Literature DB >> 30740487

Bioenergy production data from anaerobic digestion of thermally hydrolyzed organic fraction of municipal solid waste.

A S Razavi1, E Hosseini Koupaie1, A Azizi1, H Hafez2, E Elbeshbishy1.   

Abstract

The presented dataset in this data article provides quantitative data on the production of bioenergy (biogas and biomethane) from mesophilic batch anaerobic digestion (AD) of thermally hydrolyzed organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). The discussion and interpretation of the data are provided in another publication entitled "Hydrothermal Pretreatment of Source Separated Organics for Enhanced Solubilization and Biomethane Recovery" (Razavi et al., 2019). The data and information presented in the current data article include (1) the ratio of soluble to particulate chemical oxygen demand (COD) under different thermal hydrolysis condition, (2) the daily measured biogas and biomethane data, (3) the cumulative methane yield data in terms of mL CH4 produced per gram of volatile suspended solids (VSS) as well as feedstock added, (4) the ultimate methane yield data as well as the relative improvement in methane recovery compared to the control (non-hydrolyzed) digester, (5) the data of first-order organics biodegradation rate constants, (6) the procedure of measuring biogas composition via gas chromatography, (7) the procedure of converting the biogas/methane volume data acquired under the actual experimental condition (mesophilic temperature of 38 °C and atmospheric pressure) to the standard temperature (0 °C) and pressure (1 atm) condition, and (8) the procedure of determining the first-order kinetic rate constants.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30740487      PMCID: PMC6355964          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table Value of the data The data explain the procedure for converting the gas volume data obtained under specific experimental conditions (e.g., specific temperature and/or pressure) into the values under a standard condition (e.g. 0 °C, 1 atm). Data standardization provide the opportunity to compare the data acquired under different experimental conditions. The dataset covering a wide range of thermal hydrolysis conditions might be used as a benchmark to validate the findings of other studies. The data highlight the importance of selecting the optimum ranges of temperature, pressure, and retention time for thermal hydrolysis of OFMSW prior to the AD process. The kinetics rate data provide valuable information regarding the rate of the anaerobic digestion thermally hydrolyzed OFMSW.

Data

The ratio of soluble to particulate COD in the raw and thermally hydrolyzed OFMSW samples are compared in Fig. 1. The experimentally measured biogas and biomethane production data throughout the BMP experiment are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The cumulative biomethane yield in terms of mL CH4/g VSS-added and L CH4/L feedstock-added are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. The ultimate methane yield of the digesters fed with raw and thermally hydrolyzed substrates are compared in Fig. 4. The percentage improvements in the ultimate methane yield of the thermally hydrolyzed digesters in comparison with that of the control digester are shown in Fig. 5. The first-order specific biodegradation rate constants of the BMP digesters are presented in Fig. 6.
Fig. 1

The ratio of soluble to particulate COD.

Table 1

Daily biogas production data from the BMP digesters at a temperature of 38 °C (mL).

Time (day)Severity index (SI) temperature (°C)-holding time (min)
Control
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
150°C 30min160°C 20min170°C 10min170°C 30min180°C 15min190°C 10min190°C 20min200°C 10min210°C 10min210°C 20min220°C 10min230°C 05min220°C 30min230 °C 15min240°C 20min
00000000000000000
242544359473136263028274337454249
4991101111111056874546365567989787193
719920921021520712413410411910796116152118105153
9345355359367356179197160175164149166220176158209
13433451464473459274321292284309246344250324323360
15557577596607598424485439428453348496340430440465
17692711743758740620672624606622500634650560556600
20741755802815805760825794765761695733763690690660
22768783831846837815874846813831777782806760764680
27787803851865854857924894854878835823824836829713
30826844882897886889945920889906865851857856859735
35855873915933920920970942922917888871890880864765
38860885919936924941977956944927909891895888886780
41864891924939939958982969951936915897901900884785
Table 2

Daily biomethane production data from the BMP digesters at a temperature of 38 °C (mL).

Time (day)Severity index (SI) temperature (°C)-holding time (min)
Control
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
150°C 30min160°C 20min170°C 10min170°C 30min180°C 15min190°C 10min190°C 20min200°C 10min210°C 10min210°C 20min220°C 10min230°C 05min220°C 30min230°C 15min240°C 20min
00000000000000000
227352838312023172018182824292732
464727272684448354142365158514660
71291361371401358187687770627599776899
922423123323923111612810411410797108143114103136
13281293302307298178209190185201160224163211210234
15362375387395389276315285278294226322221280286302
17450462483493481403437406394404325412423364361390
20482491521530523494536516497495452476496449449429
22499509540550544530568550528540505508524494497442
27512522553562555557601581555571543535536543539463
30537549573583576578614598578589562553557556558478
35556567595606598598631612599596577566579572562497
38559575597608601612635621614603591579582577576507
41562579601610610623638630618608595583586585575510
Fig. 2

The cumulative methane yields of the BMP digesters as mL CH4/g VSS-added.

Fig. 3

The cumulative methane yields of the BMP digesters as L CH4/L feedstock-added.

Fig. 4

The ultimate methane yield as mL CH4/g VSS-added.

Fig. 5

Percentage improvement in ultimate methane yield compared to the control (non-pretreated) digester (%).

Fig. 6

First-order specific biodegradation rate constant of the raw and thermally hydrolyzed digesters.

The ratio of soluble to particulate COD. Daily biogas production data from the BMP digesters at a temperature of 38 °C (mL). Daily biomethane production data from the BMP digesters at a temperature of 38 °C (mL). The cumulative methane yields of the BMP digesters as mL CH4/g VSS-added. The cumulative methane yields of the BMP digesters as L CH4/L feedstock-added. The ultimate methane yield as mL CH4/g VSS-added. Percentage improvement in ultimate methane yield compared to the control (non-pretreated) digester (%). First-order specific biodegradation rate constant of the raw and thermally hydrolyzed digesters.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Procedure of volume data conversion to the standard temperature & pressure condition

The volume of the produced biogas/methane throughout the BMP assay under the mesophilic temperature of 38 °C and atmospheric room pressure was converted to the standard temperature & pressure condition (0 °C and 1 atm) using Eq. (1)where, : Biogas/methane volume of the at the standard temperature & pressure condition (mL) : Actual recorded biogas/methane volume (mL) : Actual atmospheric pressure at the time of recording the biogas/methane volume (atm) : Standard pressure (1 atm) : Standard temperature () : Digester temperature ()

Biodegradation kinetics rate calculation

The data regarding the rate of organics (COD, VSS, etc.) biodegradation through the digestion process were defined by the first-order reaction model [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Eq. (2) shows the kinetic reaction model used to calculate the first-order rate constants data for the TCOD degradation of the digesters.in which , , and are respectively the organics removal rate (e.g., TCOD degradation rate in mg/L.d), the first-order specific biodegradation rate constant (1/d), and the remaining concentration of organics (e.g., TCOD concentration in mg/L) at time t. By integrating and rearranging Eqs. (2) and (3) will be obtained as follows:in which is the ultimate biodegradable organics concentration (mg/L), and the rest of the parameters are as defined before.

Analytical procedure

The amount of the daily biogas production was measured manually using a 100 mL air-tight Poulten & Graf Fortuna™ glass syringe. The composition of the biogas produced throughout the BMP assay was measured in terms of CH4, CO2, and H2 gases using a gas chromatograph (Thermo Scientific Trace 1310). The Trace 1310 gas chromatograph was equipped with a packed column (model: TG-Bond Msieve 5A) with 30 m length and diameter of 0.53 mm. It was also utilized a thermal conductivity detector with oven, filament, and detector temperatures of 80, 250, and 100 °C, respectively. The analysis of COD was performed calorimetrically following the closed reflux methodology outlined by the Standard Methods [8]. A Hach spectrophotometer (model DR3900) was used for COD analysis and the measurements were done at the wavelength at 600 nm. The statistical analysis was performed using Minitab Software 17.
Subject areaEnvironmental engineering
More specific subject areaAnaerobic digestion, biological treatment, thermal hydrolysis, waste minimization, bioenergy
Type of dataTable, figures
How data were acquiredThe gas chromatography was employed to determine the methane content of the produced biogas. A Hach spectrophotometer (model DR3900) was used the analysis the chemical oxygen demand (COD) of the samples calorimetrically. The volume of the produced biogas was measured manually with a Poulten & Graf Fortuna™ air-sealed glass syringe (capacity of 100 m) throughout the biochemical methane potential (BMP) assay. To analyze the soluble COD (SCOD), the samples were centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000 rpm using a Sorvall Legend XT centrifuge (Fisher Scientific, US). Then, the liquid fraction (supernatant) of the centrifuged samples was passed through 0.45 µm microfiber filters. The analysis including the analysis of ANOVA and the interactions analysis was done using Minitab Software 17.
Data formatRaw, analyzed
Experimental factorsThermal hydrolysis parameters include temperature (°C), holding time (min), pressure (kPa), and severity index (–). All the digesters were operated at the mesophilic temperature of 38 °C.
Experimental featuresThermal hydrolysis experiments were conducted under wide ranges of temperature, retention time, and pressure so that it covers the severity index range of 3–5 commonly used in industrial applications. Fifteen different thermal hydrolysis conditions were applied to the OFMSW samples. The thermal hydrolysis temperature, pressure, and holding time ranged from 150 to 240 °C, 476 to 3367 kPa, and 5 to 30 min, respectively. The BMP test was performed using raw (non-pretreated) and thermally hydrolyzed OFMSW samples. The BMP assay as well as the sample analyses were performed in triplicates.
Data source locationToronto, Canada
Data accessibilityData are presented in this article
Related research articleA.S. Razavi, E. Hosseini Koupaie, A. Azizi, H. Hafez, E. Elbeshbishy, Hydrothermal pretreatment of source separated organics for enhanced solubilization and biomethane recovery, Bioresour. Technol. [1]
  5 in total

Review 1.  Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: a review.

Authors:  H Carrère; C Dumas; A Battimelli; D J Batstone; J P Delgenès; J P Steyer; I Ferrer
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 10.588

2.  Hydrothermal pretreatment of source separated organics for enhanced solubilization and biomethane recovery.

Authors:  A S Razavi; E Hosseini Koupaie; A Azizi; H Hafez; E Elbeshbishy
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 3.  Pretreatment of food waste for methane and hydrogen recovery: A review.

Authors:  Obulisamy Parthiba Karthikeyan; Eric Trably; Sanjeet Mehariya; Nicolas Bernet; Jonathan W C Wong; Hélène Carrere
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Hydrothermal processing as pretreatment for efficient production of ethanol and biogas from municipal solid waste.

Authors:  Peyman Mahmoodi; Keikhosro Karimi; Mohammad J Taherzadeh
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  Comparison of Different Electricity-Based Thermal Pretreatment Methods for Enhanced Bioenergy Production from Municipal Sludge.

Authors:  E Hosseini Koupaie; T Johnson; C Eskicioglu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.