Literature DB >> 30734598

A feature-based analysis identifies COL1A2 as a regulator in pancreatic cancer.

Jie Wu1, Jing Liu2, XiaoQing Wei1, Qi Yu1, XiangHuan Niu1, ShuHong Tang2, Lei Song1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to identify genetic biomarkers in pancreatic cancer (PC) and explore its function in PC via a feature-base analysis of bioinformatics. OMIM and DisGeNET databases discovered 209 PC connected genes and then 516 connected genes were identified. We selected 29 genes according to optimal features and chose COL1A2, which had the highest expression, for the following experiment. The expression of COL1A2 was determined by qRT-PCR; cell proliferation was determined by MTT assay; migration and invasion after COL1A2 and miR-25-3p transfection was evaluated by Transwell assay. COL1A2 presented the highest expression in PC tissues, which was validated in functional experiments. MiR-25-3p suppressed the expression of COL1A2 in cell lines and inhibited migration, invasion and proliferation of PC cells. MiR-25-3p could suppress the expression of COL1A2 and inhibit the proliferation, migration and invasion of PC cells which provided a new idea for the detection and treatment of PC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COL1A2; MiR-25-3p; Pancreatic cancer; bioinformatics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30734598      PMCID: PMC6327995          DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2018.1484734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem        ISSN: 1475-6366            Impact factor:   5.051


Introduction

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most common malignancies in the world, with high mortality rates,. In recent years, the incidence of PC has gradually increased, and its 5-year relative survival rate is only 5%,, which leads to an urgent demand for new horizons. The occurrence of PC is usually associated with a variety of factors, such as genetic factors, environmental factors and living habits. Moreover, PC cells are characterised by tumour infiltration and susceptibility to systemic diffusion, which makes molecular biology study insufficient. Thus, more investigations for the mechanism of PC tumorigenesis are warranted. Gene ontology (GO) could be classified according to its molecular function, biological pathways and cell localisation. Through the analysis of GO enrichment, it is beneficial to overall grasp the function of differentially expressed genes in specific diseases. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) is a database based on the known molecular interaction network, which helps to observe the biological pathways and functional characteristics of mutant genes through the enrichment score of mapping network. In the process of tumorigenesis, it is often accompanied by the abnormal expression or variation of genes, which lead to turbulence in signalling pathways, as well as complex regulatory networks. Therefore, GO and KEGG analyses were adopted for the encoding genes, which was conducive to regulatory network speculation and the feature genes prediction. In this study, a systematic biological method was used to collect PC-related genes recorded in the disease-gene relevance databases, then GO and KEGG were adopted for PC-related genes and non-related genes. Classification and optimal feature extraction by machine learning were used to identify GO and KEGG pathway features for predicting PC-related genes, which helped us identify PC-related gene COL1A2 that encodes type I collagen at the autosomal 7q22.1 locus with a total length of 38 kb and 52 exons. Nowadays, putative mutant genes in PC reported including KRAS, CDKN2A, TP53 and SMAD4. At present, it is reported that COL1A2 involves in the regulation of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, osteoarthritis and so on. Furthermore, some researchers reported that COL1A2 might directly play a role in pancreatic cancer proliferation, migration, invasion and in vivo xenograft progression, through its interaction with microRNA (miRNA). MiRNA, a kind of single-stranded noncoding RNA, has been widely investigated in cancer researches due to its wide range of target genes regulation. Particularly, it plays a key role in the proliferation and migration of cancer cells and is commonly used as a potential target for cancer therapy. It has been reported that miR-25–3p was highly expressed in colon cancer, gastric cancer, prostate cancer and ovarian cancer, and involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis and migration,. However, the association between miR-25–3p and COL1A2 as well as their roles in PC has not been clearly elucidated. Here, the features of PC-related genes were analysed and new genetic biomarkers were predicted by machine learning. Our study explored the role of COL1A2 in PC cells and the association between COL1A2 and miR-25–3p in vitro. The findings may shed light on the diagnosis and treatment of PC.

Materials and methods

Selection of optimal features and prediction of PC-related genes

The features of PC-related genes were defined based on Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) and DisGeNET databases, then each gene was ranked according to the enrichment score of GO and involved KEGG pathways. The higher the score was, the more reliable the function definition would be. Optimal features of PC-related genes screening and gene prediction were conducted based on the machine learning methods of minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR), incremental feature selection (IFS) and Random Forest algorithm (RFA). Specifically, the screening features were sorted using mRMR based on two criteria: Max-Relevance (MaxRel) and Min-Redundancy (mRed). In the process of IFS, we added features according to the order of the mRMR list. After adding a new feature, a new sub-data set of positive and negative samples would be built accordingly. Then each sub-data set was examined and evaluated to confirm the optimal one, which contained the optimal feature. Classification analysis of RFA was performed by Weka 3.6.4 software, using default parameter and being estimated by Ten-fold cross validation. The test performance evaluation was assessed by Matthews’s correlation coefficient (MCC) to obtain a sub-data set with maximum MCC value, which contained the optimal feature set. Based on that, all human genes could be classified by RFA. For each gene, it would be divided into related and non-related genomes.

Gene expression microarray validation

Predicted PC-related genes were validated via two datasets (GSE15471 and GSE28735) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). In GSE15471, 36 pairs of normal and tumour tissue samples were obtained at the time of surgery from resected pancreas of 36 pancreatic cancer patients. Gene expression was analysed on Affymetrix U133 plus 2.0 whole genome microarrays. The microarray data were subsequently normalised using the Robust Multi-array Average (RMA) algorithm. In GSE28735, the profile compared the microarray gene-expression profiles of 45 matching pairs of pancreatic tumour and adjacent non-tumour tissues with the platform of Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST Array. Analysis of gene differential expression was used by R package of Limma following by the filtration criteria were: Log2 (Fold Change) > 2 and p < .05.

Clinical samples

Fifteen PC patients were selected for clinical participants. The tumours were graded in line with the criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO, 2008). Fifteen pairs of tumour tissues with matched adjacent normal tissues were obtained. All experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, and informed consents were obtained from all the participating patients. All the tissues were stored in liquid nitrogen at –80 °C for the following experiments.

Cell lines

Human PC cell lines PANC-1, CAPAN-1, SW1990, JF305 and benign cell line HPC-Y5 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). HPC-Y5 cells were selected as controls. Each cell line was inoculated into Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) containing 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS; Sijiqing Biochemical, Hangzhou, China) at 37 °C in an incubator with 5% CO2.

Plasmid construction and transfection

Using siRNA to interfere with COL1A2 gene transcription, the siRNA for specifically knocking down COL1A2 was transferred into shRNA which was inserted into pSilencer2.1-U6 neo vectors (Ambion, Austin, TX) at the BamHI and HindIII cleavage sites. The pcDNA 3.1-neo vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) were used to constructed COL1A2 overexpression vector with sites of HindIII and EcoRV. MiR-25–3p (5′-CAU UGC ACU UGU CUC GGU CUG A-3′) mimics and inhibitor were commercially synthesised by Thermo Fisher Scientific. Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen Inc, Carlsbad, CA) was adopted for plasmid transfection in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from PC cells in strict accordance with the instruction of TRIzol Reagent Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Total RNA (5 µg) was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using specific primer M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega Corp, Madison, WI). Taking cDNA as template, PCR amplification was carried out by qRT-PCR for quantitative determination. The PCR procedure was set as follows: 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s. The formula for calculating gene expression is 2–ΔΔCt. The gene expression levels were relative to the untreated cells. U6 snRNA or GAPDH mRNA was served as control for miRNA or mRNA respectively.

RNA pull-down assay

Biotinylated miR-25–3p pull-down assay was performed. The pancreatic cancer cells were transfected with biotinylated miR-25–3p or the NC and were harvested after 48 h transfection. The cells were washed with PBS and incubated in a lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.05% Igepal, 60 U Superase-In/ml (Ambion), 1 mM DTT, protease inhibitors (Roche) on ice for 10 min. Fifty microlitre of the sample was aliquoted for input. Simultaneously, Streptavidin-Dyna beads (Invitrogen, CA) incubated with remaining lysates. The beads were incubated at 4 °C for 3 h, there times with the low salt buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH8.0 and 150 mM NaCl) and once with the high salt buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 500 mM NaCl). The bound RNA was then precipitated using Trizol and then applied in the q-RT-PCR analysis for COL1A2 mRNA enrichment.

MTT assay

MTT was performed to detect cell proliferation. PC cells were seeded into 96-well and cultured for 12 h before transfection. After transfection with 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 96 h, the plates were taken out at the corresponding time point with each well added 20 µl MTT (5 mg/ml) and incubated for an additional 4 h. After the clear liquid was carefully aspirated, 200 µl dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to each well, incubated at 37 °C for 10 min or oscillated for 10 min until the blue-violet crystals were completely dissolved. The absorbance of each well was measured at 570 nm via a microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT) and then the cell growth curve was drawn.

Transwell assay

Transwell chamber (Corning Costar, NY) was used to perform migrative or invasive assay. Cells of 1 × 105 were seeded into the upper chambers with serum-free. The lower chambers were added with DMEM containing 10% FBS. After being incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 24 h transfection, the cells were fixed 15 min with methanol, stained 15 min with 0.05% crystal violet in PBS and counted under a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). After migration or invasion, cells in upper chamber were wiped with cotton swabs carefully and fixed with PBS containing 4% formaldehyde and subsequently immersed in a 2% ethanol solution containing 1% crystal violet. An optical microscope (100×) was used to observe and take photographs for cells. For invasion detection, Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) was added to the upper chamber of Transwell.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done by GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad, La Jolla, MA). The measurement data were represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student’s t test was applied for two-group comparison, while one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was adopted for the comparison of multi-groups. p < .05 was expressed when the mean difference was statistically significant.

Results

Optimal features of PC-related genes and gene prediction

According to Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database, 200 genes were found to be connected with PC. We also identified 12 PC-related genes in DisGeNET database. Excluding repeating ones, a total of 209 genes were selected for further investigation as shown in Supplementary Table S1. All these 209 genes were taken as a positive sample group and the genes randomly selected from other human genes were used as a negative sample group. The latter was divided into 10 parts to keep the balance of gene numbers in positive samples and negative samples. Subsequently, 10 positive and negative sample datasets named dataset 1 to dataset 10 were constructed in the way of combining 10 negative samples with positive samples. For each dataset, the correlation of each feature with positive and negative samples was calculated. The features with a correlation below 0.1 were removed, and the rest were retained for the next round of optimal feature screening and optimal feature selection. The number of residual features, the corresponding optimal features and the accuracy of machine learning as well as MCC value in each dataset was shown in Table 1.
Table 1.

Performance of prediction based on the screened optimal features.

DatasetResidual features numberOptimal feature numberSensitivitySpecificityAccuracyMCC
1392411210.940.90.920.84
232994550.970.820.910.81
3342716790.940.930.930.86
4364411960.901.000.940.88
537682190.970.710.870.73
639486020.900.900.900.8
740093860.870.90.880.77
8450613130.940.940.940.86
942103760.970.710.870.73
1048286701.oo0.710.950.82

MCC: Matthews’s correlation coefficient.

Performance of prediction based on the screened optimal features. MCC: Matthews’s correlation coefficient. The features that appeared in the optimal features of at least 6 datasets were selected as the overall optimal features, which were enriched 2175 GO terms and 79 KEGG pathways (Supplementary Table S2). The results of GO enrichment were presented in three categories, including biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions, as shown in Figure 1. According to the overall optimal features, PC-related genes were further predicted by RFA. Through the classification of RFA, 516 PC-related genes were finally predicted (Supplementary Table S3).
Figure 1.

Gene Ontology (GO) for optimal features of PC-related genes. GO enrichment were presented in three categories, including biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions.

Gene Ontology (GO) for optimal features of PC-related genes. GO enrichment were presented in three categories, including biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions.

Validation of predicted PC related genes in GEO datasets

Two GEO microarray datasets (GSE15471 and GSE28735) were used to certify the associations of the 516 PC-related genes with PC. Using the 516 PC-related genes as features of PC, samples were classified by RFA, and then, the classification accuracy of this gene set was obtained for differentiating PC samples from normal controls. These PC-related genes were further optimised by feature selection method as mentioned above to obtain an optimised gene set with 29 genes, when the accuracy of classification would be 96%. As shown in Figure 2, COL1A2 presented consistently higher expression in two GEO datasets, compared with normal samples. Hence, the role of COL1A2 in PC was worthy to be further verified in vitro.
Figure 2.

Validation of predicted PC related genes in GEO datasets. COL1A2 presented a significantly high expression in PC tissues among 29 genes screened by machine learning in GSE15417 (A) and GSE28735 (B) datasets. *, p < .05; **, p < .01.

Validation of predicted PC related genes in GEO datasets. COL1A2 presented a significantly high expression in PC tissues among 29 genes screened by machine learning in GSE15417 (A) and GSE28735 (B) datasets. *, p < .05; **, p < .01.

COL1A2 expression was elevated in PC tissues and cells

The expression of COL1A2 was verified in 15 pairs of PC tissues and normal adjacent tissues, which showed that COL1A2 was highly expressed in PC tissues (Figure 3(A)). In addition, high expression of COL1A2 was also confirmed in four PC cell lines compared with benign cell line HPC-Y5 (Figure 3(B)). Expression of COL1A2 in PANC-1 and SW1990 cell lines presented the highest level and they were selected for further experiments.
Figure 3.

COL1A2 expression was elevated in PC tissues and cells. (A) COL1A2 was highly expressed in PC tissues in 15 patients compared with normal adjacent tissues. (B) COL1A2 was highly expressed in four PC cell lines compared with benign cell line HPC-Y5. *, p < .05; **, p < .01; ***, p < .001.

COL1A2 expression was elevated in PC tissues and cells. (A) COL1A2 was highly expressed in PC tissues in 15 patients compared with normal adjacent tissues. (B) COL1A2 was highly expressed in four PC cell lines compared with benign cell line HPC-Y5. *, p < .05; **, p < .01; ***, p < .001.

Effect of COL1A2 inhibition on the proliferation, migration and invasion of PC cells

Plasmid si-COL1A2 was transfected into PANC-1 and SW1990 cell lines in order to study the mechanism of COL1A2 in PC. Taking si-NC as a control, the expression of COL1A2 mRNA was detected by qRT-PCR. The result manifested that the expression of COL1A2 mRNA in PANC-1 and SW1990 cell lines transfected with si-COL1A2 was significantly lower than that in si-NC group (Figure 4(A)). In addition, MTT assay verified that cell proliferation was significantly suppressed in si-COL1A2 group after 24 h (Figure 4(B)). At the same time, the invasion and migration of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells transfected with si-COL1A2 were analysed by Transwell (Figure 4(C)). In PANC-1 and SW1990 cells transfected with si-COL1A2, the number of migrated and invaded cells decreased significantly compared with the control group transfected with si-NC. The above results indicated that COL1A2 silencing could inhibit cell proliferation, migration and invasion of PC cells.
Figure 4.

COL1A2 silencing could inhibit cell proliferation, migration and invasion of PC cells. (A) Expression of COL1A2 mRNA in PANC-1 and SW1990 cell lines transfected with si-COL1A2 was significantly lower than that in the si-NC group. (B) MTT assay verified that cell proliferation was significantly suppressed in si-COL1A2 group after 24h. (C) Transwell assay indicated the number of migrated and invaded cells in PANC-1 and SW1990 cells transfected with si-COL1A2 decreased significantly compared with the control group transfected with si-NC. *, p < .05.

COL1A2 silencing could inhibit cell proliferation, migration and invasion of PC cells. (A) Expression of COL1A2 mRNA in PANC-1 and SW1990 cell lines transfected with si-COL1A2 was significantly lower than that in the si-NC group. (B) MTT assay verified that cell proliferation was significantly suppressed in si-COL1A2 group after 24h. (C) Transwell assay indicated the number of migrated and invaded cells in PANC-1 and SW1990 cells transfected with si-COL1A2 decreased significantly compared with the control group transfected with si-NC. *, p < .05.

MiR-25–3p down-regulated COL1A2 expression

TargetScan identified miR-25–3p could directly bind to 3′UTR of COL1A2. In both PANC-1 and SW1990 cells lines, COL1A2 expression was regulated by miR-25–3p mimics and miR-25–3p inhibitor transfection (Figure 5(A,B)). The result demonstrated that miR-25–3p could down-regulated the expression of COL1A2, and they were negatively correlated. The relationship between COL1A2 and miR-25–3p was further confirmed by RNA pull-down assay. The result suggested that COL1A2 in PANC-1 and SW1990 cell lines could be significantly enriched by miR-25–3p (Figure 5(C)), which implied that that COL1A2 is the target gene for miR-25–3p.
Figure 5.

MiR-25–3p down-regulated COL1A2 expression. (A) MiR-25–3p mimics inhibited the expression of COL1A2. (B) MiR-25–3p inhibitor enhanced the expression of COL1A2. (C) RNA pull-down assay showed that COL1A2 was higher in the miR-25–3p probe group than in the NC group. *, p < .05.

MiR-25–3p down-regulated COL1A2 expression. (A) MiR-25–3p mimics inhibited the expression of COL1A2. (B) MiR-25–3p inhibitor enhanced the expression of COL1A2. (C) RNA pull-down assay showed that COL1A2 was higher in the miR-25–3p probe group than in the NC group. *, p < .05.

Interaction between miR-25–3p and COL1A2 in PC cells

To further verify the interaction between COL1A2 and miR-25–3p in PC cells, PANC-1 and SW1990 cells were transfected with pcDNA 3.1-neo vectors (NC), pcDNA 3.1-COL1A2, miR-25–3p mimics and miR-25–3p mimics + pcDNA 3.1-COL1A2 (mix). The results of qRT-PCR showed that COL1A2 expression was elevated in pcDNA 3.1-COL1A2 group and COL1A2 expression reduced in miR-25–3p mimics group (Figure 6(A)). In addition, miR-25–3p mimics could reverse the effect of pcDNA 3.1-COL1A2 on COL1A2 expression. Similarly, proliferation of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells was promoted in pcDNA 3.1-COL1A2 group and suppressed in miR-25–3p mimics group (Figure 6(B,C)), with counterbalanced effect in mix group. At last, Transwell assay suggested inhibited migration and invasion in miR-25–3p mimics group and enhanced migration in pcDNA 3.1-COL1A2 group. The promoting effect on migration and invasion of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells by pcDNA 3.1-COL1A2 plasmid transfection was counteracted after the co-transfection of miR-25–3p mimics (Figure 6(D,E)).
Figure 6.

Interaction between miR-25–3p and COL1A2 in PC cells. (A) COL1A2 expression was detected by qRT-PCR in four groups, including PANC-1 and SW1990 cells were transfected with pcDNA 3.1-neo vectors (NC), pcDNA 3.1-COL1A2, miR-25–3p mimics and miR-25–3p mimics + pcDNA 3.1-COL1A2 (mix). (B-C) MTT assay was applied to detect the proliferation of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells in four groups. (D-E) Transwell assay was used for the detection of migration and invasion in PANC-1 and SW1990 cells. *p < .05 indicated significant differences compared with NC groups or mix groups. *, p < .05; **, p < .01.

Interaction between miR-25–3p and COL1A2 in PC cells. (A) COL1A2 expression was detected by qRT-PCR in four groups, including PANC-1 and SW1990 cells were transfected with pcDNA 3.1-neo vectors (NC), pcDNA 3.1-COL1A2, miR-25–3p mimics and miR-25–3p mimics + pcDNA 3.1-COL1A2 (mix). (B-C) MTT assay was applied to detect the proliferation of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells in four groups. (D-E) Transwell assay was used for the detection of migration and invasion in PANC-1 and SW1990 cells. *p < .05 indicated significant differences compared with NC groups or mix groups. *, p < .05; **, p < .01.

Discussion

This study hypothesised COL1A2 as a significant regulator in PC after the combined selection of OMIM/DisGeNET databases, GO/KEGG analyses and machine learning model constructed by algorithm. Its suppressor role was validated in functional experiments by miR-25–3p overexpression, which resulted in inhibition in cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Systematic biology is widely used to reveal the regulation mechanism of oncogene and the interaction of cancer proteins from a holistic perspective by multidisciplinary approach. In this paper, based on the confirmed reports, GO and KEGG pathway were combined to investigate 2175 GO terms and 79 KEGG pathway that were highly associated with the development of PC. Machine learning model in bioinformatics might not only integrate information about PC genes from the collected large data but also show consistency between the predicted feature genes by algorithm and the reported cancer-related genes, which also supported the accuracy of bioinformatics in predicting oncogenes. This study may provide new ideas in future clinical research about PC development. Among the screened optimal feature genes in PC, there were many known PC-related genes, and these predicted feature genes would coincide with many reported results. Many genes such as BUB1, FOXC1, STAT5B and VEGFA were found to be correlated to the development of PC, but the mechanism was not clear. For example, the predicted signal transducer and activator of transcription 5b (STAT5B) gene could significantly inhibit the growth, angiogenesis and metastasis of PC, which was thought to be a novel molecular target for PC. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A (VEGFA) has long been considered as an important factor in the growth and spread of PC. Other genes such as budding uninhibited by Benomyl (BUB1) were important components of the spindle pole body. Hempen found that BUB1 in PC cells had double missense variation, which affected the development of its tumour cells. Moreover, the predicted Forkhead box C1 (FOXC1) gene is an important oncogene of basal-like breast cancer (BLBC). The role of some genes in PC such as COL1A2 in this paper has not been reported, but its role in the development of other cancers remains to be discovered. Studies have found that PIK3CA, RAS (KRAS, NRAS) and BRAF gene mutations could activate PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAS/RAF/MEK pathways, thereby enhancing the proliferation and migration of PC cells. As target genes of miR-25–3p, these PC oncogenes play a significant role in the development of PC, which also indicate that miR-25–3p is of great importance in the early drive, proliferation and migration of PC and the effect may be caused by multiple target genes. Studies have found that miR-25–3p could suppress COL1A2 and influence the proliferation and migration of PC cells. Furthermore, the expression of COL1A2 gene was negatively associated with the transcription level of miR-25–3p, which was similar to the result that NEAT1 affected the growth and invasion of PC cells reported by Cao et al. Therefore, we assumed that the effect of COL1A2 on PC cells may be similar to that of NEAT1. That is, over-expressed genes antagonised the interaction with miR-25–3p, thereby reducing downstream PC oncogenes expression and further promoted the proliferation and migration of PC cells. Limitations shall be attended in this study as well. COL1A2, a biomarker in blood, could affect cancer progression in multiple ways, which remains to be discovered in future researches. Besides, the underlying mechanism of COL1A2 and miR-25–3p co-function needs further investigation. Turbulence in cancer metastasis including epigenetic modifications, metabolic changes, locus mutations and micro-environment changes could be investigated in future studies. In conclusion, machine learning as well as databases selected COL1A2 as a PC-related gene. COL1A2 was high expressed in cancer tissues. MiR-25–3p would suppress COL1A2 expression and inhibit the proliferation, migration and invasion, which provided ideas for mechanism studies and clinical trials.
  29 in total

1.  A double missense variation of the BUB1 gene and a defective mitotic spindle checkpoint in the pancreatic cancer cell line Hs766T.

Authors:  Paula M Hempen; Harsha Kurpad; Eric S Calhoun; Susan Abraham; Scott E Kern
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.878

2.  Type I collagen promotes the malignant phenotype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Armstrong; Graham Packham; Lindsay B Murphy; Adrian C Bateman; John A Conti; David R Fine; Colin D Johnson; R Christopher Benyon; John P Iredale
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Systems biology and new technologies enable predictive and preventative medicine.

Authors:  Leroy Hood; James R Heath; Michael E Phelps; Biaoyang Lin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Collagen I promotes metastasis in pancreatic cancer by activating c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase 1 and up-regulating N-cadherin expression.

Authors:  Yasushi Shintani; Michael A Hollingsworth; Margaret J Wheelock; Keith R Johnson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  MicroRNA-25 functions as a potential tumor suppressor in colon cancer by targeting Smad7.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Chaoxia Zou; Chendan Zou; Zhongjing Han; Haifeng Xiao; Huiyan Wei; Wei Wang; Lei Zhang; Xueying Zhang; Qingchao Tang; Chunjing Zhang; Ji Tao; Xishan Wang; Xu Gao
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  STAT5b as molecular target in pancreatic cancer--inhibition of tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastases.

Authors:  Christian Moser; Petra Ruemmele; Sebastian Gehmert; Hedwig Schenk; Marina P Kreutz; Maria E Mycielska; Christina Hackl; Alexander Kroemer; Andreas A Schnitzbauer; Oliver Stoeltzing; Hans J Schlitt; Edward K Geissler; Sven A Lang
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Chenwei Li; David G Heidt; Piero Dalerba; Charles F Burant; Lanjing Zhang; Volkan Adsay; Max Wicha; Michael F Clarke; Diane M Simeone
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Discovering cancer genes by integrating network and functional properties.

Authors:  Li Li; Kangyu Zhang; James Lee; Shaun Cordes; David P Davis; Zhijun Tang
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  PIK3CA mutations frequently coexist with RAS and BRAF mutations in patients with advanced cancers.

Authors:  Filip Janku; J Jack Lee; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David S Hong; Aung Naing; Gerald S Falchook; Siqing Fu; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Design and construction of two yeast shuttle vectors containing human procollagen genes expression cassette for expression in yeast.

Authors:  Baharak Abdemami; Mohammad Ali Shokrgozar; Hossein Khanahmad Shahreza; Mehdi Ghavami
Journal:  Avicenna J Med Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis and Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Related Pain.

Authors:  Ines Lohse; Shaun P Brothers
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Identification and analysis of genes associated with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by integrated bioinformatics methods.

Authors:  Yu Jin; Ya Yang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.183

3.  Identification of hub genes and construction of transcriptional regulatory network for the progression of colon adenocarcinoma hub genes and TF regulatory network of colon adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shuxun Wei; Jinshui Chen; Yu Huang; Qiang Sun; Haolu Wang; Xiaowen Liang; Zhiqian Hu; Xinxing Li
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  miR-939-5p Contributes to the Migration and Invasion of Pancreatic Cancer by Targeting ARHGAP4.

Authors:  Yehua Shen; Gang Chen; Huifeng Gao; Ye Li; Liping Zhuang; Zhiqiang Meng; Luming Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  High expression of collagen 1A2 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of esophageal cancer cells.

Authors:  Guangbin Li; Wei Jiang; Yunteng Kang; Xiaojun Yu; Chengpeng Zhang; Yu Feng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12

6.  Bioinformatic Identification of Potential Hub Genes in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Changgang Guo; Ting Shao; Dadong Wei; Chunsheng Li; Fengjun Liu; Minghui Li; Zhiming Gao; Guochang Bao
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  LncRNA LIFR-AS1 promotes proliferation and invasion of gastric cancer cell via miR-29a-3p/COL1A2 axis.

Authors:  Haiyan Pan; Yuanlin Ding; Yugang Jiang; Xingjie Wang; Jiawei Rao; Xingshan Zhang; Haibing Yu; Qinghua Hou; Tao Li
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.722

8.  Peptide Signatures for Prognostic Markers of Pancreatic Cancer by MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging.

Authors:  Florian N Loch; Oliver Klein; Katharina Beyer; Frederick Klauschen; Christian Schineis; Johannes C Lauscher; Georgios A Margonis; Claudius E Degro; Wael Rayya; Carsten Kamphues
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-12

9.  Integrated Analysis of lncRNA and mRNA Expression Profiles Indicates Age-Related Changes in Meniscus.

Authors:  Li-Ya Ai; Ming-Ze Du; You-Rong Chen; Peng-Yan Xia; Ji-Ying Zhang; Dong Jiang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-10

10.  Molecular features and vulnerabilities of recurrent chordomas.

Authors:  Carolin Seeling; André Lechel; Michael Svinarenko; Peter Möller; Thomas F E Barth; Kevin Mellert
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.