Literature DB >> 30734447

The dimensionality of stability depends on disturbance type.

Viktoriia Radchuk1, Frederik De Laender2, Juliano Sarmento Cabral3, Isabelle Boulangeat4,5, Michael Crawford6, Friedrich Bohn7,8, Jonathan De Raedt2,9, Cédric Scherer1, Jens-Christian Svenning4,10, Kirsten Thonicke11, Frank M Schurr12, Volker Grimm6,7,13, Stephanie Kramer-Schadt1,14.   

Abstract

Ecosystems respond in various ways to disturbances. Quantifying ecological stability therefore requires inspecting multiple stability properties, such as resistance, recovery, persistence and invariability. Correlations among these properties can reduce the dimensionality of stability, simplifying the study of environmental effects on ecosystems. A key question is how the kind of disturbance affects these correlations. We here investigated the effect of three disturbance types (random, species-specific, local) applied at four intensity levels, on the dimensionality of stability at the population and community level. We used previously parameterized models that represent five natural communities, varying in species richness and the number of trophic levels. We found that disturbance type but not intensity affected the dimensionality of stability and only at the population level. The dimensionality of stability also varied greatly among species and communities. Therefore, studying stability cannot be simplified to using a single metric and multi-dimensional assessments are still to be recommended.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community model; disturbance intensity; disturbance type; extinction; individual-based model; invariability; persistence; recovery; resistance

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30734447     DOI: 10.1111/ele.13226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  5 in total

1.  The ghost of disturbance past: long-term effects of pulse disturbances on community biomass and composition.

Authors:  Claire Jacquet; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Horizontal and vertical diversity jointly shape food web stability against small and large perturbations.

Authors:  Qinghua Zhao; Paul J Van den Brink; Camille Carpentier; Yingying X G Wang; Pablo Rodríguez-Sánchez; Chi Xu; Silke Vollbrecht; Frits Gillissen; Marlies Vollebregt; Shaopeng Wang; Frederik De Laender
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 3.  Tackling unresolved questions in forest ecology: The past and future role of simulation models.

Authors:  Isabelle Maréchaux; Fanny Langerwisch; Andreas Huth; Harald Bugmann; Xavier Morin; Christopher P O Reyer; Rupert Seidl; Alessio Collalti; Mateus Dantas de Paula; Rico Fischer; Martin Gutsch; Manfred J Lexer; Heike Lischke; Anja Rammig; Edna Rödig; Boris Sakschewski; Franziska Taubert; Kirsten Thonicke; Giorgio Vacchiano; Friedrich J Bohn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Quantifying the dynamics of rocky intertidal sessile communities along the Pacific coast of Japan: implications for ecological resilience.

Authors:  Ken Ishida; Michikusa Tachibana; Masakazu Hori; Takehiro Okuda; Tomoko Yamamoto; Masahiro Nakaoka; Takashi Noda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Life history mediates the trade-offs among different components of demographic resilience.

Authors:  Pol Capdevila; Iain Stott; James Cant; Maria Beger; Gwilym Rowlands; Molly Grace; Roberto Salguero-Gómez
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 11.274

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.