Literature DB >> 30741335

Optimising Radiation Therapy Dose to the Swallowing Organs at Risk: An In Silico Study of feasibility for Patients with Oropharyngeal Tumours.

Molly K Barnhart1,2, Bena Cartmill3,4, Elizabeth C Ward5,3, Elizabeth Brown6, Jonathon Sim7, George Saade7, Sandra Rayner7, Rachelle A Robinson8, Virginia A Simms8, Robert I Smee7,9.   

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that reducing radiotherapy dose delivered to specific anatomical swallowing structures [Swallowing Organs at Risk (SWOARs)] may improve swallowing outcomes post-treatment for patients with head and neck cancer. However, for those patients with tumours of the oropharynx, which typically directly overlap the SWOARs, reducing dose to these structures may be unachievable without compromising on the treatment of the disease. To assess the feasibility of dose reduction in this cohort, standard IMRT plans (ST-IMRT) and plans with reduced dose to the SWOARs (SW-IMRT) were generated for 25 oropharyngeal cancer patients (Brouwer et al. in Radiother Oncol 117(1):83-90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.041 , 2015; Christianen et al. in Radiother Oncol 101(3):394-402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.015 , 2011). ST-IMRT and SW-IMRT plans were compared for: mean dose to the SWOARs, volume of pharynx and larynx receiving 50 Gy and 60 Gy (V50 and V60 respectively) and overlap between the tumour volume and the SWOARs. Additionally, two different SWOARs delineation guidelines (Brouwer et al. in Radiother Oncol 117(1):83-90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.041 , 2015; Christianen et al. in Radiother Oncol 101(3):394-402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.015 , 2011) were used to highlight differences in calculated volumes between existing contouring guidelines. Agreement in SWOARs volumes between the two guidelines was calculated using a concordance index (CI). Despite a large overlap between the tumour and SWOARs, significant (p < 0.05) reductions in mean dose to 4 of the 5 SWOARs, and V50/V60 for the pharynx and larynx were achieved with SW-IMRT plans. Low CIs per structure (0.15-0.45) were found between the two guidelines highlighting issues comparing data between studies when different guidelines have been used (Hawkins et al. in Semin Radiat Oncol 28(1):46-52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.08.002 , 2018; Brodin et al. in Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 100(2):391-407, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.041 , 2018). This study found reducing dose to the SWOARs is a feasible practice for patients with oropharyngeal cancer. However, future prospective research is needed to determine if the extent of dose reduction achieved equates to clinical benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose optimisation; Dysphagia; Head and neck cancer; Radiation therapy planning; Swallowing organs at risk

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30741335     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-019-09983-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  36 in total

Review 1.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gustavo Nader Marta; Valter Silva; Heloisa de Andrade Carvalho; Fernando Freire de Arruda; Samir Abdallah Hanna; Rafael Gadia; João Luis Fernandes da Silva; Sebastião Francisco Miranda Correa; Carlos Eduardo Cintra Vita Abreu; Rachel Riera
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 2.  Dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and systemic therapies: Literature review and consensus.

Authors:  Antonio Schindler; Nerina Denaro; Elvio G Russi; Nicole Pizzorni; Paolo Bossi; Anna Merlotti; Massimo Spadola Bissetti; Gianmauro Numico; Alessandro Gava; Ester Orlandi; Orietta Caspiani; Michela Buglione; Daniela Alterio; Almalina Bacigalupo; Vitaliana De Sanctis; Giovanni Pavanato; Carla Ripamonti; Marco C Merlano; Lisa Licitra; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Johannes A Langendijk; Barbara Murphy
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 3.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the larynx and pharynx.

Authors:  Tiziana Rancati; Marco Schwarz; Aaron M Allen; Felix Feng; Aron Popovtzer; Bharat Mittal; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Systematic Review of Normal Tissue Complication Models Relevant to Standard Fractionation Radiation Therapy of the Head and Neck Region Published After the QUANTEC Reports.

Authors:  N Patrik Brodin; Rafi Kabarriti; Madhur K Garg; Chandan Guha; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher M Nutting; James P Morden; Kevin J Harrington; Teresa Guerrero Urbano; Shreerang A Bhide; Catharine Clark; Elizabeth A Miles; Aisha B Miah; Kate Newbold; MaryAnne Tanay; Fawzi Adab; Sarah J Jefferies; Christopher Scrase; Beng K Yap; Roger P A'Hern; Mark A Sydenham; Marie Emson; Emma Hall
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective investigation of acute swallowing and toxicity patterns.

Authors:  Laura B Moroney; Jennifer Helios; Elizabeth C Ward; Jane Crombie; Anita Pelecanos; Clare L Burns; Ann-Louise Spurgin; Claire Blake; Lizbeth Kenny; Benjamin Chua; Brett G M Hughes
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Swallowing sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy (SW-IMRT) in head and neck cancer: Clinical validation according to the model-based approach.

Authors:  Miranda E M C Christianen; Arjen van der Schaaf; Hans Paul van der Laan; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Patricia Doornaert; Olga Chouvalova; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Charles René Leemans; Sjoukje F Oosting; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Jan L N Roodenburg; Ben J Slotman; Hendrik P Bijl; Johannes A Langendijk
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) versus intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Jaiprakash Agarwal; Sandeep Jain; Reena Phurailatpam; Sadhana Kannan; Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar; Ketayun Dinshaw; Kumar Prabhash; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Anil D'Cruz
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 9.  Dysphagia-optimised Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Techniques in Pharyngeal Cancers: Is Anyone Going to Swallow it?

Authors:  I Petkar; S Bhide; K Newbold; K Harrington; C Nutting
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.126

10.  Patient-reported outcomes following parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. How important is dysphagia?

Authors:  Justin W G Roe; Michael J Drinnan; Paul N Carding; Kevin J Harrington; Christopher M Nutting
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.