Literature DB >> 30738603

The Quality of Symptoms in Women and Men Presenting to the Emergency Department With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Sahereh Mirzaei, Alana Steffen, Karen Vuckovic, Catherine Ryan, Ulf Bronas, Jessica Zegre-Hemsey, Holli A DeVon.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: More than 5.5 million patients present to emergency departments in the United States annually for potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS); however, diagnosing ACS remains a challenge in emergency departments. Our aim was to describe the quality of symptoms (chest discomfort/description of pain, location/radiation, and overall symptom distress) reported by women and men ruled-in and ruled-out for ACS in emergency departments.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 1,064 patients presenting to emergency departments with symptoms that triggered cardiac workups. Trained research staff obtained data using the ACS Patient Information Questionnaire upon patient presentation to emergency departments.
RESULTS: The sample (n = 1,064) included 474 (44.55%) patients ruled-in and 590 (55.45%) patients ruled-out for ACS. Symptom distress was significantly higher in patients ruled-in versus ruled-out for ACS (7.3 ± 2.6 vs. 6.8 ± 2.5; P = 0.002) and was a significant predictor for an ACS diagnosis in men (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.17; P = 0.003). Women also reported more chest pressure (51.75% vs. 44.65; P = 0.02) compared with men, and chest pressure was a significant predictor for a diagnosis of ACS (OR, 1.61; CI, 1.03-2.53; P = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Higher levels of symptom distress may help ED personnel in making a decision to evaluate a patient for ACS, and the presence of chest pressure may aid in making a differential diagnosis of ACS.
Copyright © 2019 Emergency Nurses Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute coronary syndrome; Sex differences; Symptom distress; Symptom quality

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30738603      PMCID: PMC6614000          DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2019.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Nurs        ISSN: 0099-1767            Impact factor:   1.836


  34 in total

1.  Standardized reporting guidelines for studies evaluating risk stratification of ED patients with potential acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Judd E Hollander; Andra L Blomkalns; Gerard X Brogan; Deborah B Diercks; John M Field; J Lee Garvey; W Brian Gibler; Timothy D Henry; James W Hoekstra; Brian R Holroyd; Yuling Hong; J Douglas Kirk; Brian J O'Neil; Raymond E Jackson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Symptoms and type of symptom onset in acute coronary syndrome in relation to ST elevation, sex, age, and a history of diabetes.

Authors:  Marie Thuresson; Marianne Berglin Jarlöv; Bertil Lindahl; Leif Svensson; Crister Zedigh; Johan Herlitz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.

Authors:  Wayne Rosamond; Katherine Flegal; Gary Friday; Karen Furie; Alan Go; Kurt Greenlund; Nancy Haase; Michael Ho; Virginia Howard; Brett Kissela; Bret Kissela; Steven Kittner; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Mary McDermott; James Meigs; Claudia Moy; Graham Nichol; Christopher J O'Donnell; Veronique Roger; John Rumsfeld; Paul Sorlie; Julia Steinberger; Thomas Thom; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Yuling Hong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Usefulness of chest pain character and location as diagnostic indicators of an acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Guy D Eslick
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Binding of the active metabolite of chloral hydrate, 2,2,2-trichloroethanol, to serum albumin demonstrated using tryptophan fluorescence quenching.

Authors:  Ken Solt; Jonas S Johansson
Journal:  Pharmacology       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.547

Review 6.  Age and sex differences in duration of prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hoa L Nguyen; Jane S Saczynski; Joel M Gore; Robert J Goldberg
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-11-24

7.  Psychometric evaluation of the Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Response Index.

Authors:  Barbara Riegel; Sharon McKinley; Debra K Moser; Hendrika Meischke; Lynn Doering; Kathleen Dracup
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 8.  Systematic review and modelling of the investigation of acute and chronic chest pain presenting in primary care.

Authors:  J Mant; R J McManus; R A L Oakes; B C Delaney; P M Barton; J J Deeks; L Hammersley; R C Davies; M K Davies; F D R Hobbs
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Reducing delay in seeking treatment by patients with acute coronary syndrome and stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Stroke Council.

Authors:  Debra K Moser; Laura P Kimble; Mark J Alberts; Angelo Alonzo; Janet B Croft; Kathleen Dracup; Kelly R Evenson; Alan S Go; Mary M Hand; Rashmi U Kothari; George A Mensah; Dexter L Morris; Arthur M Pancioli; Barbara Riegel; Julie Johnson Zerwic
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  Comparison of factors associated with atypical symptoms in younger and older patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Seon Young Hwang; Eun Hee Park; Eun Sook Shin; Myung Ho Jeong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  1 in total

1.  Characteristic differences of chest pain in male and female patients with acute coronary syndrome: A pilot study.

Authors:  Yurike Olivia Sella; Halidah Manistamara; Sony Apriliawan; Mifetika Lukitasari; Mohammad Saifur Rohman
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2021-04-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.