Literature DB >> 30739349

Conversion from Vancomycin Trough Concentration-Guided Dosing to Area Under the Curve-Guided Dosing Using Two Sample Measurements in Adults: Implementation at an Academic Medical Center.

Lina Meng1, Tiffany Wong1, Sharon Huang1, Emily Mui1, Vinhkhoa Nguyen2, Gabriela Espinosa3, Janjri Desai1, Marisa Holubar4, Stan Deresinski4.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The optimal pharmacodynamic parameter for the prediction of efficacy of vancomycin is the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and current published data indicate that dosing based on vancomycin trough concentrations is an inaccurate substitute. In this study, our objective was to compare the achievement of therapeutic target attainment after switching from a trough-based to an AUC-based dosing strategy as a part of our institution's vancomycin-per-pharmacy protocol.
DESIGN: Prospective observational quality assurance study.
SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 296 hospitalized adults who received vancomycin and monitoring under our institution's vancomycin-per-pharmacy protocol were included in the analysis. The preimplementation retrospective comparison group consisted of 179 patients in whom vancomycin was initiated using a trough-based dosing strategy between November 22, 2017, and January 22, 2018. The postimplementation group included 117 patients in whom vancomycin was initiated using an AUC-based dosing strategy using two-point sampling between June 19, 2018, and July 19, 2018, after hospital-wide implementation of this protocol on June 19, 2018.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: AUC values were calculated from two vancomycin concentrations (peak and trough). The primary outcome was achievement of therapeutic AUC values (400-800 mg·hr/L) in the postimplementation group or therapeutic trough level values (10-20 mg/L) in the preimplementation group. Only 98 (55%) of 179 initial trough values were therapeutic in the preimplementation group (trough-only dosing method) versus 86 (73.5%) of 117 initial AUC values in the postimplementation group (AUC-based dosing method) (p=0.0014). A lower proportion of supratherapeutic AUC values was observed in the postimplementation group compared with supratherapeutic trough concentrations in the preimplementation group (1.7% vs 18%, p<0.0001). Overall, 62% of patients with initially therapeutic AUC values had subsequent trough value increases of 25% or greater, occurring at a median of 6 days of vancomycin therapy. Nephrotoxicity occurred in 11% of patients in the preimplementation versus 9.4% in the postimplementation group (p=0.70).
CONCLUSION: Compared with a trough concentration-based dosing strategy, AUC-based dosing using two-point sampling improved therapeutic target attainment. Implementation is feasible at any hospital that performs vancomycin peak concentration testing and is a workable alternative to using Bayesian software for estimating AUC. This approach should also be directly compared with AUC-based dosing using Bayesian software.
© 2019 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antimicrobial stewardship; clinical pharmacy services; dosing strategies; therapeutic drug monitoring; vancomycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30739349     DOI: 10.1002/phar.2234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  19 in total

1.  Should Therapeutic Monitoring of Vancomycin Based on Area under the Curve Become Standard Practice for Patients with Confirmed or Suspected Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-06-01

2.  Performance of Area under the Concentration-Time Curve Estimations of Vancomycin with Limited Sampling by a Newly Developed Web Application.

Authors:  Kazutaka Oda; Yumi Hashiguchi; Toshimi Kimura; Yasuhiro Tsuji; Kensuke Shoji; Yoshiko Takahashi; Kazuaki Matsumoto; Hideki Kawamura; Hideyuki Saito; Yoshio Takesue
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  A Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Loaded with Gentamicin and Vancomycin Successfully Eradicates Chronic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Orthopedic Infection in a Sheep Model.

Authors:  Willemijn Boot; Tanja Schmid; Matteo D'Este; Olivier Guillaume; Andrew Foster; Laurent Decosterd; Robert G Richards; David Eglin; Stephan Zeiter; Thomas F Moriarty
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Point-Counterpoint: Should Clinical Microbiology Laboratories Report Vancomycin MICs?

Authors:  Sara L Revolinski; Christopher D Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Risk Factors Associated With Nephrotoxicity During Outpatient Intravenous Vancomycin Administration.

Authors:  Karen M Krueger; Lisa LaCloche; Amy Buros Stein; Ryan Kates; Milena Murray; Michael P Angarone
Journal:  J Pharm Technol       Date:  2021-11-18

6.  Gap Analysis for the Conversion to Area Under the Curve Vancomycin Monitoring in a Small Rural Hospital.

Authors:  Jennifer L Cole
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2020-06

7.  Clinical Application Value of Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Vancomycin in Children Treated in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Bo Zhou; Wenyi Xiong; Ke Bai; Hongxing Dang; Jing Li; Feng Xu; Yue-Qiang Fu; Chengjun Liu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 8.  TDM is dead. Long live TCI!

Authors:  Nick Holford; Guangda Ma; David Metz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.716

9.  Assessment of Vancomycin Pharmacokinetics and Dose Regimen Optimisation in Preterm Neonates.

Authors:  Mwila Mulubwa; Heletje Aletta Griesel; Pierre Mugabo; Ricky Dippenaar; Lizelle van Wyk
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2020-06

10.  Impact of Recent Methamphetamine Use on Vancomycin Clearance.

Authors:  S Andrea Laguado; Nina Vadiei; Kateryna Yenina
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2020-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.