Literature DB >> 30735908

Spatial-numerical association of response code effect as a window to mental representation of magnitude in long-term memory among Hebrew-speaking children.

Anat Feldman1, Yafit Oscar-Strom2, Joseph Tzelgov3, Andrea Berger4.   

Abstract

The well-known spatial-numerical association of response code (SNARC) effect supports the idea that the mental number line (MNL) is organized from left to right in participants writing from left to right. In Arabic speakers writing from right to left, the direction of the SNARC effect is reversed. Until recently, no consistent numerical-spatial associations were reported in Hebrew speakers, who write letters from right to left and write numbers from left to right. However, a left-to-right SNARC effect was recently demonstrated in adult Hebrew readers by reducing the markedness association of response code (MARC) effect, which masks the SNARC effect. Adult Hebrew speakers (especially university students) are skilled English readers and writers, supporting the claim that the direction of reading is not the sole factor contributing to direction of the emergence of the left-to-right organization of the MNL. Thus, to understand the effect of reading habits on the SNARC effect, here we demonstrate the SNARC in young Hebrew-speaking children who read Hebrew letters from right to left, read numbers from left to right, and had little experience in writing English letters from left to right. Our findings, therefore, are innovative in providing supporting evidence for the claim that the direction of reading is not the sole factor contributing to direction of the emergence of the left-to-right organization of the MNL.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Long term memory; MARC effect; Mental number line; Numerical cognition; SNARC effect

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30735908     DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  1 in total

1.  Cultural factors weaken but do not reverse left-to-right spatial biases in numerosity processing: Data from Arabic and English monoliterates and Arabic-English biliterates.

Authors:  Dominique Lopiccolo; Charles B Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.