Literature DB >> 30735675

Same words, different structures: An fMRI investigation of argument relations and the angular gyrus.

William Matchin1, Chia-Hsuan Liao2, Phoebe Gaston2, Ellen Lau2.   

Abstract

In fMRI, increased activation for combinatorial syntactic and semantic processing is typically observed in a set of left hemisphere brain areas: the angular gyrus (AG), the anterior temporal lobe (ATL), the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), and the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Recent work has suggested that semantic combination is supported by the ATL and the AG, with a division of labor in which AG is involved in event concepts and ATL is involved in encoding conceptual features of entities and/or more general forms of semantic combination. The current fMRI study was designed to refine hypotheses about the angular gyrus processes in question. In particular, we ask whether the AG supports the computation of argument structure (a linguistic notion that depends on a verb taking other phrases as arguments) or the computation of event concepts more broadly. To distinguish these possibilities we used a novel, lexically-matched contrast: noun phrases (NP) (the frightened boy) and verb phrases (VP) (frightened the boy), where VPs contained argument structure, denoting an event and assigning a thematic role to its argument, and NPs did not, denoting only a semantically enriched entity. Results showed that while many regions showed increased activity for NPs and VPs relative to unstructured word lists (AG, ATL, pSTS, anterior IFG), replicating evidence of their involvement in combinatorial processing, neither AG or ATL showed differences in activation between the VP and NP conditions. These results suggest that increased AG activity does not reflect the computation of argument structure per se, but are compatible with a view in which the AG represents event information denoted by words such as frightened independent of their grammatical context. By contrast, pSTS and posterior IFG did show increased activation for the VPs relative to NPs. We suggest that these effects may reflect differences in syntactic processing and working memory engaged by different structural relations.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angular gyrus; Argument structure; Semantics; Syntax; Thematic relations; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30735675     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  7 in total

1.  Altered Default Mode Network Functional Connectivity in Parkinson's Disease: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Ting Huang; Di Ma; Yu-Chen Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.152

2.  Differential contributions of left-hemispheric language regions to basic semantic composition.

Authors:  Emiliano Zaccarella; Gesa Hartwigsen; Astrid Graessner
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Lists with and without Syntax: A New Approach to Measuring the Neural Processing of Syntax.

Authors:  Ryan Law; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Syntax-Sensitive Regions of the Posterior Inferior Frontal Gyrus and the Posterior Temporal Lobe Are Differentially Recruited by Production and Perception.

Authors:  William Matchin; Emily Wood
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-07-01

5.  Dissociation between frontal and temporal-parietal contributions to connected speech in acute stroke.

Authors:  Junhua Ding; Randi C Martin; A Cris Hamilton; Tatiana T Schnur
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Disentangling Semantic Composition and Semantic Association in the Left Temporal Lobe.

Authors:  Jixing Li; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The role of left angular gyrus in the representation of linguistic composition relations.

Authors:  Wenjia Zhang; Ming Xiang; Suiping Wang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 5.038

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.