BACKGROUND: Trabeculectomy for the surgical reduction of internal eye pressure is an established procedure, but the principle limitations are in postoperative wound healing. Various antimetabolites are regularly used to avoid postoperative subconjunctival scarring. The present study investigates whether the combination of an Ologen implant with bevacizumab can modify the rates of success and/or complications during trabeculectomy. METHODS: Three different groups of patients were evaluated in which trabeculectomy was performed with mitomycin C, either alone (group 1) or in combination with an Ologen implant (group 2) or with an Ologen implant with bevacizumab (group 3). The success and failure rates, changes in tension, postoperative complications and postoperative revision for pressure regulation were evaluated. The follow-up was 12 months for all eyes. RESULTS: A total of 130 eyes in 130 patients (mean age 67.74 ± 12.16 years). The number of substances applied preoperatively to reduce intraocular pressure was 2.89 ± 0.98 and the internal ocular pressure was 21.74 ± 5.49 mmHg. Twelve months postoperatively; the mean pressure was 13.14 ± 3.71 mmHg. The greatest absolute success rate (= IOD ≤ 15 mmHg without antiglaucoma medication) was in the group with exclusive goniotrepanation + mitomycin C (MMC; 72.5%), followed by the groups with Ologen (67.5%) and Ologen + bevacizumab (63.6%). The greatest failure rate (= IOD > 15 mmHg) was in the Ologen bevacizumab group (17.3%), followed by the pure Ologen group with 22.5% and the pure trabeculectomy group (12.3%). There were no significant differences in the success and failure rates. There were no serious intra- or postoperative complications in any group. The number of patients for whom it was necessary to loosen the traction thread was significantly lower in the sole Ologen group (p = 0.02). There were also no significant differences between the groups with respect to revisions. CONCLUSION: Using Ologen as drug depot for bevacizumab in a trabeculectomy (TE) with MMC is a safe and active surgical method without an increased risk of complications in comparison to pure TE with MMC or TE with MMC and Ologen implant. After 12 months, this treatment exhibited no significant advantages. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
BACKGROUND: Trabeculectomy for the surgical reduction of internal eye pressure is an established procedure, but the principle limitations are in postoperative wound healing. Various antimetabolites are regularly used to avoid postoperative subconjunctival scarring. The present study investigates whether the combination of an Ologen implant with bevacizumab can modify the rates of success and/or complications during trabeculectomy. METHODS: Three different groups of patients were evaluated in which trabeculectomy was performed with mitomycin C, either alone (group 1) or in combination with an Ologen implant (group 2) or with an Ologen implant with bevacizumab (group 3). The success and failure rates, changes in tension, postoperative complications and postoperative revision for pressure regulation were evaluated. The follow-up was 12 months for all eyes. RESULTS: A total of 130 eyes in 130 patients (mean age 67.74 ± 12.16 years). The number of substances applied preoperatively to reduce intraocular pressure was 2.89 ± 0.98 and the internal ocular pressure was 21.74 ± 5.49 mmHg. Twelve months postoperatively; the mean pressure was 13.14 ± 3.71 mmHg. The greatest absolute success rate (= IOD ≤ 15 mmHg without antiglaucoma medication) was in the group with exclusive goniotrepanation + mitomycin C (MMC; 72.5%), followed by the groups with Ologen (67.5%) and Ologen + bevacizumab (63.6%). The greatest failure rate (= IOD > 15 mmHg) was in the Ologen bevacizumab group (17.3%), followed by the pure Ologen group with 22.5% and the pure trabeculectomy group (12.3%). There were no significant differences in the success and failure rates. There were no serious intra- or postoperative complications in any group. The number of patients for whom it was necessary to loosen the traction thread was significantly lower in the sole Ologen group (p = 0.02). There were also no significant differences between the groups with respect to revisions. CONCLUSION: Using Ologen as drug depot for bevacizumab in a trabeculectomy (TE) with MMC is a safe and active surgical method without an increased risk of complications in comparison to pure TE with MMC or TE with MMC and Ologen implant. After 12 months, this treatment exhibited no significant advantages. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.