Literature DB >> 30741426

Toward a New Definition of Unmet Need for Contraception.

Sarah D Rominski, Rob Stephenson.   

Abstract

The current definition of unmet need for contraception assumes that all women who are using a method have a met need. We argue that without taking into account the level of satisfaction with a method, many women are classified as having a met need, when in fact they have an unmet need. They are using a method that does not meet their preferences, either because it causes side effects they find untenable or has other characteristics they do not like. Given the large number of contraceptive episodes that end in discontinuation, reportedly often due to the experience of side effects, we argue that the current definition of unmet need undercounts the number of women with a true unmet need for contraception as it misses the many women who are using a method that does not meet their preferences. We suggest the addition of satisfaction questions in national surveys such as the Demographic and Health Surveys to more fully assess the level of true met need for contraception.
© 2019 The Population Council, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30741426     DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Fam Plann        ISSN: 0039-3665


  5 in total

1.  Measuring contraceptive method mix, prevalence, and demand satisfied by age and marital status in 204 countries and territories, 1970-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

Authors:  Annie Haakenstad; Olivia Angelino; Caleb M S Irvine; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Kelly Bienhoff; Corinne Bintz; Kate Causey; M Ashworth Dirac; Nancy Fullman; Emmanuela Gakidou; Thomas Glucksman; Simon I Hay; Nathaniel J Henry; Ira Martopullo; Ali H Mokdad; John Everett Mumford; Stephen S Lim; Christopher J L Murray; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 202.731

2.  Incorporating Method Dissatisfaction into Unmet Need for Contraception: Implications for Measurement and Impact.

Authors:  Claire W Rothschild; Win Brown; Alison L Drake
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2021-02-17

3.  Catalyzing momentum in male contraceptive development†.

Authors:  Logan M Nickels; Kevin Shane; Heather L Vahdat
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Language and Measurement of Contraceptive Need and Making These Indicators More Meaningful for Measuring Fertility Intentions of Women and Girls.

Authors:  Ilene S Speizer; Jason Bremner; Shiza Farid
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2022-02-28

5.  Contributions of side effects to contraceptive discontinuation and method switch among Kenyan women: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  C W Rothschild; B A Richardson; B L Guthrie; P Kithao; T Omurwa; J Mukabi; L S Callegari; E L Lokken; G John-Stewart; J A Unger; J Kinuthia; A L Drake
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 7.331

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.