| Literature DB >> 30736370 |
Sherif S Ebada1,2,3, Werner E G Müller4, Wenhan Lin5, Peter Proksch6.
Abstract
A new acylic jasplakinolide congener (2), another acyclic derivative requiring revision (4), together with two <span class="Chemical">jasplakinolide derivatives including the parent compound jasplakinolide (1) were isolated from the Indonesian marine sponge Jaspis splendens. The chemical structures of the new and known compounds were unambiguously elucidated based on HRESIMS and exhaustive 1D and 2D NMR spectral analysis as well as a comparison of their NMR data with those of jasplakinolide (1). The isolated jasplakinolides inhibited the growth of mouse lymphoma (L5178Y) cells in vitro with IC50 values in the low micromolar to nanomolar range.Entities:
Keywords: Jaspis splendens; cytotoxic activity; jasplakinolide Z5; jasplakinolide Z6
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30736370 PMCID: PMC6409940 DOI: 10.3390/md17020100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structures of 1–5.
1H and 13C NMR data of 2 and 4.
| pos. | 2 | 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δH ( | δC, type | δH ( | δC, type | |
| 1 | 168.3, CO | 168.5, CO | ||
| 2 | 5.13, s | 99.7, CH | 3.87, d (16.0) | 45.8, CH2 |
| 3.73, d (16.0) | ||||
| 3 | 153.4, C | 192.7, CO | ||
| 4 | 168.3, C | 173.9, CO | ||
| 5 | 5.90, dd (11.5, 4.5) | 56.1, CH | 5.67, dd (11.4, 4.8) | 56.6, CH |
| 6 | 173.3, CO | 174.7, CO | ||
| 7 | 4.65, p (6.7) | 44.9, CH | 4.40, q (6.9) | 45.9, CH |
| 8 | 174.1, CO | 178.2, CO | ||
| 9 | 2.64, ddd (11.5, 6.9, 2.1) | 36.3, CH | 2.39, dq (14.1, 6.9) | 39.0, CH |
| 10 | 2.22, dd (16.8. 11.6) | 40.0, CH2 | 2.20, dd (13.5, 6.7) | 44.0, CH2 |
| 1.69, d (16.8) | 1.87, dd (13.5, 8.1) | |||
| 11 | 133.0, C | 132.2, C | ||
| 12 | 4.73, m | 125.8, CH | 4.87, d (9.7) | 133.3, CH |
| 13 | 2.30, dq (10.8, 5.4, 4.5) | 28.8, CH | 2.31, dq (14.0, 6.9) | 29.3, CH |
| 14 | 1.46, m | 43.2, CH2 | 1.52, dd (14.0, 7.3) | 43.7, CH2 |
| 1.29, ddd (12.8, 9.9, 3.9) | 1.33, dd (14.0, 6.7) | |||
| 15 | 4.71, m | 68.8, CH | 4.90, m | 71.3, CH |
| 16 | 125.8, C | 128.8, C | ||
| 17 | 6.82, dd (8.2, 2.2) | 119.0, CH | 7.37, dd (8.3, 2.0) | 123.1, CH |
| 17’ | 6.86, d (2.2) | 115.1, CH | 7.39, d (2.0) | 115.5, CH |
| 18 | 6.74, d (8.2) | 115.0, CH | 6.82, d (8.3) | 115.2, CH |
| 18’ | 144.6, C | 145.7, C | ||
| 19 | 147.6, C | 152.0, C | ||
| 20 | 3.16, dd (15.2, 4.4) | 22.1, CH2 | 3.39, dd (15.3, 4.9) | 24.0, CH2 |
| 3.03, dd (15.1, 11.6) | 3.15, dd (15.3, 11.5) | |||
| 21 | 109.4, C | 109.5, C | ||
| 22 | 127.2, C | 127.8, C | ||
| 23 | 7.58, d (8.0) | 118.0, CH | 7.48, d (8.0) | 118.3, CH |
| 24 | 6.99, td (7.2, 0.9) | 119.9, CH | 7.00, t (8.0) | 119.7, CH |
| 25 | 7.06, td (7.2, 0.9) | 121.5, CH | 7.05, t (8.0) | 122.1, CH |
| 26 | 7.24, d (8.0) | 110.6, CH | 7.23, d (8.0) | 111.0, CH |
| 27 | 136.1, C | 137.0, C | ||
| 28 | 108.9, C | 111.0, C | ||
| 29 | 0.42, d (6.7) | 17.2, CH3 | 0.58, d (6.9) | 15.7, CH3 |
| 30 | 0.91, d (6.9) | 20.5, CH3 | 0.96, d (6.9) | 16.8, CH3 |
| 31 | 1.50, s | 18.3, CH3 | 1.48, s | 15.6, CH3 |
| 32 | 0.82, d (6.7) | 22.2, CH3 | 0.82, d (6.6) | 20.6, CH3 |
| 33 | 1.11, d (6.3) | 18.8, CH3 | 1.16, d (6.2) | 19.9, CH3 |
| 34 | 2.91, s | 31.0, CH3 | 3.02, s | 31.7, CH3 |
| N | 11.62, br s | |||
| 7–N | 7.61, d (7.3) | |||
| 3–N | 6.80, br s | |||
| –COOH | 10.95, br s | |||
| OH–18’ | 9.07, br s | |||
| OH–19 | 9.41, br s | |||
Measured in DMSO-d at 600 and 150 MHz. Measured in CDCl3 at 600 and 150 MHz. Carbon type is determined from gHMQC data. Shifts are assigned on the basis of gHMQC and gHMBC data.
Figure 21H NMR spectra of 1 and 2 showing differences in aromatic protons at the β-tyrosine residue.
Figure 3Key 1H–1H COSY, HMBC and ROESY correlations of 2.
Figure 4Key 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations of the tyrosine oxygenated moiety of 4.