| Literature DB >> 30738361 |
Ling'En Yang1, Zihan Zhao1, Guobin Hou2, Chang Zhang1, Jun Liu3, Lin Xu1, Wei Li4, Zhizhou Tan1, Changchun Tu5, Biao He5.
Abstract
Ticks are medically-important arthropods that maintain and transmit numerous emerging viruses. China suffers severely from tick-borne viral diseases such as tick-borne encephalitis and severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS), but the background of tick-borne viruses is very limited. Here we report the virome profiling of ticks and goat sera from SFTS-epidemic areas, and serological investigation of SFTS virus (SFTSV) and Nairobi sheep disease virus (NSDV). Results revealed divergent viruses in ticks and goat sera, including SFTSV and NSDV. Sequence and phylogenetic analyses showed that the SFTSV identified here was most closely related to human SFTSV in sampling and surrounding areas, and the NSDV to the previously identified NSDV from northeast China. Serological investigation of SFTSV infection in goats revealed intensive activity in those areas. Surprisingly, two different methods of NSDV serological investigation showed no sera positive for this virus.Entities:
Keywords: Genomes; NSDV; SFTSV; Seroprevalence; Virome
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30738361 PMCID: PMC7127444 DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2019.01.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virology ISSN: 0042-6822 Impact factor: 3.616
Fig. 1Sampling information in this study. The first location (Xinyang) of reported SFTS is identified by a filled circle; the prior detection sites of NSDV are shown as open diamonds. (B) Detailed locations (triangles) of sampling in this study with SFTSV- and NSDV-positive sites by RT-PCR highlighted by filled triangles. (C) Magnified landscape illustration (generated from QQ Map) of shadowed area in panel B. (D) Goats, showing heavy infestation by ticks. Site abbreviations are as in Table 1.
Sample information, nucleic acids and serological detection of SFTSV and NSDV * .
| RT-PCR | S.I. | N.E. | N.I. | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | Site | Ticks # | Pool # | SFTSV P | NSDV P | Sera # | 1:200 | 1:400 | 1:1600 | 1:6400 | 1:25,600 | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| SZ | HD | 1084 | 103 | 1( | 2( | 49 | 29( | 16(32.7) | 9(18.4) | 2( | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| XL | 1537 | 169 | 2( | 0 | 211 | 160( | 113( | 57( | 5(2.4) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| WD | 0 | – | – | – | 155 | 51(32.9) | 24(15.5) | 9(5.8) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| GH | 0 | – | – | – | 51 | 29( | 19( | 10(19.6) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| ID | 585 | 31 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 231 | 173( | 154( | 100( | 19( | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| S-total | 3206 | 303 | 3( | 2( | 697 | 442( | 326( | 185( | 26( | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| XY | XS | 1246 | 104 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 25 | 6(24.0) | 6(24.0) | 5(20.0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| IL | 0 | – | – | – | 38 | 8(21.1) | 8(21.1) | 5(13.2) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| JW | 0 | – | – | – | 14 | 3(21.4) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| WC | 0 | – | – | – | 67 | 13(19.4) | 3(4.5) | 1(1.5) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| LS | 143 | 9 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 136 | 24(17.7) | 22(16.2) | 10(7.4) | 3(2.2) | 1( | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| YD | 0 | – | – | – | 37 | 5(13.5) | 5(13.5) | 2(5.4) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| LT | 0 | – | – | – | 65 | 20(30.8) | 11(16.9) | 4(6.2) | 1(1.5) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| S-total | 1389 | 113 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 382 | 79(20.7) | 55(14.4) | 27(7.1) | 4(1.1) | 1( | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
| Total | 4595 | 416 | 3(0.7) | 2(0.5) | 1079 | 521(48.3) | 381(35.3) | 212(19.7) | 30(2.8) | 1(0.1) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
*Abbreviations: SZ, Suizhou; XY, Xiangyang; HD, Haodian; XL, Xiaolin; WD, Wandian; GH, Guanghua; ID, Yingdian; S-total, Sub-total; XS, Xinshi; IL, Xinglong; JW, Juwan; WC, Wangcheng; LS, Liushen; YD, Yangdang; LT, Lutou; Tick #, tick numbers; Pool #, tick pool numbers; SFTSV P, tick pools positive for SFTSV by RT-PCR tests with percentages in brackets; NSDV P, tick pools positive for NSDV by RT-PCR test with percentages in brackets; Sera #, numbers of goat sera; S.I., SFTSV positive numbers (percentages) of goat sera by IIFA test with 5 dilutions; N.E., NSDV positive numbers (percentage) of goat sera by ELISA at 1:200 dilution; N.I., NSDV positive numbers (percentages) of goat sera by IIFA at 1:200 dilution. Individual or sub-total percentages larger than total levels are highlighted in bold italics.
Fig. 2Numbers of reads annotated to viruses classified by viral genus, family and nucleic acid group.
Fig. 3Distribution and identities of contigs of goat mamstrovirus (A), hepacivirus (B), cardiovirus (C), and tick mononeavirus (D) against reference sequences, and their preliminary phylogenetic relationship (filled circles). Scale bars indicate substitutions per site.
Fig. 4Distribution and identities of contigs of goat papillomavirus (A), circovirus (B), bocaparvovirus (C) and dependoparvovirus (D) against reference sequences and their preliminary phylogenetic relationship (filled circles). Scale bars indicate substitutions per site.
Fig. 5Phylogenetic relationships of SFTSV (A: S segment; B: M segment; C: L segment) and NSDV (D: S segment; E: M segment; F: L segment). New viruses reported in the present study are identified in bold italics. Scale bars indicate substitutions per site.
Fig. 6Serological investigation of SFTSV. (A) Seroprevalence comparison between Suizhou and Xiangyang; * *(*), significant difference with p value < 0.05 or < 0.001; *(**), with p value < 0.01 or < 0.001; ***, and with p value < 0.001. (B) A serum sample from Xiaolin (sample code XL21) was applied at dilutions of 1:200–1:6400 for IIFA analyses. (C) Endpoint titers (left titer scale) and neutralizing titers (right index scale) of SFTSV-specific Abs in goat sera tested by IIFA and NA respectively. Site abbreviations are as in Table 1.
Fig. 7Serological investigation of NSDV. (A) ELISA OD492 reading profiling of 504 goat sera including 2 positive controls (noted by +); 8 sera with the OD492 readings are noted by asterisks. (B) Three (XL8, HD8 and HD21) of goat sera noted by asterisks in panel A were analyzed by IIFA with mouse anti-NP hyperimmune serum as a positive control. (C) Eight sera noted by asterisks in panel A were analyzed by WB using E. coli expressed (pET) and recombinant baculovirus system (pBac) expressed NPs as antigens. Lanes were taken from different gels with sample codes illustrated above; + , mouse anti-NP hyperimmune serum.