Literature DB >> 30739997

Improving the Prediction of African Savanna Vegetation Variables Using Time Series of MODIS Products.

Miriam Tsalyuk1, Maggi Kelly1, Wayne M Getz1,2.   

Abstract

African savanna vegetation is subject to extensive degradation as a result of rapid climate and land use change. To better understand these changes detailed assessment of vegetation structure is needed across an extensive spatial scale and at a fine temporal resolution. Applying remote sensing techniques to savanna vegetation is challenging due to sparse cover, high background soil signal, and difficulty to differentiate between spectral signals of bare soil and dry vegetation. In this paper, we attempt to resolve these challenges by analyzing time series of four MODIS Vegetation Products (VPs): Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Leaf Area Index (LAI), and Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FPAR) for Etosha National Park, a semiarid savanna in north-central Namibia. We create models to predict the density, cover, and biomass of the main savanna vegetation forms: grass, shrubs, and trees. To calibrate remote sensing data we developed an extensive and relatively rapid field methodology and measured herbaceous and woody vegetation during both the dry and wet seasons. We compared the efficacy of the four MODIS-derived VPs in predicting vegetation field measured variables. We then compared the optimal time span of VP time series to predict ground-measured vegetation. We found that Multiyear Partial Least Square Regression (PLSR) models were superior to single year or single date models. Our results show that NDVI-based PLSR models yield robust prediction of tree density (R2 =0.79, relative Root Mean Square Error, rRMSE=1.9%) and tree cover (R2 =0.78, rRMSE=0.3%). EVI provided the best model for shrub density (R2 =0.82) and shrub cover (R2 =0.83), but was only marginally superior over models based on other VPs. FPAR was the best predictor of vegetation biomass of trees (R2 =0.76), shrubs (R2 =0.83), and grass (R2 =0.91). Finally, we addressed an enduring challenge in the remote sensing of semiarid vegetation by examining the transferability of predictive models through space and time. Our results show that models created in the wetter part of Etosha could accurately predict trees' and shrubs' variables in the drier part of the reserve and vice versa. Moreover, our results demonstrate that models created for vegetation variables in the dry season of 2011 could be successfully applied to predict vegetation in the wet season of 2012. We conclude that extensive field data combined with multiyear time series of MODIS vegetation products can produce robust predictive models for multiple vegetation forms in the African savanna. These methods advance the monitoring of savanna vegetation dynamics and contribute to improved management and conservation of these valuable ecosystems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI); Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FPAR); Leaf Area Index (LAI); Model Transferability; Partial Least Square Regression (PLSR); Vegetation Cover

Year:  2017        PMID: 30739997      PMCID: PMC6368348          DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens        ISSN: 0924-2716            Impact factor:   8.979


  5 in total

1.  Determinants of woody cover in African savannas.

Authors:  Mahesh Sankaran; Niall P Hanan; Robert J Scholes; Jayashree Ratnam; David J Augustine; Brian S Cade; Jacques Gignoux; Steven I Higgins; Xavier Le Roux; Fulco Ludwig; Jonas Ardo; Feetham Banyikwa; Andries Bronn; Gabriela Bucini; Kelly K Caylor; Michael B Coughenour; Alioune Diouf; Wellington Ekaya; Christie J Feral; Edmund C February; Peter G H Frost; Pierre Hiernaux; Halszka Hrabar; Kristine L Metzger; Herbert H T Prins; Susan Ringrose; William Sea; Jörg Tews; Jeff Worden; Nick Zambatis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The carbon balance of Africa: synthesis of recent research studies.

Authors:  P Ciais; A Bombelli; M Williams; S L Piao; J Chave; C M Ryan; M Henry; P Brender; R Valentini
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  An effective approach for gap-filling continental scale remotely sensed time-series.

Authors:  Daniel J Weiss; Peter M Atkinson; Samir Bhatt; Bonnie Mappin; Simon I Hay; Peter W Gething
Journal:  ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 8.979

4.  A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets.

Authors:  Neil A White; Richard M Engeman; Robert T Sugihara; Heather W Krupa
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 2.964

Review 5.  Woody encroachment and forest degradation in sub-Saharan Africa's woodlands and savannas 1982-2006.

Authors:  Edward T A Mitchard; Clara M Flintrop
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Associations of Residential Greenness with Depression and Anxiety in Rural Chinese Adults.

Authors:  Niu Di; Shanshan Li; Hao Xiang; Yinyu Xie; Zhenxing Mao; Jian Hou; Xiaotian Liu; Wenqian Huo; Boyi Yang; Guanghui Dong; Chongjian Wang; Gongbo Chen; Yuming Guo
Journal:  Innovation (Camb)       Date:  2020-11-02

2.  Disease or drought: environmental fluctuations release zebra from a potential pathogen-triggered ecological trap.

Authors:  Yen-Hua Huang; Hendrina Joel; Martina Küsters; Zoe R Barandongo; Claudine C Cloete; Axel Hartmann; Pauline L Kamath; J Werner Kilian; John K E Mfune; Gabriel Shatumbu; Royi Zidon; Wayne M Getz; Wendy C Turner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Habitat complexity and lifetime predation risk influence mesopredator survival in a multi-predator system.

Authors:  Laura C Gigliotti; Rob Slotow; Luke T B Hunter; Julien Fattebert; Craig Sholto-Douglas; David S Jachowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.