Yong I Jeong1, Gregory A Christoforidis2, Niloufar Saadat2, Keigo Kawaji2,3,4, Charles G Cantrell2, Steven Roth5, Marek Niekrasz6, Timothy J Carroll2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 6. Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This work sought to compare a quantitative T1 bookend dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI based perfusion protocol for absolute cerebral blood flow (qCBF) against CBF measured by the stable-isotope neutron capture microsphere method, a recognized reference standard for measuring tissue blood flow, at normocapnia, hypercapnia, and in acute stroke. METHODS: CBF was measured in anesthetized female canines by MRI and microspheres over 2 consecutive days for each case. On day 1, 5 canines were measured before and during a physiological challenge induced by carbogen inhalation; on day 2, 4 canines were measured following permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. CBF and cerebrovascular reactivity measured by MRI and microsphere deposition were compared. RESULTS: MRI correlated strongly with microspheres at the hemispheric level for CBF during normo- and hypercapnic states (r2 = 0.96), for individual cerebrovascular reactivity (r2 = 0.84), and for postocclusion CBF (r2 = 0.82). Correction for the delay and dispersion of the contrast bolus resulted in a significant improvement in the correlation between MRI and microsphere deposition in the ischemic state (r2 = 0.96). In all comparisons, moderate correlations were found at the regional level. CONCLUSION: In an experimental canine model with and without permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral artery, MRI-based qCBF yielded moderate to strong correlations for absolute quantitative CBF and cerebrovascular reactivity measurements during normocapnia and hypercapnia. Correction for delay and dispersion greatly improved the quantitation during occlusion of the middle cerebral artery, underscoring the importance for this correction under focal ischemic condition.
PURPOSE: This work sought to compare a quantitative T1 bookend dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI based perfusion protocol for absolute cerebral blood flow (qCBF) against CBF measured by the stable-isotope neutron capture microsphere method, a recognized reference standard for measuring tissue blood flow, at normocapnia, hypercapnia, and in acute stroke. METHODS: CBF was measured in anesthetized female canines by MRI and microspheres over 2 consecutive days for each case. On day 1, 5 canines were measured before and during a physiological challenge induced by carbogen inhalation; on day 2, 4 canines were measured following permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. CBF and cerebrovascular reactivity measured by MRI and microsphere deposition were compared. RESULTS: MRI correlated strongly with microspheres at the hemispheric level for CBF during normo- and hypercapnic states (r2 = 0.96), for individual cerebrovascular reactivity (r2 = 0.84), and for postocclusion CBF (r2 = 0.82). Correction for the delay and dispersion of the contrast bolus resulted in a significant improvement in the correlation between MRI and microsphere deposition in the ischemic state (r2 = 0.96). In all comparisons, moderate correlations were found at the regional level. CONCLUSION: In an experimental canine model with and without permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral artery, MRI-based qCBF yielded moderate to strong correlations for absolute quantitative CBF and cerebrovascular reactivity measurements during normocapnia and hypercapnia. Correction for delay and dispersion greatly improved the quantitation during occlusion of the middle cerebral artery, underscoring the importance for this correction under focal ischemic condition.
Authors: K M Donahue; R M Weisskoff; D A Chesler; K K Kwong; A A Bogdanov; J B Mandeville; B R Rosen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 1996-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Raul G Nogueira; Ashutosh P Jadhav; Diogo C Haussen; Alain Bonafe; Ronald F Budzik; Parita Bhuva; Dileep R Yavagal; Marc Ribo; Christophe Cognard; Ricardo A Hanel; Cathy A Sila; Ameer E Hassan; Monica Millan; Elad I Levy; Peter Mitchell; Michael Chen; Joey D English; Qaisar A Shah; Frank L Silver; Vitor M Pereira; Brijesh P Mehta; Blaise W Baxter; Michael G Abraham; Pedro Cardona; Erol Veznedaroglu; Frank R Hellinger; Lei Feng; Jawad F Kirmani; Demetrius K Lopes; Brian T Jankowitz; Michael R Frankel; Vincent Costalat; Nirav A Vora; Albert J Yoo; Amer M Malik; Anthony J Furlan; Marta Rubiera; Amin Aghaebrahim; Jean-Marc Olivot; Wondwossen G Tekle; Ryan Shields; Todd Graves; Roger J Lewis; Wade S Smith; David S Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; Tudor G Jovin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-11-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gregory A Christoforidis; Cameron Rink; Marinos S Kontzialis; Yousef Mohammad; Regina M Koch; Amir M Abduljalil; Valerie K Bergdall; Sashwati Roy; Savita Khanna; Andrew P Slivka; Michael V Knopp; Chandan K Sen Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 6.016