Literature DB >> 30741877

Effects of Equal Volume But Different Plyometric Jump Training Intensities on Components of Physical Fitness in Physically Active Young Males.

Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo1, Jason Moran2, Benjamin Drury2, Mark Williams2, Justin W Keogh3,4,5, Helmi Chaabene6, Urs Granacher6.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Ramirez-Campillo, R, Moran, J, Drury, B, Williams, M, Keogh, JW, Chaabene, H, and Granacher, U. Effects of equal volume but different plyometric jump training intensities on components of physical fitness in physically active young males. J Strength Cond Res 35(7): 1916-1923, 2021-An 8-week single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effects of separate programs of equal volume, but different intensity, plyometric jump training (PJT), on physical fitness in healthy adults. Thirty-eight physically active males (mean age: 21.8 ± 2.5 years) participated. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of 3 PJT groups or a control (CON, n = 9) according to their jump performance. Plyometric jump training was conducted at maximal (PJT-100, n = 10), high (PJT-80, n = 9), or moderate (PJT-65, n = 10) intensity within each group. Baseline and follow-up tests were performed for the assessment of countermovement jump (CMJ) height, CMJ height with arm swing (CMJA), and drop jump height from a 20-cm drop box (DJ20), linear speed (30 m), and change-of-direction speed (CODS) (the Illinois CODS test). Results revealed significant group × time interactions for CMJ, CMJA, DJ20, 30-m sprint, and CODS (all p < 0.001; d = 0.39-0.76). Post hoc analyses showed significant improvements in all 5 fitness measures for PJT-100 (all p < 0.01, Δ3.7-13.5%, d = 0.26-1.4). For PJT-80, 3 of 5 fitness tests demonstrated significant change (CMJ: p < 0.001, Δ5.9%, d = 0.33; CMJA: p < 0.001, Δ7.0%, d = 0.43; CODS: p < 0.001, Δ3.9%, d = 0.9), and for PJT-65, only 1 test was significant (CMJ: p < 0.05, Δ2.8%, d = 0.15). No significant changes were observed in CON. Except for similar gains in DJ20 and 30-m sprint in PJT-100 and PJT-80, gains in physical fitness were, in general, greater (p < 0.05) after PJT-100 vs. PJT-80 vs. PJT-65 vs. CON. Therefore, maximal PJT intensity may induce larger physical fitness gains, although high and moderate intensities may also be useful, but to a lesser extent.
Copyright © 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 30741877     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Effects of Plyometric Jump Training on Vertical Jump Height of Volleyball Players: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; David C Andrade; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Jason Moran; Filipe Manuel Clemente; Helmi Chaabene; Paul Comfort
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump.

Authors:  Raynier Montoro-Bombú; Lázaro de la Paz Arencibia; Carlo Buzzichelli; Paulo Miranda-Oliveira; Orlando Fernandes; Amândio Santos; Luis Rama
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Programming Plyometric-Jump Training in Soccer: A Review.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Jason Moran; Jon L Oliver; Jason S Pedley; Rhodri S Lloyd; Urs Granacher
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

4.  Effects of Plyometric Jump Training on Measures of Physical Fitness and Sport-Specific Performance of Water Sports Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Alejandro Perez-Castilla; Rohit K Thapa; José Afonso; Filipe Manuel Clemente; Juan C Colado; Eduardo Saéz de Villarreal; Helmi Chaabene
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-08-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.