| Literature DB >> 30737647 |
Lucia Giombini1,2, Sophie Nesbitt3, Jenni Leppanen4, Hannah Cox3, Anna Foxall3, Abigail Easter5, Kate Tchanturia4,6,7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Emotional difficulties in young people (YP) with anorexia nervosa (AN) are well recognised. Improved strategies are needed to support inpatients to tolerate group therapy and to help them to better identify and manage their emotions. Cognitive Remediation and Emotion Skills Training (CREST) for AN adults, aimed at improving emotional processing skills, has been found beneficial in adult AN groups. A case series of CREST was conducted in an inpatient ward for YP (CREST-YP) to evaluate its suitability for a younger population.Entities:
Keywords: Anorexia nervosa; Clinicians’ experience; Emotion skills training; Service users’ experience; Young people
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30737647 PMCID: PMC6647864 DOI: 10.1007/s40519-019-00646-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eat Weight Disord ISSN: 1124-4909 Impact factor: 4.652
Young people experience of CREST-YP: higher-order themes and lower-order themes
| Higher-order themes | Lower-order themes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Exploring emotions | 32 (100) | Importance of identifying and understanding emotions | 14 (43.75) |
| Difficulty in sharing emotional experiences | 18 (56.25) | ||
| Emotions and eating disorder | 18 (56.25) | Group felt unrelated to eating disorders | 11 (34.37) |
| Helpful in managing emotions related to eating disorder | 7 (21.87) | ||
| Homework | 21 (65.62) | Unnecessary in completing homework | 15 (46.87) |
| Tool for reinforcing learning | 6 (18.75) | ||
| Suggestions for improvement | 31 (96.87) | Need for visual tool and interactive activities in smaller groups | 18 (56.25) |
| Need for diverse content | 13 (40.62) |
Facilitators’ experience of CREST-YP: higher-order themes and lower-order themes
| Higher-order themes | Lower-order themes | Quotes |
|---|---|---|
| Helpfulness | Differentiating thoughts and feelings | I think the YP liked the fact that some information and knowledge they might not have heard of before, meaning they actually managed to learn something new and useful from the group. An example of this might be a certain coping strategy in managing a particular emotion |
| Learning about coping strategies | ||
| Learning about functions and effects of emotions | ||
| Relevance of emotions | Value of emotions in everyone’s life | The topics of the sessions felt very relevant given that emotions are such a big part of our everyday life. Therefore you’re able to share personal experiences of a given emotion. So, I feel perhaps better able to understand and relate to the contents of the CREST group and I wonder if the young people see that too, that you are on the same page and that as facilitators we experience these emotions too |
| Increased connection between facilitators and YP with regard to emotions | ||
| Less challenging talking about emotions compared to ED | ||
| The link with the ED | Difficult to assess | A few of the older children, aged 15 and above, shared that they felt the group had impacted upon their ED and were able to make the link between the ED and emotions. However, with the younger ones, just from looking at the feedback we get each week, I don’t think this is the case |
| Increased willingness to ask for support | ||
| Helpfulness in managing the anxiety at the core of the ED | ||
| The experience of homework | Easy to forget | Some of the YP did do the homework, it tended to be the same YP each week. In general the majority of the YP did not do the homework each week. I do think that not doing it was often more to do with forgetting though rather than due to the content. Often the response of YP was quite dismissive to homework being set |
| Only few YP showed commitment | ||
| Signals of boredom and annoyance | ||
| Specifics of children vs. adolescents | Difficulties in understanding the link between emotions and ED | The sessions are very discussion based. This works better with the older kids and when the group are engaging and verbally contributing. It doesn’t work so well with the younger ones who don’t feel as comfortable talking in front of the group |
| Preferences for interactive games and videos | ||
| Preferences for small group work | ||
| Less verbal interactions | ||
| Suggestions for further improvements | Discussions and activities in smaller groups | I think definitely to look at the use of child friendly cognitive games. Maybe also less information in some of the sessions so there is more time to split into smaller groups and feedback as I think smaller group work improves overall engagement with the session |
| Increased number of games and use of videos | ||
| Increased child-friendly material | ||
| Increased exploration of positive emotions | ||
| Make the link between emotions and ED clear |
Descriptive and statistical differences between Emotional Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQCA), Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (RSAS), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and Motivational Ruler (MR) subscales pre- and post-CREST-YP
| Mean | SD | SMCC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERQCA | ||||
| Reappraisal (pre) | 22.28 | 7.3 | Time: Age: | 0.22 |
| Reappraisal (post) | 23.94 | 6.98 | ||
| Suppression (pre) | 15.34 | 3.98 | Time: Age: | − 0.22 |
| Suppression (post) | 16.22 | 4.22 | ||
| RSAS | ||||
| RSAS (pre) | 13.94 | 8.52 | Time: Age: | 0.06 |
| RSAS (post) | 13.62 | 8.82 | ||
| TAS-20 | ||||
| Global score (pre) | 58.44 | 11.70 | Time: Age: | 0.10 |
| Global score (post) | 57.66 | 12.53 | ||
| MRI | ||||
| Importance to change (pre) | 6.78 | 2.51 | Time: Age: | 0.02 |
| Importance to change (post) | 6.81 | 2.61 | ||
| Ability to change (pre) | 5.88 | 2.85 | Time: Age: | 0.19 |
| Ability to change (post) | 6.20 | 2.70 | ||