Rachel Herman1, Louise-Anne McNutt2, Mehek Mehta3, Daniel A Salmon4, Robert A Bednarczyk5, Jana Shaw6. 1. a Tufts University , Medford , MA , USA. 2. b Institute for Health and the Environment, University at Albany, State University of New York , Albany, NY , USA. 3. c Golisano Children's Hospital, University of Rochester Medical University , Rochester , NY , USA. 4. d Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA. 5. e Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA. 6. f Department of Pediatrics, SUNY Upstate Medical University , Syracuse , NY , USA.
Abstract
Background: To assess the knowledge and attitudes of middle school students toward vaccination, we measured their understanding of vaccine safety and effectiveness, expectations for communication with heath care providers, and their desired role in the vaccination decision-making process. Methods: A cross-sectional, self-administered survey was conducted among seventh and eighth grade students in a middle school in Upstate New York. Bivariate analyses were conducted to identify differences in perspective by gender, grade, and attitudes toward vaccination. Results: Of 346 students attending class, 336 (97.1%) participated. The majority of respondents were White (71.3%) and 11 to 13 years of age (78.2%). Boys were significantly more likely than girls to perceive vaccines to be very safe (48.4% vs 30.2%, p < 0.01) and very effective (49.7% vs 29.0%, p < 0.01). Approximately one-third of adolescents reported having a say in the decision to be vaccinated and a quarter of students expressed a desire for specific information about vaccines. Conclusions: This study found that young adolescents in a nonurban area of Upstate New York were generally marginalized in the vaccine decision-making process yet third of them indicated an interest in how vaccines work and a desire to participate in healthcare decisions. Interventions to improve vaccine uptake among adolescents should capitalize on this desire to understand vaccine safety, effectiveness and mechanism of action.
Background: To assess the knowledge and attitudes of middle school students toward vaccination, we measured their understanding of vaccine safety and effectiveness, expectations for communication with heath care providers, and their desired role in the vaccination decision-making process. Methods: A cross-sectional, self-administered survey was conducted among seventh and eighth grade students in a middle school in Upstate New York. Bivariate analyses were conducted to identify differences in perspective by gender, grade, and attitudes toward vaccination. Results: Of 346 students attending class, 336 (97.1%) participated. The majority of respondents were White (71.3%) and 11 to 13 years of age (78.2%). Boys were significantly more likely than girls to perceive vaccines to be very safe (48.4% vs 30.2%, p < 0.01) and very effective (49.7% vs 29.0%, p < 0.01). Approximately one-third of adolescents reported having a say in the decision to be vaccinated and a quarter of students expressed a desire for specific information about vaccines. Conclusions: This study found that young adolescents in a nonurban area of Upstate New York were generally marginalized in the vaccine decision-making process yet third of them indicated an interest in how vaccines work and a desire to participate in healthcare decisions. Interventions to improve vaccine uptake among adolescents should capitalize on this desire to understand vaccine safety, effectiveness and mechanism of action.
Authors: Paul L Reiter; Brenda Stubbs; Catherine A Panozzo; Dianne Whitesell; Noel T Brewer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Noel T Brewer; Megan E Hall; Teri L Malo; Melissa B Gilkey; Beth Quinn; Christine Lathren Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Laura A Shay; Austin S Baldwin; Andrea C Betts; Emily G Marks; Robin T Higashi; Richard L Street; Donna Persaud; Jasmin A Tiro Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Tanya L Kowalczyk Mullins; Anne M Griffioen; Susan Glynn; Gregory D Zimet; Susan L Rosenthal; J Dennis Fortenberry; Jessica A Kahn Journal: Vaccine Date: 2013-08-03 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Warner K Huh; Elmar A Joura; Anna R Giuliano; Ole-Erik Iversen; Rosires Pereira de Andrade; Kevin A Ault; Deborah Bartholomew; Ramon M Cestero; Edison N Fedrizzi; Angelica L Hirschberg; Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Angela Maria Ruiz-Sternberg; Jack T Stapleton; Dorothy J Wiley; Alex Ferenczy; Robert Kurman; Brigitte M Ronnett; Mark H Stoler; Jack Cuzick; Suzanne M Garland; Susanne K Kjaer; Oliver M Bautista; Richard Haupt; Erin Moeller; Michael Ritter; Christine C Roberts; Christine Shields; Alain Luxembourg Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jeffrey J VanWormer; Casper G Bendixsen; Elizabeth R Vickers; Shannon Stokley; Michael M McNeil; Julianne Gee; Edward A Belongia; Huong Q McLean Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Cecilia Trucchi; Daniela Amicizia; Silvio Tafuri; Laura Sticchi; Paolo Durando; Claudio Costantino; Federica Varlese; Bruno Di Silverio; Anna Maria Bagnasco; Filippo Ansaldi; Giancarlo Icardi Journal: Vaccines (Basel) Date: 2020-02-07
Authors: Cristyn Davies; Helen S Marshall; Gregory Zimet; Kirsten McCaffery; Julia M L Brotherton; Melissa Kang; Suzanne Garland; John Kaldor; Kevin McGeechan; S Rachel Skinner Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-11-01