K-A Lee1, S-H Lee2, H-R Kim3. 1. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: 20110116@kuh.ac.kr. 2. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: shlee@kuh.ac.kr. 3. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: kimhaerim@kuh.ac.kr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US) for calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) at the level of menisci, hyaline cartilage (HC), tendons, and synovial fluid (SF) of the knee, and to examine inter- and intra-observer reliability. DESIGN: We consecutively included patients with knee effusion over a 2-year period (43 patients with CPPD and 131 controls). All patients underwent SF analysis, conventional radiography (CR), and US examination using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) definition of the US characteristics of CPPD. Two independent operators performed the US, and inter-observer agreement was calculated. Intra-observer agreement was examined with static images obtained for all enrolled patients. RESULTS: US revealed calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) deposits in menisci, HC, and tendon more frequently in patients with CPPD than in control patients. The presence of US CPP deposits in SF was not significantly different between the two groups. Combined US evaluation of the three components (menisci, HC, and tendon) showed the best diagnostic performance. The sensitivity and specificity for US evaluation of the three components were 74.4% and 77.1%, respectively, while for CR evaluation, the sensitivity and specificity were 44.2% and 96.9%, respectively. Inter- and intra-observer agreement were excellent for medial (κ = 0.930, 0.972) and lateral menisci (κ = 0.905, 0.942), HC (κ = 0.844, 0.957), and SF (κ = 0.817, 0.925). Tendon showed fair inter-observer (κ = 0.532) and good intra-observer reliability (κ = 0.788). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the OMERACT definition, US demonstrated better diagnostic capacity than CR to diagnose CPPD, with excellent reliability. Combined evaluation of menisci, HC, and tendon showed the best diagnostic accuracy.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US) for calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) at the level of menisci, hyaline cartilage (HC), tendons, and synovial fluid (SF) of the knee, and to examine inter- and intra-observer reliability. DESIGN: We consecutively included patients with knee effusion over a 2-year period (43 patients with CPPD and 131 controls). All patients underwent SF analysis, conventional radiography (CR), and US examination using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) definition of the US characteristics of CPPD. Two independent operators performed the US, and inter-observer agreement was calculated. Intra-observer agreement was examined with static images obtained for all enrolled patients. RESULTS: US revealed calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) deposits in menisci, HC, and tendon more frequently in patients with CPPD than in control patients. The presence of US CPP deposits in SF was not significantly different between the two groups. Combined US evaluation of the three components (menisci, HC, and tendon) showed the best diagnostic performance. The sensitivity and specificity for US evaluation of the three components were 74.4% and 77.1%, respectively, while for CR evaluation, the sensitivity and specificity were 44.2% and 96.9%, respectively. Inter- and intra-observer agreement were excellent for medial (κ = 0.930, 0.972) and lateral menisci (κ = 0.905, 0.942), HC (κ = 0.844, 0.957), and SF (κ = 0.817, 0.925). Tendon showed fair inter-observer (κ = 0.532) and good intra-observer reliability (κ = 0.788). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the OMERACT definition, US demonstrated better diagnostic capacity than CR to diagnose CPPD, with excellent reliability. Combined evaluation of menisci, HC, and tendon showed the best diagnostic accuracy.
Authors: Sara K Tedeschi; Fabio Becce; Tristan Pascart; Ali Guermazi; Jean-François Budzik; Nicola Dalbeth; Georgios Filippou; Annamaria Iagnocco; Minna J Kohler; Jean-Denis Laredo; Stacy E Smith; F Joseph Simeone; Janeth Yinh; Hyon Choi; Abhishek Abhishek Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 5.178