| Literature DB >> 30740930 |
Lubomir T Lubomirov1, Hristo Gagov2, Mechthild M Schroeter1, Rudolf J Wiesner1,3, Andras Franko1,4,5.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder with high prevalence, and a major risk factor for macro- and microvascular abnormalities. This study was undertaken to explore the mechanisms of hypercontractility of murine femoral arteries (FA) obtained from mice with streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes and its relation to the phosphorylation profile of the myosin phosphatase target subunit 1, MYPT1. The immunoreactivity of MYPT1 toward phospho-MYPT1-T696, MYPT1-T853, or MYPT1-S695, used as a read out for MYPT1 phosphorylation, has been studied by Western Blotting. Contractile activity of FA from control and STZ mice has been studied by wire myography. At basal conditions (no treatment), the immunoreactivity of MYPT1-T696/T853 was ~2-fold higher in the STZ arteries compared with controls. No changes in MYPT1-T696/853 phosphorylation were observed after stimulation with the Thromboxan-A2 analog, U46619. Neither basal nor U46619-stimulated phosphorylation of MYPT1 at S695 was affected by STZ treatment. Mechanical distensibility and basal tone of FA obtained from STZ animals were similar to controls. Maximal force after treatment of FA with the contractile agonists phenylephrine (10 μmol/L) or U46619 (1 μmol/L) was augmented in the arteries of STZ mice by ~2- and ~1.5-fold, respectively. In summary, our study suggests that development of a hypercontractile phenotype in murine FA in STZ diabetes is at least partially related to an increase in phosphorylation of MLCP at MYPT1-T696/853. Interestingly, the phosphorylation at S695 site was not altered in STZ-induced diabetes, supporting the view that S695 may serve as a sensor for mechanical activity which is not directly involved in tone regulation.Entities:
Keywords: MYPT1 phosphorylation; streptozotocin-induced diabetes; vascular tone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30740930 PMCID: PMC6369311 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1STZ treatment increases MYPT1 phophosphorylation at T696 and T853 in FA, but not at S695. A: Original Western blots probed with phospho‐specific antibodies against MYPT1 phosphorylated at S695 (pMYPT1‐S695), T853 (pMYPT1‐T853), T696 (pMYPT1‐T696), and MYPT1 total in FA of control or STZ‐treated mice. Figure (B) represents the ratio of Coomassie blue R‐250‐stained Filamin on SDS‐PAGE used for normalization of the immunoreactive signal (loading control) toward myosin heavy chain, denoted on the figure as MHC or MYPT1 total. C, D, E: Ratios of pMYPT1‐S695, pMYPT1‐T853, and pMYPT1‐T696 toward Filamin. Phosphorylation was measured either in time‐matched controls (PSS, denoted as “No treatment”) or after 5 min treatment with 0.3 μmol/l U46619 as ** P<0.01; * P< 0.05; n.s.: not significant; two‐way ANOVA followed by Sidak's multiple comparison post‐test; scatter plot diagrams represent individual values of the ratio of phospho‐protein toward housekeeper ± SD; n = 5–6. Results: pMYPT1‐S695: n.s. in PSS (controls) versus PSS (STZ) and in U46619 (controls) versus U46619 (STZ). ** P<0.01 in PSS (controls) versus U46619 (controls) and PSS (STZ) versus U46619 (STZ). pMYPT1‐T853: * P< 0.05 in PSS (controls) versus PSS (STZ) and n.s. in U46619 (controls) versus U46619 (STZ). * P< 0.05 in PSS (controls) versus U46619 (controls) and n.s. in PSS (STZ) versus U46619 (STZ). pMYPT1‐T696: *P < 0.05 in PSS (controls) versus PSS (STZ) and ** P < 0.01 in U46619 (controls) versus U46619 (STZ).
Figure 2Modulation of Phenylephrine and U46619‐induced contraction in FA of control and STZ‐induced diabetic mice. Original force traces showing the contractile response of control (gray force tracing) and STZ (black) murine FA to increasing concentrations of (A) Phenylephrine (concentration range 0.1–10 μmol/l) or (B) U46619 (concentration range 0.001–3 μmol/l) in the absence or presence of 100 μmol/L L‐NAME. (C, D) Statistical evaluation of the dose–response curves for the effect of Phenylephrine and U46619 on vascular force development. Data represent absolute force in mN ± SD (n = 3–4 vessels from 3 to 4 animals; * *P < 0.05 or §P = 0.19: two‐way ANOVA, followed by Sidak's test for multiple comparisons).
Contractile parameters of FA obtained from control and STZ‐treated mice, stimulated with Phenylephrine or U46619
| Group | −log EC50 (no treatment) |
| −log EC50 (L‐NAME) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenylephrine (Controls) | ‐ | 2.3 ± 2.7 | ‐ | 3.0 ± 2.2 | 4 |
| Phenylephrine (STZ) | ‐ | 4.8 ± 2.7n.s. | ‐ | 8.1 ± 0.9* | 3 |
| U46619 (Controls) | 7.8 ± 0.2 | 8.8 ± 2.8 | 7.9 ± 0.3 | 6.9 ± 1.8 | 4 |
| U46619(STZ) | 7.7 ± 0.2 | 11.3 ± 3.1n.s. | 7.8 ± 0.1 | 9.9 ± 2.0§ | 3 |
Phenylephrine‐induced contraction was not tested at maximal compound concentration, thus the values pEC50 were not determined.
n.s.: No significant difference in F max in Phenylephrine (Controls) versus Phenylephrine (STZ) in the absence and *P<0.05 for F max in the presence of 100 μmol/L L‐NAME (two‐way ANOVA, followed by Sidak's test for multiple comparisons).
n.s.: No significant difference in F max in U46619 (Controls) versus U46619 (STZ) in the absence and § P = 0.19 for F max in the presence of 100 μmol/l L‐NAME (two‐way ANOVA, followed by Sidak's test for multiple comparisons).
n.s.: No significant difference in pEC50 of the preparations from control animals versus STZ has been measured.