Sreelatha Naik1,2, Moh'd Al-Halawani2,3,4, Iouri Kreinin2,3, Meir Kryger2,3. 1. Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Geisinger Health System, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. 2. Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut. 3. Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 4. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement for positive airway pressure (PAP) devices for obstructive sleep apnea treatment is dependent on patients meeting adherence expectations within the first 3 months on therapy. Adherence is defined as usage of the device for at least 4 hours per night on 70% of nights during a consecutive 30-day period. We hypothesize that the adherence pattern may be established beyond this initial period, which may limit the opportunity to treat many patients. METHODS: Treatment and adherence data from PAP devices were monitored via wireless modems for 42 consecutive PAP-naïve military veterans who completed 1 year of nightly monitoring. Their baseline characteristics were as follows: age (mean ± standard deviation) 58.5 ± 12.5 years; body mass index 33.7 ± 5.7 kg/m2; diagnostic apnea-hypopnea index (pretreatment) 28.1 ± 18.5 events/h; apnea-hypopnea index on PAP: 4.3 ± 3.3 events/h. We examined daily, monthly, quarterly, semiannual, and annual reports, and the best 30-day adherence report for each quarter. RESULTS: In the first 3 months, 19 of 42 participants were adherent by CMS criteria, and 23 of 42 participants were not. Of the 19 adherent participants, 13 remained adherent and 6 became nonadherent or stopped PAP treatment for the remainder of the year. In the 23 initially nonadherent participants, 16 stopped PAP treatment, and 7 participants (30.4%) became adherent (using CMS criteria) during the rest of the year. Thus, PAP adherence during the first 3 months was predictive for the rest of the year in only 68.4%. PAP nonadherence during the first 3 months was predictive for further nonadherence in only 69.6% of the cases. Overall, this led to a 65% sensitivity and 72% specificity of using adherence at 3 months in predicting adherence at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: CMS adherence criteria affecting PAP coverage are restrictive and can result in the withholding of therapy in many patients who otherwise might become adherent. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, Title: Remote Monitoring in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Identifier: NCT01678560, URL: https:// clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01678560.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement for positive airway pressure (PAP) devices for obstructive sleep apnea treatment is dependent on patients meeting adherence expectations within the first 3 months on therapy. Adherence is defined as usage of the device for at least 4 hours per night on 70% of nights during a consecutive 30-day period. We hypothesize that the adherence pattern may be established beyond this initial period, which may limit the opportunity to treat many patients. METHODS: Treatment and adherence data from PAP devices were monitored via wireless modems for 42 consecutive PAP-naïve military veterans who completed 1 year of nightly monitoring. Their baseline characteristics were as follows: age (mean ± standard deviation) 58.5 ± 12.5 years; body mass index 33.7 ± 5.7 kg/m2; diagnostic apnea-hypopnea index (pretreatment) 28.1 ± 18.5 events/h; apnea-hypopnea index on PAP: 4.3 ± 3.3 events/h. We examined daily, monthly, quarterly, semiannual, and annual reports, and the best 30-day adherence report for each quarter. RESULTS: In the first 3 months, 19 of 42 participants were adherent by CMS criteria, and 23 of 42 participants were not. Of the 19 adherent participants, 13 remained adherent and 6 became nonadherent or stopped PAP treatment for the remainder of the year. In the 23 initially nonadherent participants, 16 stopped PAP treatment, and 7 participants (30.4%) became adherent (using CMS criteria) during the rest of the year. Thus, PAP adherence during the first 3 months was predictive for the rest of the year in only 68.4%. PAP nonadherence during the first 3 months was predictive for further nonadherence in only 69.6% of the cases. Overall, this led to a 65% sensitivity and 72% specificity of using adherence at 3 months in predicting adherence at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: CMS adherence criteria affecting PAP coverage are restrictive and can result in the withholding of therapy in many patients who otherwise might become adherent. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, Title: Remote Monitoring in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Identifier: NCT01678560, URL: https:// clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01678560.
Authors: T E Weaver; N B Kribbs; A I Pack; L R Kline; D K Chugh; G Maislin; P L Smith; A R Schwartz; N M Schubert; K A Gillen; D F Dinges Journal: Sleep Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Lichuan Ye; Atul Malhotra; Karen Kayser; Danny G Willis; June A Horowitz; Mark S Aloia; Terri E Weaver Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Nurit Fox; A J Hirsch-Allen; Elizabeth Goodfellow; Joshua Wenner; John Fleetham; C Frank Ryan; Mila Kwiatkowska; Najib T Ayas Journal: Sleep Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Francisco Campos-Rodriguez; Nicolas Peña-Griñan; Nuria Reyes-Nuñez; Ines De la Cruz-Moron; Jose Perez-Ronchel; Francisco De la Vega-Gallardo; Ana Fernandez-Palacin Journal: Chest Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: N B Kribbs; A I Pack; L R Kline; P L Smith; A R Schwartz; N M Schubert; S Redline; J N Henry; J E Getsy; D F Dinges Journal: Am Rev Respir Dis Date: 1993-04
Authors: Cathy A Alessi; Constance H Fung; Joseph M Dzierzewski; Lavinia Fiorentino; Carl Stepnowsky; Juan C Rodriguez Tapia; Yeonsu Song; Michelle R Zeidler; Karen Josephson; Michael N Mitchell; Stella Jouldjian; Jennifer L Martin Journal: Sleep Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Douglas B Kirsch; Hongmei Yang; Andréa L Maslow; Michael Stolzenbach; Andrea McCall Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-09-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Priya V Borker; Emely Carmona; Utibe R Essien; Gul Jana Saeed; S Mehdi Nouraie; Jessie P Bakker; Christy J Stitt; Mark S Aloia; Sanjay R Patel Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: Karin G Johnson; Vida Rastegar; Nicholas Scuderi; Douglas C Johnson; Paul Visintainer Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 4.324