Sadeq Al-Murshedi1, Peter Hogg2, Andrew England2. 1. School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, United Kingdom. Electronic address: s.h.m.al-murshedi@edu.salford.ac.uk. 2. School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of being overweight on image quality (IQ), radiation dose and acquisition parameters when undertaking adult chest X-ray (CXR) examinations using routine acquisition protocols. METHODS: The Lungman chest phantom, with and without chest plates, was used to simulate the chest region for larger size and average adult patients, respectively. Radiographic acquisitions were conducted using 17 X-ray machines located in eight hospitals using their routine clinical protocols. IQ was assessed using relative visual grading analysis (VGA) and 2 alternative forced choice (2AFC) by six observers. Incident air kerma (IAK) was measured using a solid-state dosimeter. RESULTS: IQ mean (range) scores between the hospitals were 16.2 (12.0-21.3) with a 56.0% difference and 20.9 (14.1-23.6) with a 50.2% difference for the standard and larger size phantoms, respectively. IAK mean (range) scores 63 µGy (19-136 µGy) with a 150% difference and 159 µGy (27-384 µGy) with a 173% difference for the standard and larger size phantoms, respectively. The chest plates had a significant negative impact on IQ (P = 0.001) and lead to an increased in IAK by approximately 50%. CONCLUSION: Visual measures of IQ and IAK showed large differences between hospitals for standard and larger phantom sizes; differences within the hospitals was lower. Overall, Lungman with chest plates was found to degrade IQ and increase radiation dose by a factor of two. Further optimisation is required especially for the larger sized patient's imaging protocols for all eight hospitals.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of being overweight on image quality (IQ), radiation dose and acquisition parameters when undertaking adult chest X-ray (CXR) examinations using routine acquisition protocols. METHODS: The Lungman chest phantom, with and without chest plates, was used to simulate the chest region for larger size and average adult patients, respectively. Radiographic acquisitions were conducted using 17 X-ray machines located in eight hospitals using their routine clinical protocols. IQ was assessed using relative visual grading analysis (VGA) and 2 alternative forced choice (2AFC) by six observers. Incident air kerma (IAK) was measured using a solid-state dosimeter. RESULTS: IQ mean (range) scores between the hospitals were 16.2 (12.0-21.3) with a 56.0% difference and 20.9 (14.1-23.6) with a 50.2% difference for the standard and larger size phantoms, respectively. IAK mean (range) scores 63 µGy (19-136 µGy) with a 150% difference and 159 µGy (27-384 µGy) with a 173% difference for the standard and larger size phantoms, respectively. The chest plates had a significant negative impact on IQ (P = 0.001) and lead to an increased in IAK by approximately 50%. CONCLUSION: Visual measures of IQ and IAK showed large differences between hospitals for standard and larger phantom sizes; differences within the hospitals was lower. Overall, Lungman with chest plates was found to degrade IQ and increase radiation dose by a factor of two. Further optimisation is required especially for the larger sized patient's imaging protocols for all eight hospitals.