PURPOSE: In an upcoming clinical trial at the Moffitt Cancer Center for women with stage 2/3 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, treatment with an aromatase inhibitor and a PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor combination will be investigated to lower a preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) that correlates with relapse-free survival. PEPI is fundamentally a static index, measured at the end of neoadjuvant therapy before surgery. We have developed a mathematical model of the essential components of the PEPI score to identify successful combination therapy regimens that minimize tumor burden and metastatic potential, on the basis of time-dependent trade-offs in the system. METHODS: We considered two molecular traits, CCR7 and PD-L1, which correlate with treatment response and increased metastatic risk. We used a matrix game model with the four phenotypic strategies to examine the frequency-dependent interactions of cancer cells. This game was embedded in an ecological model of tumor population-growth dynamics. The resulting model predicts evolutionary and ecological dynamics that track with changes in the PEPI score. RESULTS: We considered various treatment regimens on the basis of combinations of the two therapies with drug holidays. By considering the trade off between tumor burden and metastatic potential, the optimal therapy plan was a 1-month kick start of the immune checkpoint inhibitor followed by 5 months of continuous combination therapy. Relative to a protocol giving both therapeutics together from the start, this delayed regimen resulted in transient suboptimal tumor regression while maintaining a phenotypic constitution that is more amenable to fast tumor regression for the final 5 months of therapy. CONCLUSION: The mathematical model provides a useful abstraction of clinical intuition, enabling hypothesis generation and testing of clinical assumptions.
PURPOSE: In an upcoming clinical trial at the Moffitt Cancer Center for women with stage 2/3 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, treatment with an aromatase inhibitor and a PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor combination will be investigated to lower a preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) that correlates with relapse-free survival. PEPI is fundamentally a static index, measured at the end of neoadjuvant therapy before surgery. We have developed a mathematical model of the essential components of the PEPI score to identify successful combination therapy regimens that minimize tumor burden and metastatic potential, on the basis of time-dependent trade-offs in the system. METHODS: We considered two molecular traits, CCR7 and PD-L1, which correlate with treatment response and increased metastatic risk. We used a matrix game model with the four phenotypic strategies to examine the frequency-dependent interactions of cancer cells. This game was embedded in an ecological model of tumor population-growth dynamics. The resulting model predicts evolutionary and ecological dynamics that track with changes in the PEPI score. RESULTS: We considered various treatment regimens on the basis of combinations of the two therapies with drug holidays. By considering the trade off between tumor burden and metastatic potential, the optimal therapy plan was a 1-month kick start of the immune checkpoint inhibitor followed by 5 months of continuous combination therapy. Relative to a protocol giving both therapeutics together from the start, this delayed regimen resulted in transient suboptimal tumor regression while maintaining a phenotypic constitution that is more amenable to fast tumor regression for the final 5 months of therapy. CONCLUSION: The mathematical model provides a useful abstraction of clinical intuition, enabling hypothesis generation and testing of clinical assumptions.
Authors: F Stephen Hodi; Steven J O'Day; David F McDermott; Robert W Weber; Jeffrey A Sosman; John B Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia M Vaubel; Gerald P Linette; David Hogg; Christian H Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbé; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I Clark; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason Tian; Michael J Yellin; Geoffrey M Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J Urba Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Heather D Cunningham; Laura A Shannon; Psachal A Calloway; Brian C Fassold; Irene Dunwiddie; George Vielhauer; Ming Zhang; Charlotte M Vines Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Julie R Brahmer; Scott S Tykodi; Laura Q M Chow; Wen-Jen Hwu; Suzanne L Topalian; Patrick Hwu; Charles G Drake; Luis H Camacho; John Kauh; Kunle Odunsi; Henry C Pitot; Omid Hamid; Shailender Bhatia; Renato Martins; Keith Eaton; Shuming Chen; Theresa M Salay; Suresh Alaparthy; Joseph F Grosso; Alan J Korman; Susan M Parker; Shruti Agrawal; Stacie M Goldberg; Drew M Pardoll; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Philip M Arlen; James L Gulley; Catherine Parker; Lisa Skarupa; Mary Pazdur; Dennis Panicali; Patricia Beetham; Kwong Y Tsang; Douglas W Grosenbach; Jarett Feldman; Seth M Steinberg; Elizabeth Jones; Clara Chen; Jennifer Marte; Jeffrey Schlom; William Dahut Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Scott J Antonia; Noweeda Mirza; Ingo Fricke; Alberto Chiappori; Patricia Thompson; Nicholas Williams; Gerold Bepler; George Simon; William Janssen; Ji-Hyun Lee; Kerstin Menander; Sunil Chada; Dmitry I Gabrilovich Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Benjamin Wölfl; Hedy Te Rietmole; Monica Salvioli; Artem Kaznatcheev; Frank Thuijsman; Joel S Brown; Boudewijn Burgering; Kateřina Staňková Journal: Dyn Games Appl Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 1.296
Authors: Robin Schmucker; Gabriele Farina; James Faeder; Fabian Fröhlich; Ali Sinan Saglam; Tuomas Sandholm Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Narmin Ghaffari Laleh; Chiara Maria Lavinia Loeffler; Julia Grajek; Kateřina Staňková; Alexander T Pearson; Hannah Sophie Muti; Christian Trautwein; Heiko Enderling; Jan Poleszczuk; Jakob Nikolas Kather Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 4.475