| Literature DB >> 30738741 |
Andrea Hauser1, Matthias An der Heiden2, Karolin Meixenberger3, Orjin Han4, Stefan Fiedler3, Kirsten Hanke3, Uwe Koppe2, Alexandra Hofmann5, Viviane Bremer2, Barbara Bartmeyer2, Claudia Kuecherer3, Norbert Bannert6.
Abstract
Serological methods to differentiate between recently acquired and established HIV-1 infections are a useful tool in the HIV-surveillance to characterize the epidemic, identify groups at risk and assess HIV-preventive interventions. Therefore, an avidity-based, modified BioRad Genscreen™ HIV-1/2 assay (BRAEUR) was evaluated according to the avidity-based, modified BioRad HIV-1/2 Plus O protocol (BRAUSA). Overall, 692 well defined samples (82.5% B and 17.5% non-B subtypes) from recent (<180 days, n = 239), intermediate (181-364 days, n = 35) or long term infections (≥365 days, n = 419) were used to determine a 'mean duration of recent infection' (MDRI), a 'median DRI' (MdDRI), the false recent rate (FRR), and concordance between the BRAs and the Sedia BED HIV-1 Capture enzyme immunoassay (BED). The optimal avidity index cut-off was determined to be 70% resulting in an MDRI of 233 days (95% IQR: 174-351) and an MdDRI of 171 days (95% IQR: 142-212). Concordance with the BRAUSA was high with 96.4%. The FRR of 6.0% as well as the MdDRI are similar to the BED (8.4%; 170 (139-214) days). Therefore, the BRAEUR is a suitable alternative to replace the BED and trend analysis will be feasible after minimal adjustments for the MdDRI and the MDRI.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30738741 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.02.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Virol Methods ISSN: 0166-0934 Impact factor: 2.014