Satoshi Furukawa1, Naho Tsuji1, Akihiko Sugiyama2. 1. Biological Research Laboratories, Nissan Chemical Corporation, 1470 Shiraoka, Shiraoka-shi, Saitama 349-0294, Japan. 2. Veterinary Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Okayama University of Science, 1-3 Ikoinooka, Imabari, Ehime794-8555, Japan.
Abstract
The placenta plays a pivotal role in fetal growth, and placental dysfunction and injury are associated with embryo/fetal toxicity. Histological examination of the rat placenta for safety evaluation provides valuable clues to the mechanisms of this toxicity. However, the placenta has specific and complex biological features unlike those of other organs, and placental structure dramatically changes depending on the time during the gestation period. Thus, time-dependent histopathological examination of the rat placenta should be performed based on the understanding of normal developmental changes in morphology and function. The placentas of rats and humans are both anatomically classified as discoid and hemochorial types. However, there are differences between rats and humans in terms of placental histological structure, the fetal-maternal interface, and the function of the yolk sac. Therefore, extrapolation of placental toxicity from rats to humans should be done cautiously in the evaluation of risk factors. This review describes the development, morphology, physiology, and toxicological features of the rat placenta and the differences between the rat and human placenta to enable accurate evaluation of reproductive and developmental toxicity in studies.
The placenta plays a pivotal role in fetal growth, and placental dysfunction and injury are associated with embryo/fetal toxicity. Histological examination of the rat placenta for safety evaluation provides valuable clues to the mechanisms of this toxicity. However, the placenta has specific and complex biological features unlike those of other organs, and placental structure dramatically changes depending on the time during the gestation period. Thus, time-dependent histopathological examination of the rat placenta should be performed based on the understanding of normal developmental changes in morphology and function. The placentas of rats and humans are both anatomically classified as discoid and hemochorial types. However, there are differences between rats and humans in terms of placental histological structure, the fetal-maternal interface, and the function of the yolk sac. Therefore, extrapolation of placental toxicity from rats to humans should be done cautiously in the evaluation of risk factors. This review describes the development, morphology, physiology, and toxicological features of the rat placenta and the differences between the rat and human placenta to enable accurate evaluation of reproductive and developmental toxicity in studies.
The placenta plays a pivotal role in fetal growth even though it is a temporary organ
during pregnancy. It is the interface between the dam and developing embryo/fetus and is a
multifunctional organ that serves as the liver, lung, gut, kidney, and endocrine/exocrine
glands. Its functions include anchoring the developing fetus to the uterine wall, mediating
maternal immune tolerance, hormone production, nutrient uptake, waste elimination, and gas
exchange via the maternal blood supply during embryonic/fetal development[1]. Furthermore, the placenta serves as a
protective barrier that protects the embryo/fetus against chemical injury. Placental
dysfunction and injury have adverse effects on the maintenance of pregnancy and fetal
development[2]. Detection of chemically
induced placental damage in rats provides a valuable clue to the mechanisms of embryo/fetal
toxicity in safety evaluation. Therefore, the placenta is an important organ for evaluating
reproductive and developmental toxicity[3].The large placental surface area comes in contact with a relatively large volume of
maternal blood[4]. The placenta, which is
rich in protein, may bioconcentrate chemical residues by means of protein binding and
release these residues into the placental circulation. Due to these biological features, the
placenta is vulnerable to toxicants, and placental toxicity has been reported for many
chemicals and other factors (Table 1). However, the placenta has not received proper consideration as a target
organ in safety evaluation of risks for dams and embryos/fetuses, because the placenta has
the following complex biological features: a) a complicated structure composed of multiple
tissues[5], b) drastic changes in
placental structure and function over time due to rapid development, and c) wide variations
of placental structure among different animal species[6]. Additionally, the placentas of both rats and humans are anatomically
classified as discoid and hemochorial types. However, there are differences between rats and
humans in terms of the placental histological structure, the fetal-maternal interface, and
the function of the yolk sac (Table 2). Therefore, extrapolation of placental toxicity from rats to humans should be
done cautiously in the evaluation of risk factors. This review describes the development,
morphology, physiology, and toxicological features of the rat placenta and the species-based
differences between the rat and human placenta to enable accurate evaluation of the effect
of reproductive and developmental toxicity in studies.
Table 1.
Chemicals Toxic to the Placenta
Table 2.
Morphological Differences Between the Rat and Human Placenta
Normal Development of the Rat Placenta
Table 3 shows the reproductive data (embryonal/fetal weight, placental weight,
embryonal/fetal placental weight ratio, etc.) of 171 dams from gestation day (GD) 11 (GD 0
is designated as the day when the presence of a vaginal plug is identified) to GD 21 in
control groups from our previous studies using Wistar Hannover rats. The placental weights
gradually increase with pregnancy progression and reach a plateau on GD 19, whereas the
fetal weights rapidly increase from GD 17 to GD 21[7], [8]. The
placental weight is approximately equal to the fetal weight on GD 15 and declines to
one-fourth on GD 17 and one-tenth on GD 21. Figure
1 shows the time-dependent macroscopic changes in placental diameter in Crl:CD (SD)
rats. The minor axis and thickness reach a plateau on GD 17, and the major axis gradually
increases until GD 21.
Table 3.
Reproductive Data of Wistar Han Rats During Pregnancy
Fig. 1.
Time-dependent changes in diameter and thickness of each part of the placenta in
rats. Left, placental diameter on GD 15, 17, and 21 in Crl:CD(SD) rats. Error bar
represents SD. Right, thickness of each part of the placenta from GD 11 to GD 21 in
Wistar Han rats.
Time-dependent changes in diameter and thickness of each part of the placenta in
rats. Left, placental diameter on GD 15, 17, and 21 in Crl:CD(SD) rats. Error bar
represents SD. Right, thickness of each part of the placenta from GD 11 to GD 21 in
Wistar Han rats.
Embryology, Morphology, and Physiology of the Rat Placenta
The rat placenta is histologically divided into a fetal part and a maternal part[5]. The fetal part is composed of the labyrinth
zone, basal zone (also referred to as the junctional zone), and yolk sac. The maternal part
is composed of the decidua and metrial gland. Figure 1
and 2 show the respective time-dependent thickness and biological features of each part of
the placenta. Developmentally, the trophectoderm, which differentiates into the placenta,
consists of the mural trophectoderm and polar trophectoderm. The mural trophectoderm
surrounding the blastocyst cavity arrests cell division and differentiates into primary
trophoblastic giant cells just after implantation. The polar trophectoderm forms the
ectoplacental cone and invades the decidua. The edge and center of the ectoplacental cone
differentiate into the basal zone (Fig. 3)[9]. The chorionic plate, which is the
membrane of the ectoplacental cone on the embryonic side, differentiates into the labyrinth
zone. In the endometrium, the decidua is derived from endometrial stromal cells by
stimulation of decidualization. The decidua rapidly grows and fills the uterus. Primary
decidualization takes place on the anti-mesometrial side in response to implantation of the
blastocyst. This is followed by secondary decidualization on the mesometrial side. The
metrial gland is composed of nodular aggregates of heterogeneous tissue that develop in the
mesometrial triangle in the uterine wall[9].
Figure 4 shows the process of overall morphological development of the placenta with the
events in each stage from GD 7 to GD 21.
Morphological development of the rat placenta and histological events at each
point. BZ, Basal zone; GC, Glycogen cell; ICM, Inner cell mass; LZ, Labyrinth zone; MG, Metrial gland; Tb, Trophoblast; YS, Yolk sac. HE stain.
Biological features of each part of the placenta in rats.Morphology of the embryo on GD 9.5. HE stain. AC, amniotic cavity; Al, allantois;
Am, amnion; Ch, chorionic plate; EcC, ectoplacental cone; Em, embryo; ExC, exocoelomic
cavity; PDZ, primary decidual zone; PG, primary trophoblastic giant cell; RM,
Reichert’s membrane; SDZ, secondary decidual zone; YS, yolk sac.Morphological development of the rat placenta and histological events at each
point. BZ, Basal zone; GC, Glycogen cell; ICM, Inner cell mass; LZ, Labyrinth zone; MG, Metrial gland; Tb, Trophoblast; YS, Yolk sac. HE stain.
1) Fetal part of the placenta
(1) Labyrinth zone
• Morphology
The labyrinth zone rests atop the flat, broad chorionic plate and is a thick vascular
plate that serves as the terminus for the umbilical cord[10]. It is composed of the maternal sinusoids, trophoblastic
septa, and fetal capillaries. In the trophoblastic septa, the outer trophectoderm, which
comes into direct contact with the maternal blood, is referred to as the cytotrophoblast
with a microvillous surface. Under this trophectoderm, there are two layers of
syncytiotrophoblasts (syncytiotrophoblast I and syncytiotrophoblast II from the maternal
sinusoid side) (Fig. 5 and 6). The continuity of the syncytiotrophoblast layer provides a placental
barrier[11]. Connexin 26 is
localized in the gap junctions connecting the two syncytiotrophoblast layers and allows
these layers to act functionally as a single syncytial layer for the transfer of small
molecules across the placental barrier[12] (Fig. 5). The maternal
sinusoids filled with blood cells are formed amid these cells. Developmentally, the
trophectoderm layer appears on GD 10 and is occupied by syncytiotrophoblasts and
cytotrophoblasts[13]. There is a
decrease in the cellular density in the trophoblastic septa and an increase in the size
of the cytotrophoblast with pregnancy progression (Fig. 6). The cellular proliferative activity of the trophoblasts is at its
peak on GD 13 and then gradually decreases until GD 21[14] (Fig. 7). In response to this, the labyrinth zone develops with advancing pregnancy and
forms the majority of the fetal part of the placenta (Fig. 1).
Fig. 5.
Expression of GLUT1 and GLUT3 in trophoblastic septa. Left, schema of
trophoblastic septa. Pathway of glucose via GLUT1 and GLUT3. Upper right,
immunohistochemical expression of GLUT1. Bar=100 µm. Lower right,
immunohistochemical expression of GLUT3. Bar=100 µm.
Fig. 6.
Morphological development and ultrastructure of trophoblastic septa in the
labyrinth zone. Decrease in cellular density in trophoblastic septa and increase
in size of cytotrophoblasts with pregnancy progression; HE stain. Bar=100 µm.
Lower right, ultrastructure of trophoblastic septa. Bar=15 µm. AV, allantoic
vessel; Ct, cytotrophoblast; FV, fetal vessel; MS, maternal sinusoid; St,
syncytiotrophoblast; TL, trophectoderm layers.
Fig. 7.
Cellular proliferative activity of each placental layer during pregnancy. Error
bar represents SD.
Expression of GLUT1 and GLUT3 in trophoblastic septa. Left, schema of
trophoblastic septa. Pathway of glucose via GLUT1 and GLUT3. Upper right,
immunohistochemical expression of GLUT1. Bar=100 µm. Lower right,
immunohistochemical expression of GLUT3. Bar=100 µm.Morphological development and ultrastructure of trophoblastic septa in the
labyrinth zone. Decrease in cellular density in trophoblastic septa and increase
in size of cytotrophoblasts with pregnancy progression; HE stain. Bar=100 µm.
Lower right, ultrastructure of trophoblastic septa. Bar=15 µm. AV, allantoic
vessel; Ct, cytotrophoblast; FV, fetal vessel; MS, maternal sinusoid; St,
syncytiotrophoblast; TL, trophectoderm layers.Cellular proliferative activity of each placental layer during pregnancy. Error
bar represents SD.
• Physiological function and toxicological features
Syncytiotrophoblasts form a layer that separates the fetal circulation from the
maternal circulation. These cells express several efflux and influx transporters that
serve to control transfer of chemicals between the fetus and dam. In order to regulate
the transfer process of chemicals, the plasma membranes are equipped with various
transporters between the maternal and fetal side: multidrug resistance protein
(Mdr)1a, Mdr1b, multidrug resistance-associated protein (Mrp)1, Mrp5, organic cation
transporter (Oct)3, organic cation transporter novel (Octn)1, organic
anion-transporting polypeptide (Oatp)3, Oatp12, four metal transporters (ZnT1,
divalent metal transporter 1, Menkes, and Wilson), a prostaglandin, ATP-binding
cassette sub-family G member (AbcG)8, equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT)1, and
ENT2[12]. In addition, glucose is
the main fuel for growth and energy metabolism of fetoplacental tissues, and the
transplacental movement of glucose is a stereospecific saturable and carrier-mediated
process of facilitated diffusion[15].
The expression of two maternal-to-fetal glucose transporter isoforms has been
demonstrated in rats, namely GLUT1 and GLUT3 on the trophoblastic septa[16], [17]. GLUT 1 is localized in the membrane of
syncytiotrophoblast layer I facing the maternal blood side and is present in the
membrane of syncytiotrophoblast II facing the fetal capillaries (Fig. 5). In contrast, GLUT3 is localized in the membrane of
syncytiotrophoblast layer I facing the maternal blood side and is present in between
syncytiotrophoblast layers I and II. The asymmetric distribution of GLUT3 across the
placental barrier may suggest asymmetric transfer of glucose, which would be
beneficial to provision of a stable milieu for fetal development while also preventing
the loss of glucose at times of maternal hypoglycemia. The glucose transport capacity
develops primarily due to an increase in the total number of glucose transporters
found on the membranes of the trophoblasts. In addition, the expression of glucose
transporters has been found to be increased as an adaptive change in small
placentas[18]. Cytotrophoblasts
and fetal endocapillary cells are nonfunctional for a placental barrier, since they
are fenestrated. The cytotrophoblasts function by slowing the maternal blood flow and
forming local regions of blood stasis behind the fenestrations that facilitate
fetomaternal transport[19].The labyrinth zone plays a role in O2/CO2 exchange, providing
nutrients for the fetus and removing waste products. Labyrinth zone damage has a high
correlation with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR)[14]. The labyrinth zone is vulnerable to the target site in
placental toxicity because of high blood flow, high cellular proliferative activity,
and long proliferation period as compared with other parts of the placenta. It has
been reported that antiproliferative or apoptotic agents result in a small placenta
and IUGR due to labyrinth zone hypoplasia[20], [21], [22]
(Table 1). Conversely, estrogen is an
inhibitor of placental growth, and estrogen deficiency induces placental
hypertrophy[23],
[24]. The labyrinth zone is
a hormone-dependent tissue, and aromatase inhibitors induce labyrinth zone
hypertrophy, which is associated with an increase in mitosis of trophoblasts and the
cystic dilatation of maternal sinuses due to the antiestrogenic effect[25], [26].
(2) Basal zone
The basal zone forms just below the labyrinth zone and is composed of
spongiotrophoblasts, glycogen cells, and (secondary) trophoblastic giant cells[27]. Developmentally, there are two types of
trophoblastic giant cells. The primary trophoblastic giant cells derived from the mural
trophectoderm are present outside Reichert’s membrane[28] (Fig. 3). These
cells are of paramount importance for successful implantation but are not components of
the basal zone. The secondary trophoblastic giant cells (hereinafter referred to as
trophoblastic giant cells) are formed from the edge of the trophoblastic ectoplacental
cone[29]. These cells are large
polyploid cells with a characteristically enormous, deeply divided nucleus. They provide
the first surface layer for the ectoplacental cone on GD 10 and are located between the
spongiotrophoblast layer and decidua basalis. The spongiotrophoblasts are derived from
the outer layers of the ectoplacental cone on GD 10 and are located immediately above
the trophoblastic giant cell layer. They are a main structural component of the basal
zone. The glycogen cells, which accumulate glycogen-rich granules, transiently appear on
GD 12 and form small clusters on GD 14. They develop into glycogen cell islands and
comprise a large part of the basal zone on GD 15 and 16. They exhibit pyknosis after GD
17 with basal zone regression, and then almost all glycogen cells disappear on GD 21
(Fig. 8). The glycogen cells are reportedly derived from the spongiotrophoblasts.
However, the same evidence suggests that glycogen cells are distinct from
spongiotrophoblasts[30]. The
cellular proliferative activity in the basal zone is at its peak on GD 13 and then
nearly disappears until GD 15 (Fig. 7). In
response to this, the basal zone fully develops on GD 15, and this gradually leads to
regression before parturition (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8.
Morphology of the basal zone and decidua basalis from GD 13 to GD 21. Regression
of the decidua basalis from GD 13. Full development of the basal zone with
glycogen islet formation on GD 15 and then gradual regression. Penetration of
interstitial trophoblasts through the decidua basalis into the metrial gland from
GD 15. HE stain. Bar=500 µm. BZ, basal zone; DB, decidua basalis; GC, glycogen
cell; IT, interstitial trophoblast; LZ, labyrinth zone; MG, metrial gland; St,
spongiotrophoblast; TG, trophoblastic giant cell.
Morphology of the basal zone and decidua basalis from GD 13 to GD 21. Regression
of the decidua basalis from GD 13. Full development of the basal zone with
glycogen islet formation on GD 15 and then gradual regression. Penetration of
interstitial trophoblasts through the decidua basalis into the metrial gland from
GD 15. HE stain. Bar=500 µm. BZ, basal zone; DB, decidua basalis; GC, glycogen
cell; IT, interstitial trophoblast; LZ, labyrinth zone; MG, metrial gland; St,
spongiotrophoblast; TG, trophoblastic giant cell.The basal zone is a site of production of steroids and peptide hormones, which play
an important role in the maintenance of pregnancy[31]. The peak placental progesterone production is on GD 11, and
testosterone production reaches its maximum level on GD 17[32]. Synthesis of progesterone and testosterone falls
precipitously from GD 17 onward, and this change reflects the reduced functional
importance of the basal zone in association with the higher level of apoptosis in late
pregnancy[33]. In ovariectomized
rats treated with estrogen and progesterone, overgrowth of the basal zone is induced
by a response to the hormonal imbalance[34]. The trophoblastic giant cells, spongiotrophoblasts, and invasive
trophoblasts are capable of expressing components of the prolactin family[35], [36]. The spongiotrophoblasts, in particular, are a major
source of them.The basal zone plays an important functional role in metabolism of
chemicals[37]. CYP3A1, a major
component of the CYP system during pregnancy, is mainly located in trophoblastic giant
cells. The expression of CYP3A1 is induced by diallyl disulfide[38], pregnenolone
16-alpha-carbonitrile[39], and
phenobarbital[40]. In addition,
CYP17 (17-alpha-hydroxylase/C17,20-lyase) is detected during the second half of
pregnancy[41], and is located in
the spongiotrophoblasts and trophoblastic giant cells in the basal zone and in
trophoblasts in the labyrinth zone.The glycogen cells are the storage site for glycogen that is produced from maternal
glucose[42]. This glycogen is
suggested to be an important nutrient for the fetus. It is known that glycogen cells
are increased in the basal zone with the expression of hypoxia in rats given a
low-sodium diet[43]. The disappearance
of glycogen cell islands is thought to meet the increased demand for glycogen as an
energy substrate for the final period of fetal growth[44], [45]. Cystic degeneration describes abnormal retention of extensive
cytoplasmic vacuolation within glycogen cells. It is induced by remaining glycogen
cell islands that should regress and disappear at the end of pregnancy, as a result of
placental developmental delay.The trophoblastic giant cells have phagocytic activity, which mediates the
implantation and invasion of the conceptus into the endometrial stroma[28]. This expression tends to decrease with
advancing pregnancy, and the phagocytosis in the final stages of pregnancy reportedly
is quite reduced[46]. The
trophoblastic giant cells also secrete several factors that control placental growth
and maternal reactions to pregnancy. In addition, they are immunologically
specialized, and express none of the major histocompatibility complex determinants on
their plasma membranes. It is thought that the trophoblastic giant cells play the role
of an immunologically neutral buffer zone at the interface between fetal and maternal
tissues. As described above, the basal zone consists of 3 different kinds of tissues
that develop different functions and regress at different times. Thus, chemically
induced lesions in the basal zone largely tend to differ depending on the chemical
administration period as compared with other parts of the placenta.
(3) Yolk sac
• Morphological structure
The yolk sac is an extraembryonic membrane surrounding the embryo and is composed of
epithelial and mesodermal cells. Developmentally, the yolk sac is derived from
embryonic endoderm and mesoderm. It becomes enlarged and surrounds the entire embryo.
It is divided into the visceral yolk sac surrounding the embryo with the amnion and
the parietal yolk sac attached to the rim of the chorionic plate (Fig. 3, 9). The parietal yolk sac is lined with Reichert’s
membrane between the endoderm and trophoblasts[47]. Reichert’s membrane is a rodent-specific and acellular thin
membrane.In early development, the blood islands are formed on the surface of the visceral
yolk sac and are the first site of embryonic hematopoiesis[48]. They subsequently develop into the yolk sac circulation
on GD 10. The inside of the visceral yolk sac becomes exposed to the intrauterine
cavity and becomes an inverted yolk sac placenta when the parietal yolk sac ruptures
on GD 16[49] (Fig. 9). The cellular proliferative activity of the yolk sac is at its peak on GD 15
and then gradually decreases until GD 21 (Fig.
7).
Fig. 9.
Morphology of the parietal and visceral yolk sac in rats and morphological
differences in the yolk sac between rats and humans. a. Parietal yolk sac on GD
9.5 in rats. HE stain. Bar = 50 µm. b. Visceral yolk sac on GD 9.5 in rats. HE
stain. Bar = 50 μm. c. Metallothionein expression in the visceral yolk sac on GD
17 in rats. Bar = 50 µm. Lower schema. Morphological differences of yolk sac
between humans and rats (early stage and middle/late stage).
Morphology of the parietal and visceral yolk sac in rats and morphological
differences in the yolk sac between rats and humans. a. Parietal yolk sac on GD
9.5 in rats. HE stain. Bar = 50 µm. b. Visceral yolk sac on GD 9.5 in rats. HE
stain. Bar = 50 μm. c. Metallothionein expression in the visceral yolk sac on GD
17 in rats. Bar = 50 µm. Lower schema. Morphological differences of yolk sac
between humans and rats (early stage and middle/late stage).During an early stage, the visceral and parietal yolk sacs play a role as a transient
placenta that performs endocytosis of nutrient materials[50]. This yolk sac placenta is also involved with endocrine,
metabolic, immunologic, secretory, excretory, and hematopoietic functions[51]. It is the only route for major
transport between dam and embryo until establishment of the chorioallantoic placenta
on GD 11.5[49]. Furthermore, the
visceral yolk sac even maintains placental functions, as the inverted yolk sac
placenta, until just before parturition[5]. The inverted yolk sac placenta is a specific biological structure
in rodents and rabbits. Thus, impaired structural and functional development of the
yolk sac contributes to embryo/fetal toxicity and teratogenicity in rats[52], [53]. In addition, the presence of metallothionein in the
yolk sac protects the fetus from heavy metals. Expression of metallothionein is
detected in epithelial cytoplasm from GD 9. It gradually increases until GD 19 and
then slightly decreases on GD 21[54]
(Fig. 9).
2) Maternal part of the placenta
(1) Decidua
The decidua is derived from the endometrial stroma and is divided into the decidua
capsularis (anti-mesometrial side), decidua parietalis (lateral side), and decidua
basalis (mesometrial side) (Fig. 10). Developmentally, the decidual cells surrounding the blastocyst initially form
the primary decidual zone. Subsequently, the more loosely packed decidual cells around
the primary decidual zone form the secondary decidual zone[55] (Fig. 3). The
primary decidual zone degenerates progressively, and placental and embryonic growth
slowly replaces the secondary decidual zone, which develops into a thin layer
comprised of the decidua capsularis and decidua parietalis. The decidua capsularis
consistently regresses from GD 8 onward and completely ruptures by GD 17-18. Rupture
of the decidua capsularis exposes the inverted yolk sac placenta to the reformed
uterine epithelium, which is completely restored by GD 15[56]. The decidua basalis is located at the base of the
placenta and is an important site for maternal angiogenesis. Most of the development
of the decidua basalis occurs during early pregnancy, and the decidua basalis
undergoes regression from GD 11 onward. Therefore, the sensitivity of the decidua to
chemicals in the organogenesis period is generally lower than that of other parts of
the placenta. It is known that the regression of the decidua is mediated by
apoptosis[57]. As hemorrhage and
edema are sometimes observed in the regression process of the decidua, it is necessary
to distinguish them from toxicological lesions. Histologically, the decidual cells are
of 2 types: large cells with a large round nucleus and smaller cells with a small
nucleus and periodic acid-Schiff-positive vacuolated cytoplasm. The large cells
disappear on GD 14, but the small cells remain until the end of pregnancy[58].
Fig. 10.
Transverse sections of the decidua and metrial gland on GD 9.5. Division of
the decidua into the decidua capsularis, decidua parietalis, and decidua
basalis. The metrial gland in the mesometrial triangle with borders on two
smooth muscle layers (arrows). HE stain.
Transverse sections of the decidua and metrial gland on GD 9.5. Division of
the decidua into the decidua capsularis, decidua parietalis, and decidua
basalis. The metrial gland in the mesometrial triangle with borders on two
smooth muscle layers (arrows). HE stain.The decidua has a variety of functions: it acts as a physical barrier to isolate the
implanting blastocyst from maternal tissue, as a nutrient source as a result of
accumulation of glycogen and/or lipid, and as a producer of hormones, such as
prolactin, prostaglandin, steroid, relaxin, etc.[47]. The decidua is a hormone-dependent tissue. Estradiol plays an
important role in the growth and differentiation of endometrial stromal cells into
decidual cells. In addition, progesterone and prolactin are considered essential for
decidual development. Excess estrogen administration in pseudopregnant rats has an
inhibitory effect on decidual growth[59]. A reduction in serum progesterone levels also suppresses the
decidual cell response in pseudopregnant rats[60]. Estrogen receptors (ER)α and ERβ are expressed in the decidua
and are differentially regulated by prolactin and steroids[61].The decidua is an important tissue in protection against heavy metals.
Metallothionein is present in the decidua from GD 9 onward, increases until GD 15 in
tissue surrounding the embryo/fetus[53], and then decreases with progression of placental development.
(2) Metrial gland
The metrial gland occupies a space in the mesometrial triangle and borders on two
smooth muscle layers in the early gestation period. These muscle layers are disrupted
as the metrial gland develops[62]
(Fig. 10, 11). The metrial gland is
composed of uterine natural killer (uNK) cells, decidualized endometrial stromal
cells, invasive trophoblasts, blood vessels (including spiral arteries), and
fibroblasts[63]. Developmentally,
the cellular proliferative activity in the metrial gland is at its peak on GD 11 or 12
and then gradually decreases toward late gestation (Fig. 7). In response, the metrial gland fully develops on GD 13 and
comprises the majority of the maternal part of the placenta until
parturition[8],
[64] (Fig. 1).Two types of trophoblasts from the basal zone are present in the metrial
gland[65] (Fig. 11). Interstitial trophoblasts penetrate through the decidua basalis and
myometrium on GD 15 and are often situated in perivascular locations of the metrial
gland[11], [44]. They are one of the main cell types
constituting the metrial gland after invasion. Endovascular trophoblasts invade into
the spiral arteries, where they replace endothelial cells from GD 13 or 14
onward[66].
Fig. 11.
Morphology of the metrial gland. a. Invasion of interstitial trophoblasts
(arrow) into the metrial gland on GD 15. HE stain. Bar=900 µm. b. Invasion of
endovascular trophoblasts into spiral arteries and localization of interstitial
trophoblasts around spiral arteries in stroma. HE stain. Bar=100 µm. BZ, basal
zone; DB, decidua basalis; ET, endovascular trophoblast; IT, interstitial
trophoblasts; LZ, labyrinth zone; MG, metrial gland; SA, spiral artery; NK, uNK
cell.
Morphology of the metrial gland. a. Invasion of interstitial trophoblasts
(arrow) into the metrial gland on GD 15. HE stain. Bar=900 µm. b. Invasion of
endovascular trophoblasts into spiral arteries and localization of interstitial
trophoblasts around spiral arteries in stroma. HE stain. Bar=100 µm. BZ, basal
zone; DB, decidua basalis; ET, endovascular trophoblast; IT, interstitial
trophoblasts; LZ, labyrinth zone; MG, metrial gland; SA, spiral artery; NK, uNK
cell.The metrial gland is a unique decidual tissue characterized by the appearance of uNK
cells and is rodent specific. Development of the metrial gland is inhibited in
connection with the reduced proliferative activity of uNK cells caused by
tamoxifen[67], estrogen[68], and ovariectomy[69]. In uNK gene knockout mice (TgE26 mice),
the mesometrial triangle area does not develop into the metrial gland, and the absence
of uNK cells results in a small placenta and poor reproductive performance[70]. The importance of progesterone in uNK
cell differentiation and proliferation has been shown in studies on the effects of
ovariectomy with replacement progesterone treatment[62], [71]. On the other hand, impaired basal zone development leads to
metrial gland hypoplasia[14],
[22], [72], since invasion of interstitial
trophoblasts derived from the basal zone is inhibited[73]. Thus, it is thought that the metrial gland is a
hormone-dependent tissue[74], and its
development is also affected by uNK cell proliferation and basal zone development.Uterine natural killer cells are the main component of the metrial gland and are also
known as granulated metrial gland (GMG) cells in rodents. Decidualized endometrial
stromal cells produce signals that trigger recruitment and guide uNK cell
differentiation to express a different phenotype from that of circulating NK
cells[75]. The uNK cells play
critical roles in maternal immune tolerance at the maternal-fetal interface by
facilitating the pairing of fetal leukocyte antigen and maternal killer inhibitory
receptors[76]. In addition, they
produce protease that destroys the spiral arterial basement membranes and produce
vascular endothelial growth factor that stimulates endothelial cell proliferation in
order to promote vascular remodeling and angiogenesis[77], [78]. Insufficient uNK cell activation contributes to poor spiral
arterial remodeling[79]. Failure of
spiral arterial remodeling increases maternal blood pressure[80] and reduces subsequent placental perfusion. Therefore,
alterations of uNK cell function and inadequate remodeling of spiral arteries in the
metrial gland are linked to pregnancy-associated diseases such as preeclampsia, IUGR,
and premature pregnancy termination[81], [82], [83].
Comparison with Human Placenta
The placental villi that show many tree-like projections in humans are functionally
analogous to the labyrinth zone in rats. The placentas of humans and rats are categorized
as the hemochorial type, as the trophoblasts of both are directly bathed in maternal
blood[84] (Fig. 12). The fetal-maternal interface in humans is comprised of a single
syncytiotrophoblast layer and single cytotrophoblast layer and is categorized as
hemomonochorial. In contrast, the interface in rats is comprised of three layers and is
therefore hemotrichorial (Table 2). This
difference between rats and humans might affect fetal-maternal exchange processes in the
placental barrier[85].
Fig. 12.
Human placenta. a. Macrograph of a placenta at term pregnancy. b. Placental villi.
HE stain. Bar=75 µm. c. Surface of the basal plate with extravillous cytotrophoblast
invasion and fibrinoid deposition. HE stain. Bar=150 µm. AV, anchoring villus; EC,
extravillous cytotrophoblast; Fi, fibrinoid; FV, fetal vessel; IVS, intervillous
space; St, syncytiotrophoblast.
Human placenta. a. Macrograph of a placenta at term pregnancy. b. Placental villi.
HE stain. Bar=75 µm. c. Surface of the basal plate with extravillous cytotrophoblast
invasion and fibrinoid deposition. HE stain. Bar=150 µm. AV, anchoring villus; EC,
extravillous cytotrophoblast; Fi, fibrinoid; FV, fetal vessel; IVS, intervillous
space; St, syncytiotrophoblast.The basal plate is the bottom of the intervillous space and represents part of the
maternal-fetal junction. It is composed of an admixture of extravillous trophoblasts,
various endometrial stromal cells, decidual cells, blood vessels (including spiral
arteries), and endometrial glands with fibrinoid overlying the myometrium[86] (Fig.
12). Multinucleated trophoblastic giant cells are present in the deep basal plate
at the myometrial border. The basal plate is roughly analogous to the basal zone in rats,
based on to its anatomical location[85],
but the morphology is not necessarily similar. Therefore, caution is required in
extrapolation of toxicological effects on the basal zone from the rat placenta to the
human placenta.The yolk sac in humans does not enlarge and remains as a stalk only. The yolk sac floats
like a balloon within the exocoelomic cavity and never becomes directly apposed to the
chorionic plate, maternal uterine wall, or uterine lumen[87] (Fig. 9). It is
thought that the human yolk sac does not function as a placenta in the sense of being able
to transfer nutrients between maternal and embryonal circulations[86], [88], [89]. Therefore, embryo toxicity induced by yolk sac dysfunction during the
period before chorioallantoic placenta formation in rats cannot necessarily be
extrapolated to humans. Toxicologically, this is one of the important species differences
between rat and human placentas[90].
Caution is therefore also required in extrapolation of embryo toxicity from rats to humans
during the period before chorioallantoic placenta formation[91]. In addition, there is no inverted yolk sac placenta in
humans. Thus, an animal model that does not rely upon an inverted yolk sac for embryonic
nutrition should be used to elucidate any potential risk of developmental toxicity caused
by chemicals in humans.[89]In humans, the decidua, which underlies the basal plate, is the site of implantation. The
spiral arteries that connect the maternal uterine arteries to the intervillous space
penetrate through the decidua. The decidua in humans is analogous to the decidua and
metrial gland in rats. There are three types of decidual cells in humans: small
predecidual swollen fibroblasts, large undifferentiated decidual cells, and large
differentiated decidual cells. These decidual cells are isolated from each other by an
investment of fibrinoid and are linked by fewer gap junctions than are found in
rats[47]. The decidua contains many
uNK cells, which are also known as large granular lymphocytes in humans. Many of these are
aggregated around the spiral arteries[92]
and play a role in the control of trophoblast invasion and vascular remodeling[93]. Therefore, the uNK cells in humans have
approximately the same function as those in rats[82]. In humans, preeclampsia is believed to result in part from
inadequate maternal blood flow to the implantation site associated with angiogenesis
inhibition and inadequate remodeling of spiral arteries[94], [95]. The histological feature of preeclampsia is restricted invasion of
spiral arteries into the placental bed, with endovascular trophoblast invasion limited to
the decidual vessels[96]. Tamoxifen
induces the angiogenesis inhibition and inadequate remodeling of spiral arteries in the
metrial glands in rats[67].
3) Steroid hormone biosynthesis
There are species differences in the steroid hormone biosynthetic pathway in the placenta
that result from differences in enzyme expression associated with this pathway (Fig. 13). In humans, the synthesis of pregnenolone and progesterone from cholesterol is
carried out in the placenta. However, pregnenolone is converted to dehydroepiandrosterone
in the adrenal gland of fetuses, as CYP17 is absent from the human placenta[97]. Dehydroepiandrosterone is transported into
the placenta and is then converted to estrogen[98]. In contrast, pregnenolone synthesized from cholesterol is converted
to androgen in the rat, as CYP17 is present in the rat placenta[99]. However, as aromatase is not present in the rat placenta,
estrogen is not synthesized in the placentas but is instead synthesized in ovary. The
androgen in the rat placentas might contribute to estrogen synthesis in the ovaries.
Therefore, caution is also required in extrapolation of toxicological effects on the
steroidogenic pathway from rat to human placentas.
Fig. 13.
Pathway of steroid hormone biosynthesis in rats and humans.
Pathway of steroid hormone biosynthesis in rats and humans.
Toxicological Significance of Placental Weight Change
Placental weight shows a high correlation with placental transport and metabolic mechanisms
that qualitatively and quantitatively affect placental-fetal nutrient exchange[100]. In humans, a strong relationship has been
reported between fetal and placental weight[101]. In rats, this relationship at GD 21 is the basis of our previous
placental toxicity studies using Wistar Hannover rats, as shown in Fig. 14. The correlation is present except when there is a significant increase in placental
weight. Conversely, placental weight is strongly affected by placental histopathological
lesions (Fig. 15). In particular, placental weight reflects changes in the labyrinth zone in middle
and late gestation, since the labyrinth zone becomes a major part of the placenta with
advancing pregnancy. An increase in placental weight is induced by the adaptive response to
a circulatory disturbance in the labyrinth zone[102], hypertrophy of the labyrinth zone[26] and basal zone[24], or
a reduction in the number of fetuses to less than 6[103]. A decrease in placental weight is mainly induced by hypoplasia of the
labyrinth zone, resulting from apoptosis and/or necrosis of trophoblasts, and usually leads
to IUGR. However, despite the fact that placental weight was reduced to about 70% of that of
the control group in a previous study, it was found that a compensatory response by the
placenta might prevent IUGR from being induced[18]. Moreover, it is difficult to detect hypoplasia of the metrial gland from
placental weight changes despite induction of IUGR, because the placentas are separated at
the basal zone and decidua basalis and are removed from the uterine wall for placental
weight measurement. Therefore, although histopathological examination of the placenta is not
generally performed in reproductive and developmental toxicity studies, not only placental
weight but also placental histopathology should be considered in order to accurately
evaluate the secondary effects of placental damage on embryo/fetal toxicity.
Fig. 14.
Relationship between fetal and placental weight. Normal range of weight, mean ± 3
SD.
Relationship between fetal and placental weight. Normal range of weight, mean ± 3
SD.Pathogenesis of placental weight changes. BZ, basal zone; LZ, labyrinth zone; MG,
metrial gland.
Conclusion
The placenta plays a pivotal role in fetal growth, and placental dysfunction and injury are
associated with embryo/fetal toxicity. Although the placental weight change is one of the
most important indexes of placental toxicity in reproductive and developmental toxicity
studies, the placental weight assessment alone is not always enough to evaluate placental
toxicity. In order to accurately evaluate reproductive and developmental toxicity studies,
it is important to identify the histopathological changes in each part of the placenta and
to elucidate the mechanism of placental toxicity through molecular investigation (Fig. 16). The placenta is toxicologically susceptible to various chemicals because of its
high blood flow, rapid growth, and sex-hormone dependence. The placenta has these complex
toxicological features, which are unlike those of other organs, and placental toxicity
depends on the timing of pregnancy. Thus, the time-dependent histopathological examination
of the rat placenta should be based on understanding of normal developmental changes in
morphology and function. In addition, extrapolation of placental toxicity from rats to
humans should be done cautiously in evaluation of risk factors because of species
differences.
Fig. 16.
Significance of placental histopathology in reproductive and developmental toxicity
studies.
Significance of placental histopathology in reproductive and developmental toxicity
studies.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Authors: J C Cross; M Hemberger; Y Lu; T Nozaki; K Whiteley; M Masutani; S L Adamson Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2002-02-22 Impact factor: 4.102
Authors: C Tessier; S Deb; A Prigent-Tessier; S Ferguson-Gottschall; G B Gibori; R P Shiu; G Gibori Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Matthew T Ruis; Kylie D Rock; Samantha M Hall; Brian Horman; Heather B Patisaul; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Jacob Gibbens; Shauna-Kay Spencer; Lucia Solis; Teylor Bowles; Patrick B Kyle; Jamie L Szczepanski; John Polk Dumas; Reanna Robinson; Kedra Wallace Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Jeanne A Ishimwe; Melanie B Baker; Michael R Garrett; Jennifer M Sasser Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Anthony L Su; Sean M Harris; Elana R Elkin; Alla Karnovsky; Justin A Colacino; Rita Loch-Caruso Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: Genoa R Warner; Raquel S Dettogni; Indrani C Bagchi; Jodi A Flaws; Jones B Graceli Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.421