| Literature DB >> 30737419 |
Tomoki Nishioka1, Malek Marian1, Issei Kobayashi2, Yuhko Kobayashi2, Kyosuke Yamamoto3, Hideyuki Tamaki3, Haruhisa Suga4, Masafumi Shimizu5.
Abstract
Crop rotation and intercropping with Allium plants suppresses Fusarium wilt in various crops. However, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon have not been fully elucidated. This study was designed to assess the role of microorganisms inhabiting Allium rhizospheres and antifungal compounds produced by Allium roots in Fusarium wilt suppression by Allium cultivation. Suppression of cucumber Fusarium wilt and the pathogen multiplication by Allium (Welsh onion and/or onion)-cultivated soils were eliminated by heat treatment at 60 °C, whereas those by Welsh onion-root extract were lost at 40 °C. The addition of antibacterial antibiotics eliminated the suppressive effect of Welsh onion-cultivated soil on pathogen multiplication, suggesting the contribution of antagonistic gram-negative bacteria to the soil suppressiveness. The Illumina MiSeq sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons revealed that genus Flavobacterium was the predominant group that preferentially accumulated in Allium rhizospheres. Flavobacterium species recovered from the rhizosphere soils of these Allium plants suppressed Fusarium wilt on cucumber seedlings. Furthermore, confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed that Flavobacterium isolates inhibited the multiplication of the pathogen in soil. Taken together, we infer that the accumulation of antagonistic Flavobacterium species plays a key role in Fusarium wilt suppression by Allium cultivation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30737419 PMCID: PMC6368641 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37559-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Effect of heat treatment on the suppressive ability of Allium-cultivated soils and soil supplemented with root extract of Welsh onion against cucumber Fusarium wilt. (a) Disease index in each cultivated soil and non-cultivated soil. Bars represent mean ± SD (n = 4), and the different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between plant treatments (a–b) and between heat treatments (x–y) (P < 0.01, Tukey’s test). (b) Disease index in soil supplemented with root extract of Welsh onion. Bars represent mean ± SD (n = 3), and the different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.01, Tukey’s test).
Effect of heat treatment on population densities of culturable bacteria and fungi in Allium plant-cultivated soils (cfu gram−1 dry soil).
| Rhizosphere soil | Microorganism | Heat treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No treatment | 40 °C | 60 °C | 80 °C | 121 °C | ||
| Welsh onion | Bacteria | |||||
| Gram-negative | 0.7–1.3 × 108 | 0.6–1.1 × 108 | <2.8 × 106 | ND | ND | |
| Gram-positive | 0.7–1.0 × 108 | 5.0–9.7 × 107 | 2.0–3.9 × 107 | 1.9–3.5 × 107 | ND | |
| Fungi | 0.8–3.1 × 106 | 0.5–2.4 × 106 | 0.3–1.8 × 104 | <1.5 × 102 | ND | |
| Onion | Bacteria | |||||
| Gram-negative | 3.4–6.0 × 107 | 2.6–4.7 × 107 | <1.9 × 106 | ND | ND | |
| Gram-positive | 4.0–6.7 × 107 | 2.1–3.0 × 107 | 2.0–3.0 × 107 | 2.3–2.7 × 107 | ND | |
| Fungi | 2.4–2.7 × 105 | 1.5–1.8 × 105 | 2.3–3.7 × 103 | <2.3 × 102 | ND | |
The culturable bacterial densities were estimated using 1/10 strength tryptic soy agar, and Gram reaction was determined using the KOH method. The culturable fungal densities were estimated using rose bengal-streptomycin agar. The experiment was repeated three times. ND: not detected.
Inhibitory effect of Welsh onion-cultivated soil and root extracts on multiplication of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum in liquid medium.
| Experiment | Type of amendment in the liquid mediuma | Heat/Antibiotics treatment | Focu density (log spores ml−1)e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment 1 | Welsh onion-cultivated soilb | No treatment | 5.76 ± 0.10 a |
| 40 °C | 5.82 ± 0.09 a | ||
| 60 °C | 6.13 ± 0.02 b | ||
| Cucumber-cultivated soilb | No treatment | 6.11 ± 0.04 b | |
| Non-cultivated soilb | No treatment | 6.21 ± 0.05 b | |
| Control (SDW) | No treatment | 6.58 ± 0.03 c | |
| Experiment 2 | Welsh onion-cultivated soilb | No treatment | 5.78 ± 0.23 a |
| Antibioticsd | 6.30 ± 0.08 b | ||
| Control (SDW) | No treatment | 6.77 ± 0.09 b | |
| Antibiotics | 6.63 ± 0.12 b | ||
| Experiment 3 | Welsh onion-root extractc | No treatment | 6.01 ± 0.37 a |
| 40 °C | 6.78 ± 0.16 b | ||
| 60 °C | 6.75 ± 0.16 b | ||
| Cucumber-root extractc | No treatment | 6.86 ± 0.09 b | |
| Control (SDW) | No treatment | 6.81 ± 0.03 b |
aLiquid medium: potato sucrose broth including the spores of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum.
bWelsh onion-cultivated soil, cucumber-cultivated soil, or non-cultivated soil was 1000-fold diluted with sterile distilled water, and then a 0.3 ml of each 1000-fold dilution of soils was added into the liquid medium.
cThe concentrations of Welsh onion- and cucumber-root extract were 50 mg root material per ml. A 1.5 ml of each root extract was added into the liquid medium.
dAntibiotics means a mixture of antibacterial antibiotics comprising ampicillin (300 µg ml−1), imipenem (300 µg ml−1), and chloramphenicol (300 µg ml−1).
eMean ± SD shown (n = 3). For each experiment, figures followed by different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.01, Tukey’s test).
Figure 2Contrasted clustering of each rhizosphere soil and non-cultivated soil samples based on OTUs composition according to Bray–Curtis similarity. Wo: Welsh onion rhizosphere soil, On: onion rhizosphere soil, Cu: cucumber rhizosphere soil, and Ns: non-cultivated soil. There were three replicates for each type of soils.
Relative abundances of genera comprising more than 1.0% of genera either in each rhizosphere soil (Welsh onion, onion, or cucumber), or non-cultivated soil.
| Genus | Welsh onion | Onion | Cucumber | Non-cultivated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.3 ± 0.1 b | 0.1 ± 0.2 b | 1.0 ± 0.3 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 b |
|
| 1.7 ± 0.1 a | 0.7 ± 0.3 b | 2.3 ± 0.4 a | 1.9 ± 0.4 a |
|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 b | 0.2 ± 0.2 b | 1.1 ± 0.1 a | 0.4 ± 0.3 b |
|
| 1.9 ± 0.1 ab | 2.4 ± 0.6 a | 2.4 ± 0.9 a | 0.8 ± 0.2 b |
|
| 0.6 ± 0.3 b | 0.5 ± 0.2 b | 1.4 ± 0.0 a | 0.4 ± 0.1 b |
|
| 3.4 ± 0.3 a | 1.7 ± 0.4 b | 0.2 ± 0.2 c | 0.4 ± 0.3 c |
|
| 1.3 ± 0.3 a | 1.5 ± 0.3 a | 2.1 ± 0.9 a | 2.1 ± 0.8 a |
|
| 0.8 ± 0.1 b | 1.8 ± 0.2 a | 0.3 ± 0.3 bc | 0.1 ± 0.1 c |
|
| 0.3 ± 0.1 b | 0.1 ± 0.1 b | 0.5 ± 0.0 b | 1.2 ± 0.3 a |
|
| 0.1 ± 0.1 b | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 2.0 ± 0.6 a | 0.3 ± 0.1 b |
|
| 0.4 ± 0.1 b | 0.1 ± 0.1 b | 1.6 ± 0.5 a | 0.2 ± 0.1 b |
|
| 1.0 ± 0.3 a | 0.8 ± 0.1 a | 0.9 ± 0.3 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 b |
|
| 0.6 ± 0.3 a | 0.6 ± 0.1 a | 0.6 ± 0.3 a | 1.1 ± 0.3 a |
|
| 0.5 ± 0.1 b | 0.5 ± 0.1 b | 1.4 ± 0.3 a | 0.6 ± 0.2 b |
|
| 0.7 ± 0.5 b | 1.2 ± 0.2 ab | 1.1 ± 0.1 ab | 1.8 ± 0.4 a |
|
| 1.1 ± 0.5 a | 0.4 ± 0.2 ab | 0.7 ± 0.2 ab | 0.2 ± 0.0 b |
Mean ± SD shown (n = 3). Different lowercase letters within a row indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05, Tukey’s test).
Figure 3Box-plot showing the suppressive effect of Flavobacterium isolates and Chryseobacterium isolates against cucumber Fusarium wilt. Nineteen isolates of Flavobacterium species and 15 isolates of Chryseobacterium species were assessed. The box-plot shows the minimum, maximum, 25–75%, and median values of the relative disease index. Vertical bars extending beyond the boxes represent the 5th and 95th percentiles. Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U-test).
Figure 4Confocal laser scanning microscopy of FocuGFP-10 in bacterized soil. (a) Non-bacterized, (b) Chryseobacterium isolate GUAF6006, (c) Flavobacterium isolate GUAF6006, (d) Flavobacterium isolate GUAF6009, and (e) Flavobacterium isolate GUAC6072. Data are representative of nine images. (f) Mean total length of FocuGFP-10 hyphae in each camera field of view. Bars represent mean of three replications, and the different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.01, Tukey’s test).