Literature DB >> 30741665

Biomechanical effect with respect to the sagittal positioning of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Kwan Kyu Park1, Yong-Gon Koh2, Kyoung-Mi Park3, Joon-Hee Park4, Kyoung-Tak Kang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Component malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been related to the concentration in tibiofemoral joint of contact stress and to poor post-operative outcomes. Few studies investigated a biomechanical effect of femur component position in sagittal plane. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of the femoral components on the sagittal alignment under flexion and extension conditions using computational simulations.
METHODS: The flexion and extension conditions of the femoral component were analyzed from 10° extension to 10° flexion in 1° increments. We considered the contact stresses in the polyethylene (PE) inserts and articular cartilage, and the force on the collateral ligament, under gait cycle conditions.
RESULTS: The contact stress on the PE insert increased as flexion of the femoral component increased, but there was not a remarkable difference in the amount of increased contact stress upon extension. There was no difference in the contact stress on the articular cartilage upon extension of the femoral component, but it increased in flexion during stance and double support periods. The forces on the medial collateral ligaments increased with the extension and decreased with the flexion of the femoral component, whereas the forces on the lateral collateral ligaments showed opposite trends.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should be concerned with femoral component position on UKA not only in frontal plane but also in the sagittal plane, because flexion or extension of the femoral component may impact the PE or opposite compartment along with the surrounding ligaments around knee joint.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; finite element analysis; malalignment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30741665     DOI: 10.3233/BME-191042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng        ISSN: 0959-2989            Impact factor:   1.300


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Research progress on finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in medial knee compartmental osteoarthritis].

Authors:  Huazhang Xiong; Yi Zeng; Haibo Si; Yuangang Wu; Bin Shen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-06-15

2.  Posterior condylar offset and posterior tibial slope targets to optimize knee flexion after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong Zhi Khow; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Merrill Lee; Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Effects of contact stress on patellarfemoral joint and quadriceps force in fixed and mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hyuck Min Kwon; Jin-Ah Lee; Yong-Gon Koh; Kwan Kyu Park; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 4.  Evidence-based surgical technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim; Anurag Mittal; Prashant Meshram; Woo Hyun Kim; Sang Min Choi
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-07

5.  Biomechanical effects of fixed-bearing femoral prostheses with different coronal positions in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pengcheng Ma; Aikeremujiang Muheremu; Siping Zhang; Qian Zheng; Wei Wang; Kan Jiang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.