Literature DB >> 30740025

Dragonfly biodiversity 90 years ago in an Alpine region: The Odonata historical collection of the MUSE (Trento, Italy).

Giacomo Assandri1, Alessandra Franceschini1, Valeria Lencioni1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Historical collections of natural science museums play a fundamental role in documenting environmental changes and patterns of biodiversity transformation. This considered, they should have a pivotal role to plan conservation and management actions.The MUSE - Science Museum of Trento is an Italian regional museum preserving about 5.5 million items (organised in 297 collections). About one million of them are invertebrates, 70% of which are of local origin, gathered in the collection "Miscellanea Invertebrati". Odonata account for a minor part of this collection; however, most of them are of local or regional relevance. A complete catalogue of this collection does not exist to date. NEW INFORMATION: The collection was studied in 2017-2018 and this contribution aims to present the Catalogue of the historic collection of Odonata of the MUSE - Museo delle Scienze of Trento (Italy).In all, 836 specimens of adult dragonflies and damselflies are found in the collection referring to an overall 56 species. The collection covers a period between 1924 and 1957 and refer to 74 defined localities, all located in northern Italy (most of them in Trentino - Alto Adige Region).The samples conserved in the collection are, for several species, the only indisputable confirmation of their former occurrence in that region.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trentino-Alto Adige; dragonflies; damselflies; Italy; natural science museum

Year:  2019        PMID: 30740025      PMCID: PMC6367308          DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e32391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodivers Data J        ISSN: 1314-2828


Introduction

The MUSE - Science Museum of Trento (formerly Museo Tridentino di Scienze Naturali) is an Italian regional museum founded in 1922. The natural history and archaeological collections of the museum (297 collections and 5.5 million objects) are of great interest for their close relationship with the Alpine Region. The oldest materials were collected more than two centuries ago and the collections increase every year through many new acquisitions. Invertebrate collections of the MUSE include more than 1.2 million specimens, aquatic and terrestrial, 70% of which are of local origin. Historical collections (1850-1950) include mainly terrestrial insects. account for a minor part of the "Miscellanea Invertebrati" collection (cINV017), with 954 specimens collected since 1924, mostly in Trentino (NE-Italy). The bulk of the collection (836 specimens) was created between 1924 and 1957 and is referred hereafter as the 'historical collection of dragonflies of the Science Museum (MUSE) of Trento'. The remaining samples refer to 2009 and were collected at two sites of Trentino in the framework of a specific project, the results from which have already been reported in Lampo et al. (2011). Hence, this contribution intends to present the catalogue of the historical bulk of the collection. The dragonflies in the Museo Tridentino di Scienze Naturali collection were previously studied by Cesare Nielsen in 1932, who reported the available records at that time (which were a small number compared to the ones available today) (Nielsen 1932). They were subsequently studied by Cesare Conci and Osvaldo Galvagni in 1944, who only reported several relevant data for an individual species, (Brauer, 1882) (Conci and Galvagni 1944). This considered, we think it important to publish the full catalogue of the historical collection of dragonflies of the Science Museum of Trento, since these data represent the first organic and verifiable bulk of knowledge on the of Trentino. In fact, apart from two 19th century very general and not verifiable studies (Ambrosi 1851, Ausserer 1869), no other previous information exists which allow the delineation of the past odonate fauna of this area. Additionally, during the 34 years to which the records in this collection refer, few data on the of Trentino were published and most of them referred only to scarce species (i.e. apart from those already cited: Morton 1926, Conci and Galvagni 1946, Conci 1957, Conci 1948, Morton 1928, Marcuzzi 1948). Historical data from the Natural Science Museum collections allow comparisons with present animal assemblages and enable the understanding of the dynamics of the communities (i.e. species extinctions and colonisations) and concurrently of ecosystems (Regneire et al. 2015). These modifications could be the result of natural processes or, more often, of the anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity; thus, collection data play a fundamental role in documenting environmental changes (Schmitt et al. 2018). This also explains their invaluable importance in planning conservation and management actions (Remsen 1995, Gobbi et al. 2012). As an example, of the 61 odonate species recorded in Trentino, four (, , and ) were not reported after 1950 (Assandri, unpublished data). For all of them, at least one sample is conserved in the historical collection of dragonflies of the MUSE, confirming their indisputable former occurrence in that region.

Sampling methods

Study extent

The historical specimens of conserved in the collection "Miscellanea Invertebrati" of MUSE are 836 referring to 74 localities. Specimens are contained in a total of 44 entomological boxes.

Sampling description

No data on sampling protocols used in the past were available, although it is likely that most of the specimens derived from opportunistic sampling performed by personnel of the Museum, in particular by Guido Castelli and Tullio Perini, in Trentino Alto-Adige. Few specimens come from donations by other entomologists. The collection is kept dry, most of the specimens are pinned (N=737), whereas the others are conserved in dragonfly envelopes (N=99).

Quality control

The collection was studied by GA in 2017-2018. All the samples were revised and reordered. A point of strength of the collection is that labels are mostly conserved and complete, thus relevant data about date and locality are available. These were digitalised. Geographical data on labels were georeferenced based on locality names. In most cases, the localities were well defined and straightforward for georeferencing as they referred to specific physical elements (lakes, mountains, wetlands). When the locality referred to a town or a city, we associated it with the approximate present centroid of the urban area, although it could have been more vague (e.g. referred to the municipality). When the information is too imprecise for georeferencing (e.g. valleys) or unclear, we do not provide coordinates. Taxonomy and nomenclature in this paper and associated dataset follow Boudot and Kalkman (2015).

Geographic coverage

Description

All the specimens, deposited in the collection "Miscellanea Invertebrati" of MUSE, geographically refer to Northern Italy. Most of them come Central-Eastern Alps, specifically from Trentino (N=692) and Alto Adige (N=138). Another 3 specimens come from Veneto (all 3 ), 1 from Lombardia () and 2 from Liguria () (Fig. 1A). Overall, data for 74 localities are available (collection effort per locality: 1-122 Fig. 1B).
Figure 1.

Geographical distribution of the specimens conserved in the MUSE "Miscellanea invertebrati" collection. A. All specimens. Base-map: Northern Italy - USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed October 2017; B. Focus on Trentino - Alto Adige region with number of specimens per locality detailed (N=825).

Specimens refer to an altitudinal gradient between 66 and 2600 m a.s.l., although the 86% of them were collected at low elevation (within 1000 m a.s.l.) (Fig. 2). Considering that most of the data came from a region which extends for 70% above 1000 m a.s.l. (Rossi 2005), this evidence suggests a possible disproportionate sampling tendency towards the valley bottom, while admitting that the diversity of dragonflies in the Alps is concentrated at lower altitudes.
Figure 2.

Altitudinal distribution of specimens in the MUSE "Miscellanea invertebrati" collection (N=815).

Coordinates

44.449 and 46.815 Latitude; 12.265 and 9.012 Longitude.

Taxonomic coverage

A total of 56 species are represented in the MUSE "Miscellanea Invertebrati" collection (Fig. 3). Those represent 59% of the 95 species recorded at least once in Italy (http://www.odonata.it/libe-italiane) and 39% of the 143 species recorded in Europe (Boudot and Kalkman 2015).
Figure 3.

Number of specimens in the MUSE "Miscellanea invertebrati" collection divided by species (N=836).

Traits coverage

Data coverage of traits

PLEASE FILL IN TRAIT INFORMATION HERE

Temporal coverage

Notes

The specimens deposited in the MUSE "Miscellanea invertebrati collection" cover a timespan of 34 years between 1924 and 1957 (Fig. 4). This motivated the name ("historical") chosen to designate this collection as an unique entity, which in fact is the result of heterogeneous entomological activities carried on by different collectors. It is noteworthy to mention the almost total cessation of the collecting activities during the years of World War II (1940-1945).
Figure 4.

Temporal distribution of specimens in the MUSE "Miscellanea invertebrati" collection (N=835).

Collection data

Collection name

"Miscellanea invertebrati" - MUSE

Collection identifier

cINV017

Parent collection identifier

MUSE

Specimen preservation method

Dried specimens (pinned; dragonfly envelopes).

Usage rights

Use license

Creative Commons Public Domain Waiver (CC-Zero)

IP rights notes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License.

Data resources

Data package title

Historical collection of dragonflies ( : ) of the Science Museum (MUSE) of Trento

Resource link

http://ipt.pensoft.net/resource?r=muse_odonata

Number of data sets

1

Data set 1.

Data set name

Historical collection of dragonflies ( : ) of the Science Museum (MUSE) of Trento

Data format

Darwin Core

Number of columns

41

Additional information

Assandri G (2018): Dragonfly biodiversity 90 years ago in an Alpine region: The historical collection of the MUSE (Trento, Italy). v1.6. Biodiversity Data Journal. Dataset/Occurrence. http://ipt.pensoft.net/resource?r=muse_odonata
RankScientific Name
kingdom Animalia
phylum Artropoda
class Insecta
order Odonata
speciesAeshna affinis Vander Linden, 1820
speciesAeshna cyanea (Müller, 1764)
speciesAeshna grandis (Linnaeus, 1758)
speciesAeshna juncea (Linnaeus, 1758)
speciesAeshna mixta (Latreille, 1805)
speciesAnax imperator Leach, 1815
speciesBrachytron pratense (Müller, 1764)
speciesCalopteryx splendens (Harris, 1780)
speciesCalopteryx virgo (Linnaeus, 1758)
speciesCalopteryx xanthostoma (Charpentier, 1825)
speciesChalcolestes viridis (Vander Linden, 1825)
speciesCoenagrion puella (Linnaeus, 1758)
speciesCoenagrion pulchellum (Vander Linden, 1825)
speciesCoenagrion scitulum (Rambur, 1842)
speciesCordulegaster bidentata Selys, 1843
speciesCordulegaster boltonii (Donovan, 1807)
speciesCordulia aenea (Linnaeus, 1758)
speciesCrocothemis erythraea (Brullé, 1832)
speciesEnallagma cyathigerum (Charpentier, 1840)
speciesErythromma lindenii (Selys, 1840)
speciesErythromma najas (Hansemann, 1823)
speciesErythromma viridulum (Charpentier, 1840)
speciesGomphus vulgatissimus (Linnaeus, 1758)
speciesIschnura elegans (Vander Linden, 1820)
speciesLestes barbarus (Fabricius, 1798)
speciesLestes virens (Charpentier, 1825)
speciesLestes dryas (Kirby, 1890)
speciesLestes sponsa (Hansemann, 1823)
speciesLestes virens (Charpentier, 1825)
speciesLeucorrhinia dubia (Vander Linden, 1825)
speciesLeucorrhinia pectoralis (Charpentier, 1825)
speciesLibellula depressa Linnaeus, 1758
speciesLibellula fulva (Müller, 1764)
speciesLibellula quadrimaculata Linnaeus, 1758
speciesOnychogomphus forcipatus (Linnaeus, 1758)
speciesOrthetrum albistylum (Selys, 1848)
speciesOrthetrum brunneum (Fonscolombe, 1837)
speciesOrthetrum cancellatum (Linnaeus, 1758)
speciesOrthetrum coerulescens (Fabricius, 1798)
speciesPlatycnemis pennipes (Pallas, 1771)
speciesPyrrhosoma nymphula (Sulzer, 1776)
speciesSomatochlora alpestris (Selys, 1840)
speciesSomatochlora arctica (Zetterstedt, 1840)
speciesSomatochlora flavomaculata (Vander Linden, 1825)
speciesSomatochlora metallica (Vander Linden, 1825)
speciesSympecma fusca (Vander Linden, 1820)
speciesSympecma paedisca (Brauer, 1877)
speciesSympetrum danae (Sulzer, 1776)
speciesSympetrum depressiusculum (Selys, 1841)
speciesSympetrum flaveolum (Linnaeus, 1758)
speciesSympetrum fonscolombii (Selys, 1840)
speciesSympetrum meridionale (Selys, 1841)
speciesSympetrum pedemontanum (Müller in Allioni, 1766)
speciesSympetrum sanguineum (Müller, 1764)
speciesSympetrum striolatum (Charpentier, 1840)
speciesSympetrum vulgatum (Linnaeus, 1758)
Data set 1.
Column labelColumn description
typeThe nature of the resource
languageThe language of the resource
institutionCodeThe name in use by the institution having custody of the object or information referred to in the record
collectionCodeThe name and acronym identifying the collection from which the record was derived
datasetNameThe name identifying the dataset from which the record was derived
basisOfRecordThe specific nature of the data record
dynamicPropertiesbox: the entomological box number in which the specimen is conserved
catalogNumberAn unique identifier for the record within the dataset and collection
occurrenceRemarksNotes about the Occurrence
recordedByA person responsible for recording the original Occurrence (legit)
individualCountThe number of specimen available for an Occurrence
sexThe sex of the specimen represented in the Occurrence
lifeStageThe age class or life stage of the specimen of the Occurrence
preparationsPreparations and preservation methods for the specimen
eventDateDate when the specimen was collected (according to label)
yearThe four-digit year in which the Event occurred, according to the Common Era Calendar
monthThe ordinal month in which the Event occurred
dayThe integer day of the month on which the Event occurred
continentThe name of the continent in which the Location occurs
countryThe name of the country in which the Location occurs
stateProvinceThe name of the next smaller administrative region than country (region) in which the Location occurs
countyThe name of the next smaller administrative region than stateProvince (Province) in which the Location occurs
municipalityThe full, unabbreviated name of the next smaller administrative region than county (municipality) in which the Location occurs
localityThe specific description of the place. This term may contain information modified from the original to correct perceived errors or to standardise the description.
verbatimLocalityThe original textual description of the place
verbatimElevationThe original description of the elevation (altitude, usually above sea level) of the Location
minimumElevationInMetersThe lower limit of the range of elevation (altitude, usually above sea level), in metres. This is referred to georeferenced Location
decimalLatitudeThe geographic latitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic centre of a Location
decimalLongitudeThe geographic longitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic centre of a Location
geodeticDatumThe geodetic datum upon which the geographic coordinates given in decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude as based
georeferencedByWho determined the georeference (spatial representation) for the Location
georeferenceVerificationStatusA categorical description of the extent to which the georeference has been verified to represent the best possible spatial description
identifiedByA list (concatenated and separated) of names of people who assigned the Taxon to the subject
scientificNameThe full scientific name, with authorship and date information
orderThe full scientific name of the order in which the taxon is classified
taxonRankThe taxonomic rank of the most specific name in the scientificName
occurrenceIDA globally unique identifier for the Occurrence
genusThe full scientific name of the genus in which the taxon is classified
specificEpithetThe name of the first or species epithet of the scientificName
infraspecificEpithetThe name of the lowest or terminal infraspecific epithet of the scientificName, excluding any rank designation
scientificNameAuthorshipThe authorship information for the scientificName formatted according to the conventions of the applicable nomenclaturalCode
  2 in total

1.  Mass extinction in poorly known taxa.

Authors:  Claire Régnier; Guillaume Achaz; Amaury Lambert; Robert H Cowie; Philippe Bouchet; Benoît Fontaine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Museum specimens of terrestrial vertebrates are sensitive indicators of environmental change in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  C Jonathan Schmitt; Joseph A Cook; Kelly R Zamudio; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Sixty years of work on Italy's Orthopteroids biodiversity, the big data of Galvagni collection.

Authors:  Filippo Maria Maria Buzzetti; Gionata Stancher; Federico Marangoni
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2021-06-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.