Literature DB >> 30742198

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model of Swallowing Recovery and Enteral Tube Feeding After Ischemic Stroke.

Marian Galovic1,2,3, Anne Julia Stauber1, Natascha Leisi4, Werner Krammer1, Florian Brugger1, Jochen Vehoff1, Philipp Balcerak1, Anna Müller1, Marlise Müller4, Jochen Rosenfeld4, Alexandros Polymeris5, Sebastian Thilemann5, Gian Marco De Marchis5, Thorsten Niemann5, Maren Leifke5, Philippe Lyrer5, Petra Saladin6, Timo Kahles6, Krassen Nedeltchev6,7, Hakan Sarikaya7, Simon Jung7, Urs Fischer7, Concetta Manno8, Carlo W Cereda8, Josemir W Sander2,3,9, Barbara Tettenborn1, Bruno J Weder1,10, Sandro J Stoeckli4, Marcel Arnold7, Georg Kägi1.   

Abstract

Importance: Predicting the duration of poststroke dysphagia is important to guide therapeutic decisions. Guidelines recommend nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding if swallowing impairment persists for 7 days or longer and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement if dysphagia does not recover within 30 days, but, to our knowledge, a systematic prediction method does not exist. Objective: To develop and validate a prognostic model predicting swallowing recovery and the need for enteral tube feeding. Design, Setting, and Participants: We enrolled participants with consecutive admissions for acute ischemic stroke and initially severe dysphagia in a prospective single-center derivation (2011-2014) and a multicenter validation (July 2015-March 2018) cohort study in 5 tertiary stroke referral centers in Switzerland. Exposures: Severely impaired oral intake at admission (Functional Oral Intake Scale score <5). Main Outcomes and Measures: Recovery of oral intake (primary end point, Functional Oral Intake Scale ≥5) or return to prestroke diet (secondary end point) measured 7 (indication for NGT feeding) and 30 (indication for PEG feeding) days after stroke.
Results: In total, 279 participants (131 women [47.0%]; median age, 77 years [interquartile range, 67-84 years]) were enrolled (153 [54.8%] in the derivation study; 126 [45.2%] in the validation cohort). Overall, 64% (95% CI, 59-71) participants failed to recover functional oral intake within 7 days and 30% (95% CI, 24-37) within 30 days. Prolonged swallowing recovery was independently associated with poor outcomes after stroke. The final prognostic model, the Predictive Swallowing Score, included 5 variables: age, stroke severity on admission, lesion location, initial risk of aspiration, and initial impairment of oral intake. Predictive Swallowing Score prediction estimates ranged from 5% (score, 0) to 96% (score, 10) for a persistent impairment of oral intake on day 7 and from 2% to 62% on day 30. Model performance in the validation cohort showed a discrimination (C statistic) of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76-0.91; P < .001) for predicting the recovery of oral intake on day 7 and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.87; P < .001) on day 30, and a discrimination for a return to prestroke diet of 0.94 (day 7; 95% CI, 0.87-1.00; P < .001) and 0.71 (day 30; 95% CI, 0.61-0.82; P < .001). Calibration plots showed high agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: The Predictive Swallowing Score, available as a smartphone application, is an easily applied prognostic instrument that reliably predicts swallowing recovery. It will support decision making for NGT or PEG insertion after ischemic stroke and is a step toward personalized medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30742198      PMCID: PMC6515605          DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Neurol        ISSN: 2168-6149            Impact factor:   18.302


  33 in total

1.  Diverging lesion and connectivity patterns influence early and late swallowing recovery after hemispheric stroke.

Authors:  Marian Galovic; Natascha Leisi; Manuela Pastore-Wapp; Martin Zbinden; Sjoerd B Vos; Marlise Mueller; Johannes Weber; Florian Brugger; Georg Kägi; Bruno J Weder
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  American Gastroenterological Association technical review on tube feeding for enteral nutrition.

Authors:  D F Kirby; M H Delegge; C R Fleming
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Current practices in feeding tube placement for US acute ischemic stroke inpatients.

Authors:  Benjamin P George; Adam G Kelly; Eric B Schneider; Robert G Holloway
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS Study Group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score.

Authors:  P A Barber; A M Demchuk; J Zhang; A M Buchan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Lesion location predicts transient and extended risk of aspiration after supratentorial ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Marian Galovic; Natascha Leisi; Marlise Müller; Johannes Weber; Eugenio Abela; Georg Kägi; Bruno Weder
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Predictors of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with severe dysphagia from an acute-subacute hemispheric infarction.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar; Susan Langmore; Richard P Goddeau; Adel Alhazzani; Magdy Selim; Louis R Caplan; Lin Zhu; Adnan Safdar; Cynthia Wagner; Colleen Frayne; David E Searls; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  Inadequate fluid intakes in dysphagic acute stroke.

Authors:  K Whelan
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.324

8.  FOOD: a multicentre randomised trial evaluating feeding policies in patients admitted to hospital with a recent stroke.

Authors:  M Dennis; S Lewis; G Cranswick; J Forbes
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  The natural history and functional consequences of dysphagia after hemispheric stroke.

Authors:  D H Barer
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 10.  Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications.

Authors:  Rosemary Martino; Norine Foley; Sanjit Bhogal; Nicholas Diamant; Mark Speechley; Robert Teasell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  11 in total

1.  Predicting Failure to Recover Swallowing in Patients with Severe Post-stroke Dysphagia: The DIsPHAGIc Score.

Authors:  Antonio Muscari; Roberta Falcone; Enrico Pirazzoli; Luca Faccioli; Silvia Muscari; Marco Pastore Trossello; Giovanni M Puddu; Loredana Rignanese; Luca Spinardi; Marco Zoli
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Fostering eating after stroke (FEASt) trial for improving post-stroke dysphagia with non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar; Sarah Marchina; Susan Langmore; Joseph Massaro; Joseph Palmisano; Na Wang; David Eric Searls; Vasileios Lioutas; Jessica Pisegna; Cynthia Wagner; Anant Shinde; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sarah Marchina; Jessica M Pisegna; Joseph M Massaro; Susan E Langmore; Courtney McVey; Jeffrey Wang; Sandeep Kumar
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Post-stroke Dysphagia: Recent Insights and Unanswered Questions.

Authors:  Corinne A Jones; Christina M Colletti; Ming-Chieh Ding
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Ischemic Lesion Location Based on the ASPECT Score for Risk Assessment of Neurogenic Dysphagia.

Authors:  Sriramya Lapa; Christian Foerch; Oliver C Singer; Elke Hattingen; Sebastian Luger
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Association between timing of speech and language therapy initiation and outcomes among post-extubation dysphagia patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Takashi Hongo; Ryohei Yamamoto; Keibun Liu; Takahiko Yaguchi; Hisashi Dote; Ryusuke Saito; Tomoyuki Masuyama; Kosuke Nakatsuka; Shinichi Watanabe; Takahiro Kanaya; Tomoya Yamaguchi; Tetsuya Yumoto; Hiromichi Naito; Atsunori Nakao
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Speech-language pathology approaches to neurorehabilitation in acute care during COVID-19: Capitalizing on neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Nicole Langton-Frost; Martin B Brodsky
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.218

8.  Post-stroke Dysphagia: Prognosis and Treatment-A Systematic Review of RCT on Interventional Treatments for Dysphagia Following Subacute Stroke.

Authors:  Philipp Balcerak; Sydney Corbiere; Richard Zubal; Georg Kägi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Safety and performance of oropharyngeal muscle strength training in the treatment of post-stroke dysphagia during oral feeding: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Minxing Gao; Ying Wang; Lingyuan Xu; Xin Wang; Heying Wang; Jinan Song; Xiaoqiu Yang; Fenghua Zhou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality, complications, or outcomes.

Authors:  Kavya M Reddy; Preston Lee; Parul J Gor; Antonio Cheesman; Noor Al-Hammadi; David John Westrich; Jason Taylor
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.