Literature DB >> 30734661

Comparison of Stromal Vascular Fraction and Passaged Adipose-Derived Stromal/Stem Cells as Point-of-Care Agents for Bone Regeneration.

Ethan Nyberg1,2, Ashley Farris1,2, Aine O'Sullivan1,2, Ricardo Rodriguez3, Warren Grayson1,2,4,5.   

Abstract

Large craniofacial bone defects remain a clinical challenge due to their complex shapes and large volumes. Stem cell-based technologies that deliver osteogenic stem cells have shown remarkable regenerative potential but are hampered by the need for extensive in vitro manipulation before implantation. To address this, we explored the bone forming potential of the clinically relevant stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells obtained from human lipoaspirate. SVF cells can be isolated for acute use in the operating room and contain a subpopulation of adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASCs) that can develop mineralized tissue. ASCs can be purified from the more heterogeneous population of SVF cells via secondary and tertiary culture on tissue culture plastic. In this study, the relative potential for using SVF cells or passaged ASCs to induce robust bone regeneration was compared. Isogenic SVF and ASCs were suspended in fibrin hydrogels and seeded in three-dimensional-printed osteoinductive scaffolds of decellularized bone matrix and polycaprolactone. In vitro, both cell populations successfully mineralized the scaffold, demonstrating the robust bone formation properties of SVF. In murine critical-sized cranial defects, ASC-loaded scaffolds had greater (but not statistically significant) bone volume and bone coverage area than SVF-loaded scaffolds. However, both cell-laden interventions resulted in significantly greater bone healing than contralateral acellular controls. In conclusion, we observed substantial in vitro mineralization and robust in vivo bone regeneration in tissue-engineered bone grafts using both SVF and passaged ASCs. Impact Statement The inability to effectively regenerate bone within critical-sized craniofacial defects is a present clinical challenge and overcoming this limitation using tissue engineering strategies would significantly advance current treatment outcomes. The present study tests the feasibility of harvesting stem cells intraoperatively, combining them with three-dimensional (3D)-printed osteoinductive scaffolds and, without culturing in vitro, implanting them into the bone defect to stimulate regeneration. The data from this study demonstrated that SVF isolated from lipoaspirate and used in vivo with minimal processing could be combined with a 3D-printed bioactive material in a point-of-care approach to promote bone regeneration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; adipose-derived stromal/stem cells; bone tissue engineering; osseointegration; stromal vascular fraction

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30734661     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2018.0341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   4.080


  8 in total

1.  3D-printed oxygen-releasing scaffolds improve bone regeneration in mice.

Authors:  Ashley L Farris; Dennis Lambrechts; Yuxiao Zhou; Nicholas Y Zhang; Naboneeta Sarkar; Megan C Moorer; Alexandra N Rindone; Ethan L Nyberg; Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja; S J Burris; Kendall Free; Timothy F Witham; Ryan C Riddle; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 15.304

2.  Non-viral gene delivery of HIF-1α promotes angiogenesis in human adipose-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Savannah E Est-Witte; Ashley L Farris; Stephany Y Tzeng; Daphne L Hutton; Dennis H Gong; Kaitlyn G Calabresi; Warren L Grayson; Jordan J Green
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 10.633

3.  Isolation of adipose tissue derived regenerative cells from human subcutaneous tissue with or without the use of an enzymatic reagent.

Authors:  Glenn E Winnier; Nick Valenzuela; Jennifer Peters-Hall; Joshua Kellner; Christopher Alt; Eckhard U Alt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of UA-ADRCs (Uncultured, Autologous, Fresh, Unmodified, Adipose Derived Regenerative Cells, Isolated at Point of Care) in Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Eckhard U Alt; Glenn Winnier; Alexander Haenel; Ralf Rothoerl; Oender Solakoglu; Christopher Alt; Christoph Schmitz
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Osteogenic Induction with Silicon Hydroxyapatite Using Modified Autologous Adipose Tissue-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction: In Vitro and Qualitative Histomorphometric Analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Marghoob Khan; Shadab Ahmed Butt; Aqif Anwar Chaudhry; Amir Rashid; Kashif Ijaz; Asifa Majeed; Hashmat Gul
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  The Effect of Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Adipose Tissue Derived Stem Cells, and Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction on the Repair of Acute Anal Sphincter Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Wenbin Chen; Zijian He; Shuyu Li; Zixin Wu; Jin Tan; Weifeng Yang; Guanwei Li; Xiaoting Pan; Yuying Liu; Feng-Juan Lyu; Wanglin Li
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-15

7.  Clinical applications of adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction in veterinary practice.

Authors:  Khan Sharun; Kaveri Jambagi; Rohit Kumar; Mudasir Bashir Gugjoo; Abhijit M Pawde; Hardeep Singh Tuli; Kuldeep Dhama
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Why and how to use the body's own stem cells for regeneration in musculoskeletal disorders: a primer.

Authors:  John P Furia; Mark A Lundeen; Jason L Hurd; David A Pearce; Christopher Alt; Eckhard U Alt; Christoph Schmitz; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.