Literature DB >> 30741463

Genetic counselors' perceptions of uncertainty in pretest counseling for genomic sequencing: A qualitative study.

Jessica Park1, Kimberly Zayhowski1, Ainsley J Newson2, Kelly E Ormond1,3.   

Abstract

Increased usage of exome and genome sequencing has made uncertainties associated with genomic sequencing methods more prevalent within medicine. Current research focuses on patients' perceptions of uncertainty related to genomic sequencing, but there is limited knowledge of the perspectives of providers. The aim of this study was to explore how professionals in genomics perceive uncertainties involved in genomic sequencing, and if or how this impacts their approach to pretest counseling. We performed 20 semi-structured interviews with genetic counselors in the United States and Canada who provide pretest genetic counseling for genomic sequencing. Interviews explored participating genetic counselors' views of uncertainty regarding genomic sequencing, how they classify it, how it manifests, and how they manage it during pretest counseling. Thematic analysis showed that genetic counselors acknowledge concepts of uncertainty that map to existing frameworks of uncertainty for genomic sequencing. Genetic counselors also perceived incongruencies between patients' and providers' expectations of genomic sequencing, which prompted them to modify patients' perceptions of uncertainty related to genomic sequencing. All genetic counselors agreed that guidance and strategies for genomic sequencing pretest counseling would be helpful, particularly for novice genetic counselors and non-genetics providers. These findings highlight the need and potential for conceptual models of uncertainty and uncertainty management strategies to facilitate patient-centered pretest counseling for genomic sequencing.
© 2019 National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetic counseling; genetic services; genetic testing; genomics; human genetics; uncertainty; whole exome sequencing; whole genome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30741463     DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  4 in total

1.  Referencing BRCA in hereditary cancer risk discussions: In search of an anchor in a sea of uncertainty.

Authors:  Margaret Waltz; Anya E R Prince; Julianne M O'Daniel; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Bradford C Powell; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Assessing women's preferences towards tests that may reveal uncertain results from prenatal genomic testing: Development of attributes for a discrete choice experiment, using a mixed-methods design.

Authors:  Jennifer Hammond; Jasmijn E Klapwijk; Sam Riedijk; Stina Lou; Kelly E Ormond; Ida Vogel; Lisa Hui; Emma-Jane Sziepe; James Buchanan; Charlotta Ingvoldstad-Malmgren; Maria Johansson Soller; Eleanor Harding; Melissa Hill; Celine Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Parental experiences of uncertainty following an abnormal fetal anomaly scan: Insights using Han's taxonomy of uncertainty.

Authors:  Jennifer Hammond; Jasmijn E Klapwijk; Melissa Hill; Stina Lou; Kelly E Ormond; Karin E M Diderich; Sam Riedijk; Celine Lewis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.717

4.  Dealing with uncertain results from chromosomal microarray and exome sequencing in the prenatal setting: An international cross-sectional study with healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Jennifer Hammond; Jasmijn E Klapwijk; Eleanor Harding; Stina Lou; Ida Vogel; Emma J Szepe; Lisa Hui; Charlotta Ingvoldstad-Malmgren; Maria J Soller; Kelly E Ormond; Mahesh Choolani; Melissa Hill; Sam Riedijk
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.050

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.