| Literature DB >> 30734507 |
Chao Zhang1,2, Huan Lin3, Rui Fu2, Tao Zhang2, Qiang Nie2, Song Dong2, Xue-Ning Yang2, Yi-Long Wu2, Wen-Zhao Zhong2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing identification of small pulmonary nodules promotes sublobar resection, but localization and surgical margins of non-palpable pulmonary nodules through sublobar resection are challenging. Our aim was explicate the feasibility of applying indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence to localized nodules, and to carry out surgical resection.Entities:
Keywords: Indocyanine green; non-small cell lung cancer; sublobar resection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30734507 PMCID: PMC6449268 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thorac Cancer ISSN: 1759-7706 Impact factor: 3.500
Figure 1Overview for patients’ characteristics and study outcome with visualized heat map. AAH, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia; AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; MIA, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma; IAC, invasive adenocarcinoma; GGO, ground‐glass opacity; LLL, left lower lobe; LUL, left upper lobe; Metastatic IC, metastatic lung tumor from colon cancer; mGGO, mixed ground‐glass opacity; RLL, right lower lobe; RML, right middle lobe; RUL, right upper lobe.
Figure 2(a–d) Intraoperative fluorescence using near‐infrared thoracoscope. Fluorescence merge image. (c) Slight diffusion of fluorescence, but (b) high concentration of indocyanine green was captured in the middle.
Figure 3Consecutive view before, during, and after the entire procedure. (a) Preoperative computed tomography scan showed pure ground‐glass nodule (yellow arrow) located in the right upper lobe with 6 mm in the longest diameters. (b) Intraoperative findings under near‐infrared thoracoscope. (c) This pattern showed the concentration of indocyanine green with red color indicating high concentration, and grey color indicating low concentration. (d) Gross appearance of the resected specimen. (e) Confirmation of fluorescence in resected specimen under near‐infrared thoracoscope. (f) Malignant nodule was found within the site with the highest concentration of indocyanine green.
Patients’ characteristics and detailed tumor parameters for both segmentectomy and wedge resection
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Patient characteristics and tumor parameters | Wedge resection | Segmentectomy |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 9 (25.8%) | 5 (45.5%) |
| Female | 26 (74.2%) | 6 (54.5) |
| Median age, years (range) | 55 (40–79) | 53.5 (40–77) |
| Median nodule size, mm (range) | 7 (3–20) | 8 (4–22) |
| Median depth of nodule from surface, mm (range) | 8.2 (1.1–38.1) | 10.5 (4.1–58) |
| Nodule location | ||
| Left upper lobe | 7 (20%) | 1 (9.1%) |
| Left lower lobe | 3 (8.6%) | 3 (27.3%) |
| Right upper lobe | 18 (51.4%) | 6 (54.5%) |
| Right middle lobe | 5 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) |
| Right lower lobe | 2 (5.7%) | 1 (9.1%) |
| Radiological pattern | ||
| Pure ground glass nodule | 21 (60%) | 6 (54.5%) |
| Part‐solid nodule | 11 (31.4%) | 4 (36.4%) |
| Solid nodule | 2 (5.7%) | 1 (9.1%) |
| Cystic nodule | 1 (2.9%) | 0 (0%) |
| Median distance from surgical margin to tumor, mm (range) | 4 (1–20) | 4 (3–26) |
| Pathological diagnosis | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 33 (94.2%) | 10 (90.9%) |
| Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia | 1 | 0 |
| Adenocarcinoma in situ | 12 | 1 |
| Minimally invasive adenocarcinoma | 7 | 3 |
| Lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma | 4 | 3 |
| Acinar predominant adenocarcinoma | 9 | 3 |
| Metastatic lung cancer | 1 (2.9%) | 0 (0%) |
| Benign disease | 1 (2.9%) | 1 (9.1%) |
Detailed information of lesion and surgery for segmentectomy
| Case | Age | Gender | Tumor location | CT findings | Tumor size | Depth from surface | Pathological resection margin | Pathologic diagnosis | ICG fluorescence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | M | LUL | Solid | 4 | 4.1 | 16 | AIS | Clear |
| 2 | 53 | M | LLL | GGO | 4 | 55 | 11 | MIA | Clear |
| 3 | 38 | F | RUL | mGGO | 5 | 25 | 18 | LPA | Clear |
| 4 | 60 | F | LUL | mGGO | 8 | 20.6 | 18 | LPA | Clear |
| 5 | 41 | M | RML | mGGO | 9 | 23.4 | 26 | LPA | Clear |
| 6 | 57 | F | RUL | GGO | 11 | 58 | 15 | APA | Clear |
| 7 | 40 | M | RML | GGO | 12 | 13.5 | 7 | Benign | Clear |
| 8 | 53 | F | RUL | GGO | 15 | 38.1 | 3 | MIA | Clear |
| 9 | 55 | M | LLL | GGO | 16 | 11.3 | 4 | APA | Clear |
| 10 | 55 | F | LUL | GGO | 18 | 9.8 | 5 | MIA | Clear |
| 11 | 77 | F | RUL | mGGO | 22 | 16.5 | 3 | APA | Clear |
AAH, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia; AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; APA, acinar predominant adenocarcinoma; CT, computed tomography; F, female; RUL, right upper lobe; GGO, ground‐glass opacity; IAC, invasive adenocarcinoma; ICG, indocyanine green; LLL, left lower lobe; LPA, lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma; LUL, left upper lobe; M, male; Metastatic IC, metastatic lung tumor from colon cancer; mGGO, mixed ground‐glass opacity; MIA, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma; RLL, right lower lobe; RML, right middle lobe.
Figure 4Verification of targeted vessels and segmental plain by injecting indocyanine green through the peripheral vein. (a) To ensure whether the artery (black arrow) belongs to S3, we used colored ribbon to ligate the artery before injecting indocyanine green. Both S2 and S3 received no dye. (b) When we loosened the ribbon, S3 received dye immediately, confirming the uncertain artery should be preserved. (c,d) Both segmental plains were clearly marked by indocyanine green fluorescence.