| Literature DB >> 30742003 |
Xu-Dong Fan1,2, Bin Liang3, Jing Yang1, Jian-Chun Cheng1.
Abstract
The past decade witnesses considerable efforts to design acoustic illusion cloak that produces the desired scattered field for a specific object illuminated by an external field. Yet the possibility of generating acoustic illusion directly for a sound source still remains unexplored despite the great fundamental and practical significance, and previous transformation acoustics-based designs need to have bulky sizes in terms of working wavelength. Here we propose to produce arbitrary illusion for an airborne sound source with no need to resort to coordinate transformation method. Based on an inherently different mechanism that uses acoustic metasurface to provide azimuthally-dependent local phase delay to the radiated wavefront, we shrink the thickness of the single layer enclosing the source to subwavelength scale without modulating the shape of layer. The performance of our scheme is demonstrated via distinct phenomena of virtually shifting the source location and introducing angular momentum. Numerical results verify our theoretical predictions, showing the extraordinary capability of the presented device to freely manipulate the radiation pattern of a simplest point source, making it acoustically appearing like another arbitrarily complicated source. Our findings open new avenues to the design and application of acoustic illusion devices and may have deep implications in many diverse fields such as architectural acoustics and biomedical engineering.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30742003 PMCID: PMC6370878 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-38424-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic of the design for producing an illusion for airborne sound source. (a) Sound field outside the closed subwavelength layer (the black circle) surrounding a simple point source is identical to (b) the one generated by an arbitrary complicated source.
Figure 2(a) Schematic of the source shifter. (b) Desired phase profile versus azimuthal angles. (c) Simulated result with theoretical parameters.
Figure 3(a) Schematic of the source converter. (b) Desired phase profile versus azimuthal angles. (c) Simulated result with theoretical parameters.
Figure 4(a,b) Schematics of (a) the structure for source shifter and (b) of an individual unit cell. (c) Simulated transmission coefficient and phase shift of transmitted wave through individual units with different values of d/D. The eight dots mark the discrete phases provided by the eight particular unit cells to be used in the numerical simulations.
Figure 5(a,c) Discrete parameter profile of d/D provided by the practical devices for (a) a source shifter and (c) a source converter versus azimuthal angles. (b,d) Simulated pressure field for (b) source shifter and (d) source converter implemented by practical meta-structure.