Niels J Rupp1, Christoph A Umbricht2, Daniele A Pizzuto3, Daniela Lenggenhager1, Antonia Töpfer1, Julian Müller3, Urs J Muehlematter3, Daniela A Ferraro3, Michael Messerli3, Grégoire B Morand4, Gerhard F Huber5, Daniel Eberli6, Roger Schibli2, Cristina Müller2, Irene A Burger7. 1. Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Switzerland. 2. Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Switzerland. 4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Switzerland. 5. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland; and. 6. Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Switzerland. 7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Switzerland Irene.burger@usz.ch.
Abstract
The intense accumulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligands in salivary glands is still not well understood. It is of concern for therapeutic applications of PSMA radioligands, because therapeutic radiation will damage these glands. A better understanding of the uptake mechanism is, therefore, crucial to find solutions to reduce toxicity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the accumulation of PSMA-targeting radioligands in submandibular glands (SMGs) can be explained with PSMA expression levels using autoradiography (ARG) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: All patients gave written informed consent for further utility of the biologic material. The SMG of 9 patients, pancreatic tissue of 4 patients, and prostate cancer (PCA) lesions of 9 patients were analyzed. Tissue specimens were analyzed by means of PSMA-IHC (using an anti-PSMA-antibody and an immunoreactivity score system [IRS]) and ARG using 177Lu-PSMA-617 (with quantification of the relative signal intensity compared with a PSMA-positive standard). The SUVmax in salivary glands, pancreas, and PCA tissues were quantified in 60 clinical 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scans for recurrent disease as well as the 9 primary tumors selected for ARG and IHC. Results: PCA tissue samples revealed a wide range of PSMA staining intensity on IHC (IRS = 70-300) as well as in ARG (1.3%-22% of standard). This variability on PCA tissue could also be observed in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET (SUVmax, 4.4-16) with a significant correlation between ARG and SUVmax (P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.897). On IHC, ARG, and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET, the pancreatic tissue was negative (IRS = 0, ARG = 0.1% ± 0.05%, SUVmax of 3.1 ± 1.1). The SMG tissue displayed only focal expression of PSMA limited to the intercalated ducts on IHC (IRS = 10-15) and a minimal signal on ARG (1.3% ± 0.9%). In contrast, all SMG showed a high 68Ga-PSMA-11 accumulation on PET scans (SUVmax 23.5 ± 5.2). Conclusion: Our results indicate that the high accumulation of PSMA radioligands in salivary glands does not correspond to high PSMA expression levels determined using ARG and IHC. These findings provide evidence, that the significant accumulation of PSMA radioligands in SMG is not primarily a result of PSMA-mediated uptake.
The intense accumulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligands in salivary glands is still not well understood. It is of concern for therapeutic applications of PSMA radioligands, because therapeutic radiation will damage these glands. A better understanding of the uptake mechanism is, therefore, crucial to find solutions to reduce toxicity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the accumulation of PSMA-targeting radioligands in submandibular glands (SMGs) can be explained with PSMA expression levels using autoradiography (ARG) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: All patients gave written informed consent for further utility of the biologic material. The SMG of 9 patients, pancreatic tissue of 4 patients, and prostate cancer (PCA) lesions of 9 patients were analyzed. Tissue specimens were analyzed by means of PSMA-IHC (using an anti-PSMA-antibody and an immunoreactivity score system [IRS]) and ARG using 177Lu-PSMA-617 (with quantification of the relative signal intensity compared with a PSMA-positive standard). The SUVmax in salivary glands, pancreas, and PCA tissues were quantified in 60 clinical 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scans for recurrent disease as well as the 9 primary tumors selected for ARG and IHC. Results: PCA tissue samples revealed a wide range of PSMA staining intensity on IHC (IRS = 70-300) as well as in ARG (1.3%-22% of standard). This variability on PCA tissue could also be observed in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET (SUVmax, 4.4-16) with a significant correlation between ARG and SUVmax (P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.897). On IHC, ARG, and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET, the pancreatic tissue was negative (IRS = 0, ARG = 0.1% ± 0.05%, SUVmax of 3.1 ± 1.1). The SMG tissue displayed only focal expression of PSMA limited to the intercalated ducts on IHC (IRS = 10-15) and a minimal signal on ARG (1.3% ± 0.9%). In contrast, all SMG showed a high 68Ga-PSMA-11 accumulation on PET scans (SUVmax 23.5 ± 5.2). Conclusion: Our results indicate that the high accumulation of PSMA radioligands in salivary glands does not correspond to high PSMA expression levels determined using ARG and IHC. These findings provide evidence, that the significant accumulation of PSMA radioligands in SMG is not primarily a result of PSMA-mediated uptake.
Authors: Frédéric Bois; Camille Noirot; Sébastien Dietemann; Ismini C Mainta; Thomas Zilli; Valentina Garibotto; Martin A Walter Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-12-15
Authors: Wesley R Armstrong; Andrei Gafita; Shaojun Zhu; Pan Thin; Kathleen Nguyen; Rejah Alano; Stephanie Lira; Kiara Booker; Linda Gardner; Tristan Grogan; David Elashoff; Martin Allen-Auerbach; Magnus Dahlbom; Johannes Czernin; Jeremie Calais Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Wim van Boxtel; Susanne Lütje; Ilse C H van Engen-van Grunsven; Gerald W Verhaegh; Jack A Schalken; Marianne A Jonker; James Nagarajah; Martin Gotthardt; Carla M L van Herpen Journal: Theranostics Date: 2020-01-12 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Daniela A Ferraro; Jan H Rüschoff; Urs J Muehlematter; Benedikt Kranzbühler; Julian Müller; Michael Messerli; Lars Husmann; Thomas Hermanns; Daniel Eberli; Niels J Rupp; Irene A Burger Journal: Theranostics Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 11.556