| Literature DB >> 30744089 |
Gerrit M Grosse1, Saskia Biber2,3, Jan-Thorben Sieweke4, Jens Martens-Lobenhoffer5, Maria M Gabriel6, Anne-Sophie Putzer7, Isabel Hasse8, Till van Gemmeren9, Ramona Schuppner10, Hans Worthmann11, Ralf Lichtinghagen12, Stefanie M Bode-Böger13, Udo Bavendiek14, Karin Weissenborn15.
Abstract
A relevant part of embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) is assumed to be due to non-detected atrial fibrillation (AF). In this study, we aimed to investigate if markers of endothelial dysfunction and damage may indicate AF risk in embolic stroke. Eighty-eight patients with ischemic stroke confirmed by imaging were assigned to one of three groups: ESUS, AF, or micro-/macroangiopathy. ESUS patients underwent prolonged Holter electrocardiography scheduled for three days. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the CHA₂DS₂VASC score, and the carotid intima⁻media thickness (CIMT) were obtained. Markers of endothelial (dys)function (L-arginine, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA)) were measured at day seven after stroke. ESUS patients were younger and had fewer cardiovascular risk factors than patients with determined stroke etiology. Compared with AF patients, ESUS patients showed significantly lower values of SDMA (p = 0.004) and higher values of L-arginine (p = 0.031), L-arginine/ADMA ratio (p = 0.006), L-arginine/SDMA ratio (p = 0.002), and ADMA/SDMA ratio (p = 0.013). Concordant differences could be observed comparing ESUS patients with those with newly diagnosed AF (p = 0.026; p = 0.03; p = 0.009; p = 0.004; and p = 0.046, respectively). CIMT was significantly larger in AF than in ESUS patients (p < 0.001), and was identified as an AF risk factor independent from CHA₂DS₂VASC in the regression analysis (p = 0.014). These findings may support future stratification for AF risk in patients who have suffered embolic stroke.Entities:
Keywords: ESUS; arginine; atrial fibrillation; dimethylarginine; embolic stroke; endothelial dysfunction; intima–media thickness
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30744089 PMCID: PMC6387438 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20030730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Baseline characteristics.
| ESUS | AF ( | Angiopathic Stroke | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previously Diagnosed | Newly Diagnosed | ||||
|
| 43 | 9 | 16 | 20 | |
| Age (a) (IQR) | 65.00 $$ | 83.00 **ßß
| 77.50 | 68.50 §§ |
|
| Male | 28 $ (65%) | 3 $ (33%) | 15 *§ (94%) | 13 (65%) |
|
| Female | 15 $ (35%) | 6 $ (66%) | 1 *§ (6%) | 7 (35%) | |
| ESRS (IQR) | 2.00 (1–3) | 3.00 (2.5–3.5) | 3.50 (2.25–4) | 3.00 (2–4) |
|
| CHA2DS2 VASC (IQR) | 4.00 $ (3–5) | 6.00 * (5–7) | 6.00 (5–7) | 5.00 (4–6.75) |
|
| Previous ischemic stroke | 8 (19%) | 1 (11%) | 3 (19%) | 8 (40%) | 0.199 |
| BMI (kg/m2) (IQR) | 26.06 | 24.45 $ß | 26.23 § | 27.49 § | 0.108 |
| NIHSS on admission (IQR) | 2 (1–5) | 4.00 (2–15.5) | 4.00 (1.25–6.75) | 3.00 (2–5) |
|
| Symptom to venous puncture time (days) (IQR) | 7.00 (6–7) | 7.00 (7–7) | 7.00 (6–7) | 7.00 (7–8) | 0.127 |
| Serum creatinine | 78.00 | 75.00 | 89 | 81.50 | 0.215 |
The factors age, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction, other cardiovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, nicotine consumption, previous stroke, and transient ischemic attack are subsumed in the ESRS. The factors age, sex, congestive heart failure, hypertension, history of Stroke/TIA/thromboembolism, other vascular disease, and diabetes mellitus are subsumed in the CHA2DS2VASC. */** indicates significant differences with the ESUS group. §/§§ indicates significant differences with the previously diagnosed AF group. $/$$ indicates significant differences with the newly diagnosed AF group. ß/ßß indicates significant differences with the angiopathic stroke group. p-values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney U-test, Kruskal–Wallis test or Chi-square test, as appropriate. p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant (bold).
Comparison of Dimethylarginines and Carotid Intima–Media Thickness (CIMT) between ESUS and AF.
| ESUS | Newly Diagnosed AF | AF (Total) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L-arginine (µmol/L) | 85.80 | 73.25 |
| 74.40 |
|
| ADMA (µmol/L) | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.50 | ||
| SDMA (µmol/L) | 0.49 | 0.56 |
| 0.58 |
|
| L-arginine/ADMA ratio | 176.51 | 148.75 |
| 148.64 |
|
| L-arginine/SDMA ratio | 177.84 | 126.17 |
| 118.03 |
|
| ADMA/SDMA ratio | 0.96 | 0.85 |
| 0.83 |
|
| CIMT (mm) | 0.66 | 0.83 |
| 0.85 |
|
p-values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney U-test comparing ESUS and newly diagnosed AF or ESUS and AF (total). p ≤ 0.05 was regarded as significant (bold).
Figure 1Group differences of L-arginine/SDMA ratio. AF (total) subsumes previously and newly diagnosed AF. * p ≤ 0.05 ** p ≤ 0.01; n.s.: not significant.
Figure 2ROC analysis of L-arginine/SDMA ratio (A) and CIMT (B) as distinguishing markers between AF and ESUS patients. a: AUC: 0.732; (95% CI: 0.610–0.854; p = 0.002); b: AUC: 0.807 (95% CI: 0.704–0.910; p < 0.001).
Figure 3Group differences in CIMT. AF (total) subsumes previously and newly diagnosed AF. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 4Correlation of L-arginine/SDMA ratio with CHA2DS2VASC (A) and ESRS (B) in the whole sample and within the ESUS collective (C,D). A: Spearman’s r: −0.50, p < 0.001; B: Spearman’s r: −0.46, p < 0.001; C: Spearman’s r: −0.47, p = 0.002; D: Spearman’s r: −0.53, p < 0.001.