Magnesium | - | - | - | 0.4 |
Bamboo-Cass, Bamboo grass pellet; DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber.
Contains per kilogram: 4,000,000 IU vitamin A; 400,000 IU vitamin D3; 4,000 IU vitamin E; 0.002 g vitamin B12; 16 g Mn; 24 g Fe; 10 g Zn; 2 g Cu; 0.05 g Se; 0.2 g Co, 0.5 g I.
Effect of Bamboo-Cass on feed intake and nutrient digestibility in beef cattle
| Items | Bamboo-Cass (g/head/d) | SEM | p-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| 0 | 50 | 100 | 150 | L | Q | C | ||
| Rice straw DM intake | ||||||||
| kg/d | 2.6 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 0.15 | 0.087 | 0.385 | 0.708 |
| %BW | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.03 | 0.025 | 0.198 | 1.000 |
| Concentrate intake | ||||||||
| kg/d | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.01 | 0.603 | 1.000 | 0.315 |
| Total intake | ||||||||
| kg/d | 3.6 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 0.06 | 0.005 | 0.367 | 0.597 |
| %BW | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 0.03 | 0.009 | 0.186 | 0.993 |
| Apparent digestibility (%) | ||||||||
| DM | 62.5 | 65.6 | 66.5 | 66.1 | 0.66 | 0.049 | 0.425 | 0.431 |
| OM | 71.0 | 70.0 | 73.0 | 72.0 | 0.49 | 0.109 | 0.269 | 0.047 |
| CP | 61.5 | 63.2 | 65.0 | 64.3 | 0.49 | 0.833 | 0.045 | 0.881 |
| NDF | 50.5 | 52.7 | 56.6 | 52.1 | 0.62 | 0.150 | 0.044 | 0.425 |
| ADF | 40.4 | 43.2 | 46.3 | 42.2 | 0.45 | 0.201 | 0.034 | 0.427 |
| Nutrient intake (kg/d) | ||||||||
| DM | 2.6 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.09 | 0.862 | 0.525 | 0.531 |
| OM | 2.4 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0.08 | 0.791 | 0.319 | 0.283 |
| CP | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.236 | 0.266 | 0.676 |
| NDF | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.08 | 0.697 | 0.328 | 0.411 |
| ADF | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.05 | 0.617 | 0.283 | 0.358 |
SEM, standard error of mean; L, linear; Q, quadratic; C, cubic; Bamboo-Cass, Bamboo grass pellet; DM, dry matter; BW, body weight; OM, organic matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber.
Values within the row with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05).
Effect of Bamboo-Cass on rumen fermentation in beef cattle
| Items | Bamboo-Cass (g/head/d) | SEM | p-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| 0 | 50 | 100 | 150 | L | Q | C | ||
| Rumen pH | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 6.7 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 0.02 | 0.245 | 0.544 | 0.091 |
| 4 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 0.02 | 0.591 | 0.291 | 0.093 |
| Mean | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 0.02 | 0.220 | 0.719 | 0.056 |
| Temperature (°C) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 39.2 | 39.2 | 39.2 | 39.3 | 0.11 | 0.645 | 0.730 | 0.877 |
| 4 | 39.5 | 39.3 | 39.3 | 39.2 | 0.07 | 0.345 | 0.242 | 0.291 |
| Mean | 39.3 | 39.3 | 39.2 | 39.2 | 0.06 | 0.750 | 0.228 | 0.058 |
| NH3-N (mg/dL) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 14.2 | 15.6 | 19.5 | 13.5 | 0.44 | 0.664 | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| 4 | 13.5 | 16.7 | 13.5 | 13.2 | 0.22 | 0.072 | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Mean | 13.9 | 16.2 | 16.5 | 13.4 | 0.20 | 0.519 | 0.001 | 0.442 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 13.0 | 13.0 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 0.14 | 0.172 | 1.000 | 0.468 |
| 4 | 13.8 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 0.21 | 0.708 | 0.779 | 0.900 |
| Mean | 13.4 | 13.5 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 0.17 | 0.396 | 0.859 | 0.812 |
| Total VFA (mmol/L) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 99.9 | 106.2 | 101.2 | 101.8 | 1.92 | 0.971 | 0.482 | 0.358 |
| 4 | 100.9 | 107.3 | 108.2 | 105.3 | 1.55 | 0.352 | 0.189 | 0.908 |
| Mean | 100.4 | 106.8 | 104.7 | 103.6 | 1.60 | 0.625 | 0.291 | 0.537 |
| Acetate (C2) (%) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 74.8 | 70.2 | 72.1 | 70.4 | 0.62 | 0.158 | 0.336 | 0.127 |
| 4 | 74.3 | 66.1 | 67.9 | 67.5 | 0.76 | 0.034 | 0.042 | 0.124 |
| Mean | 74.5 | 68.2 | 69.6 | 68.9 | 0.47 | 0.010 | 0.022 | 0.054 |
| Propionate (C3) (%) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 14.4 | 18.2 | 16.6 | 18.5 | 0.61 | 0.249 | 0.705 | 0.184 |
| 4 | 15.1 | 23.7 | 22.7 | 22.4 | 0.72 | 0.018 | 0.019 | 0.147 |
| Mean | 14.7 | 21.0 | 19.3 | 20.3 | 0.56 | 0.021 | 0.052 | 0.165 |
| Butyrate (C4) (%) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 10.8 | 11.6 | 11.4 | 11.1 | 0.41 | 0.594 | 0.357 | 0.659 |
| 4 | 10.6 | 10.1 | 9.4 | 10.1 | 0.13 | 0.128 | 0.069 | 0.205 |
| Mean | 10.7 | 10.8 | 10.4 | 10.6 | 0.24 | 0.739 | 0.920 | 0.582 |
| C2:C3 ratio | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 5.2 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 0.18 | 0.048 | 0.508 | 0.110 |
| 4 | 4.9 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.17 | 0.011 | 0.018 | 0.144 |
| Mean | 4.4 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 0.11 | 0.044 | 0.176 | 0.049 |
| Estimated methane production (mmol/100 mol) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 34.0 | 31.2 | 32.4 | 31.0 | 0.33 | 0.032 | 0.169 | 0.048 |
| 4 | 33.5 | 27.3 | 28.1 | 28.3 | 0.59 | 0.103 | 0.058 | 0.206 |
| Mean | 33.8 | 29.3 | 30.3 | 28.9 | 0.32 | 0.003 | 0.051 | 0.033 |
SEM, standard error of mean; L, linear; Q, quadratic; C, cubic; Bamboo-Cass, Bamboo grass pellet; NH3-N, ammonia nitrogen; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; VFA, volatile fatty acid; C2:C3, acetate:propionate.
Values within the row with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05).
Effect of Bamboo-Cass on microbial population in beef cattle
| Items | Bamboo-Cass (g/head/d) | SEM | p-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| 0 | 50 | 100 | 150 | L | Q | C | ||
| Total direct count (cells/mL) | ||||||||
| Protozoa (×105) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 0.11 | 0.283 | 0.779 | 0.708 |
| 4 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 0.31 | 0.161 | 0.278 | 0.613 |
| Mean | 3.3 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 0.18 | 0.049 | 0.369 | 0.617 |
| Bacteria (×1011) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 28.0 | 28.3 | 28.4 | 28.6 | 0.18 | 0.495 | 0.078 | 0.072 |
| 4 | 30.1 | 31.4 | 35.6 | 37.5 | 0.43 | 0.001 | 0.077 | 0.965 |
| Mean | 29.6 | 29.9 | 32.0 | 33.0 | 0.29 | 0.003 | 0.066 | 0.501 |
| Roll-tube technique (CFU/mL) | ||||||||
| Amylolytic (108) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 3.1 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 0.14 | 0.738 | 0.020 | 0.200 |
| 4 | 4.0 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 6.8 | 0.17 | 0.002 | 0.325 | 0.146 |
| Mean | 3.6 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 0.14 | 0.013 | 0.069 | 0.809 |
| Proteolytic (108) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 2.3 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 0.09 | 0.417 | 0.654 | 0.137 |
| 4 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 0.06 | 0.077 | 0.004 | 0.148 |
| Mean | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 0.10 | 0.675 | 0.363 | 0.638 |
| Cellulolytic (109) | ||||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 5.5 | 0.10 | 0.057 | 0.204 | 0.692 |
| 4 | 4.8 | 7.2 | 8.0 | 9.8 | 0.14 | 0.001 | 0.322 | 0.089 |
| Mean | 4.8 | 6.0 | 6.4 | 7.6 | 0.12 | 0.001 | 0.831 | 0.243 |
SEM, standard error of mean; L, linear; Q, quadratic; C, cubic; Bamboo-Cass, Bamboo grass pellet; CFU, colony-forming unit.
Values within the row with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05).