Ding Dou1,2, Bing Yang3, Hongqiao Gan3, Dengpiao Xie4, Huangwei Lei5, Naijing Ye6,7. 1. Basic Medical College of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, Sichuan, China. 2. Traditional Chinese Medical Department of Zunyi Medical and Pharmaceutical College, Zunyi, 563006, Guizhou, China. 3. Sichuan 2nd Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. 4. Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. 5. Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China. 6. Sichuan 2nd Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. 3598962951@qq.com. 7. Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. 3598962951@qq.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of vitamin D on vascular function remains controversial in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. The aim of the present work was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of vitamin D on vascular function in CKD patients. METHODS: We searched Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, the Science Citation Index, and clinical trial registries for randomized controlled trials comparing vitamin D with a placebo in CKD patients. RESULTS: We included seven trials. For flow-mediated dilation (FMD), there was no significant difference between the two groups (WMD 1.66%; 95% CI - 0.2 to 3.51, p = 0.08; with significant heterogeneity, p < 0.0001, I2 = 89%). We conducted a subgroup analysis. In the cholecalciferol group, compared with the placebo group, cholecalciferol significantly increased FMD (WMD 5.49%; 95% CI 4.36-6.62, p < 0.0001). In the 2 ug paricalcitol group, compared with the placebo group, paricalcitol significantly increased FMD (WMD 2.09%; 95% CI 1.28-2.9, p < 0.0001; without significant heterogeneity, p = 0.47, I2 = 0%). In the 1 ug paricalcitol group, there was no significant difference between the two groups. For pulse wave velocity (PWV), vitamin D significantly decreased PWV compared with the placebo (WMD - 0.93 m/s; 95% CI - 1.71 to - 0.15, p = 0.02; without significant heterogeneity, p = 0.14, I2 = 45%). For calcium (Ca) and parathyroid hormone (PTH), there was a significant difference between the vitamin D group and the placebo group. For 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], there was a significant difference between the inactive vitamin D group and the placebo group. For phosphorus (P), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), there were no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We speculate that vitamin D might be able to improve vascular function in CKD patients. The effect of vitamin D might be associated with its doses and earlier stages of the disease might respond better to vitamin D. Furthermore, trials with larger populations and longer durations are needed in order to provide more reliable evidence.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of vitamin D on vascular function remains controversial in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. The aim of the present work was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of vitamin D on vascular function in CKDpatients. METHODS: We searched Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, the Science Citation Index, and clinical trial registries for randomized controlled trials comparing vitamin D with a placebo in CKDpatients. RESULTS: We included seven trials. For flow-mediated dilation (FMD), there was no significant difference between the two groups (WMD 1.66%; 95% CI - 0.2 to 3.51, p = 0.08; with significant heterogeneity, p < 0.0001, I2 = 89%). We conducted a subgroup analysis. In the cholecalciferol group, compared with the placebo group, cholecalciferol significantly increased FMD (WMD 5.49%; 95% CI 4.36-6.62, p < 0.0001). In the 2 ug paricalcitol group, compared with the placebo group, paricalcitol significantly increased FMD (WMD 2.09%; 95% CI 1.28-2.9, p < 0.0001; without significant heterogeneity, p = 0.47, I2 = 0%). In the 1 ug paricalcitol group, there was no significant difference between the two groups. For pulse wave velocity (PWV), vitamin D significantly decreased PWV compared with the placebo (WMD - 0.93 m/s; 95% CI - 1.71 to - 0.15, p = 0.02; without significant heterogeneity, p = 0.14, I2 = 45%). For calcium (Ca) and parathyroid hormone (PTH), there was a significant difference between the vitamin D group and the placebo group. For 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], there was a significant difference between the inactive vitamin D group and the placebo group. For phosphorus (P), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), there were no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We speculate that vitamin D might be able to improve vascular function in CKDpatients. The effect of vitamin D might be associated with its doses and earlier stages of the disease might respond better to vitamin D. Furthermore, trials with larger populations and longer durations are needed in order to provide more reliable evidence.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chronic kidney disease; Vascular function; Vitamin D
Authors: Dick de Zeeuw; Rajiv Agarwal; Michael Amdahl; Paul Audhya; Daniel Coyne; Tushar Garimella; Hans-Henrik Parving; Yili Pritchett; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Eberhard Ritz; Dennis Andress Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kristen L Jablonski; Michel Chonchol; Gary L Pierce; Ashley E Walker; Douglas R Seals Journal: Hypertension Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: J Ruth Wu-Wong; William Noonan; Masaki Nakane; Kristin A Brooks; Jason A Segreti; James S Polakowski; Bryan Cox Journal: Int J Endocrinol Date: 2010-02-10 Impact factor: 3.257
Authors: Geoffrey A Block; Preston S Klassen; J Michael Lazarus; Norma Ofsthun; Edmund G Lowrie; Glenn M Chertow Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Pooneh Alborzi; Nina A Patel; Carla Peterson; Jennifer E Bills; Dagim M Bekele; Zerihun Bunaye; Robert P Light; Rajiv Agarwal Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-07-07 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: M Wolf; A Shah; O Gutierrez; E Ankers; M Monroy; H Tamez; D Steele; Y Chang; C A Camargo; M Tonelli; R Thadhani Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2007-08-08 Impact factor: 10.612