Literature DB >> 30742071

Analytical and clinical validation of a microbial cell-free DNA sequencing test for infectious disease.

Timothy A Blauwkamp1, Simone Thair2, Judith C Wilber3, Samuel Yang2, Michael J Rosen3, Lily Blair3, Martin S Lindner3, Igor D Vilfan3, Trupti Kawli3, Fred C Christians3, Shivkumar Venkatasubrahmanyam3, Gregory D Wall3, Anita Cheung3, Zoë N Rogers3, Galit Meshulam-Simon3, Liza Huijse3, Sanjeev Balakrishnan3, James V Quinn2, Desiree Hollemon3, David K Hong3, Marla Lay Vaughn3, Mickey Kertesz3, Sivan Bercovici3.   

Abstract

Thousands of pathogens are known to infect humans, but only a fraction are readily identifiable using current diagnostic methods. Microbial cell-free DNA sequencing offers the potential to non-invasively identify a wide range of infections throughout the body, but the challenges of clinical-grade metagenomic testing must be addressed. Here we describe the analytical and clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing test that identifies and quantifies microbial cell-free DNA in plasma from 1,250 clinically relevant bacteria, DNA viruses, fungi and eukaryotic parasites. Test accuracy, precision, bias and robustness to a number of metagenomics-specific challenges were determined using a panel of 13 microorganisms that model key determinants of performance in 358 contrived plasma samples, as well as 2,625 infections simulated in silico and 580 clinical study samples. The test showed 93.7% agreement with blood culture in a cohort of 350 patients with a sepsis alert and identified an independently adjudicated cause of the sepsis alert more often than all of the microbiological testing combined (169 aetiological determinations versus 132). Among the 166 samples adjudicated to have no sepsis aetiology identified by any of the tested methods, sequencing identified microbial cell-free DNA in 62, likely derived from commensal organisms and incidental findings unrelated to the sepsis alert. Analysis of the first 2,000 patient samples tested in the CLIA laboratory showed that more than 85% of results were delivered the day after sample receipt, with 53.7% of reports identifying one or more microorganisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30742071     DOI: 10.1038/s41564-018-0349-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Microbiol        ISSN: 2058-5276            Impact factor:   17.745


  1 in total

1.  Plasma DNA as a prognostic marker in trauma patients.

Authors:  Y M Lo; T H Rainer; L Y Chan; N M Hjelm; R A Cocks
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 8.327

  1 in total
  164 in total

1.  Plasma cell-free DNA predicts pediatric cerebral malaria severity.

Authors:  Iset Medina Vera; Anne Kessler; Li-Min Ting; Visopo Harawa; Thomas Keller; Dylan Allen; Madi Njie; McKenze Moss; Monica Soko; Ajisa Ahmadu; Innocent Kadwala; Stephen Ray; Tonney S Nyirenda; Wilson L Mandala; Terrie E Taylor; Stephen J Rogerson; Karl B Seydel; Kami Kim
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-06-18

Review 2.  Molecular Diagnostic Advances in Transplant Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Brittany A Young; Kimberly E Hanson; Carlos A Gomez
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Genome-Centric Metagenomic Insights into the Impact of Alkaline/Acid and Thermal Sludge Pretreatment on the Microbiome in Digestion Sludge.

Authors:  Zhiwei Liang; Jiangjian Shi; Chen Wang; Junhui Li; Dawei Liang; Ee Ling Yong; Zhili He; Shanquan Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Sensitive Identification of Bacterial DNA in Clinical Specimens by Broad-Range 16S rRNA Gene Enrichment.

Authors:  Sara Rassoulian Barrett; Noah G Hoffman; Christopher Rosenthal; Andrew Bryan; Desiree A Marshall; Joshua Lieberman; Alexander L Greninger; Vikas Peddu; Brad T Cookson; Stephen J Salipante
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Effect of Geographic Isolation on the Nasal Virome of Indigenous Children.

Authors:  Eda Altan; Juan Carlos Dib; Andres Rojas Gulloso; Duamaco Escribano Juandigua; Xutao Deng; Roberta Bruhn; Kristen Hildebrand; Pamela Freiden; Janie Yamamoto; Stacey Schultz-Cherry; Eric Delwart
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Point-Counterpoint: Should We Be Performing Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Infectious Disease Diagnosis in the Clinical Laboratory?

Authors:  Steve Miller; Charles Chiu; Kyle G Rodino; Melissa B Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of Three Commercial Tools for Metagenomic Shotgun Sequencing Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Thoendel; Patricio Jeraldo; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Janet Yao; Nicholas Chia; Arlen D Hanssen; Matthew P Abdel; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Diagnosing and Managing Sepsis by Probing the Host Response to Infection: Advances, Opportunities, and Challenges.

Authors:  Ian L Gunsolus; Timothy E Sweeney; Oliver Liesenfeld; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification.

Authors:  Simon H Ye; Katherine J Siddle; Daniel J Park; Pardis C Sabeti
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  Sepsis 2019: What Surgeons Need to Know.

Authors:  Vanessa P Ho; Haytham Kaafarani; Rishi Rattan; Nicholas Namias; Heather Evans; Tanya L Zakrison
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.