Literature DB >> 30734401

Examining item content validity using property fitting analysis via multidimensional scaling.

Cody Ding1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Multiple-item measuring instruments are frequently used in a wide range of disciplines for the purpose of research in substantive areas. The quality of items in these instruments determine to a large extent whether the results are trustworthy. In this paper, we suggested to use property fitting analysis to evaluate the appropriateness of items content validity based on explicit item property criteria.
METHODS: Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale as an example, item property fitting analyses via multidimensional scaling model was used to quantitatively evaluate the properties of items based on rating data from 12 counselors.
RESULTS: The results of the analyses indicated that using explicit item property criteria to select items for subsequent psychometric analyses improved the item quality in terms of reliability and factor structure.
CONCLUSIONS: Item property fitting analysis seemed to provide the researcher a viable quantitative method when evaluating item content validity.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  explicit item property criteria; item content validity; item property fitting analysis; multidimensional scaling

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30734401      PMCID: PMC6877182          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  18 in total

1.  Development and psychometric properties of the transformational teaching questionnaire.

Authors:  Mark R Beauchamp; Julian Barling; Zhen Li; Katie L Morton; Sharon E Keith; Bruno D Zumbo
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2010-06-03

2.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Multiculturally Sensitive Mental Health Scale (MSMHS): development, factor analysis, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Ruth Chu-Lien Chao; Kathy E Green
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2011-04-25

4.  Validation of an electronic version of the Self-Awareness Questionnaire in English and Italian healthy samples.

Authors:  Laura Hughes; Sophie Betka; Mariachiara Longarzo
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale--Second Edition.

Authors:  Eric A Storch; Steven A Rasmussen; Lawrence H Price; Michael J Larson; Tanya K Murphy; Wayne K Goodman
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2010-06

6.  Rural parents' perceived stigma of seeking mental health services for their children: development and evaluation of a new instrument.

Authors:  Stacey L Williams; Jodi Polaha
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2014-04-21

7.  What range of trait levels can the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) measure reliably? An item response theory analysis.

Authors:  Aja Louise Murray; Tom Booth; Karen McKenzie; Renate Kuenssberg
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-08-24

8.  Assessment of depression in childhood and adolescence: an evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC).

Authors:  M E Faulstich; M P Carey; L Ruggiero; P Enyart; F Gresham
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Content validity exercises for nursing students.

Authors:  C T Beck
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.726

10.  How to assess and compare inter-rater reliability, agreement and correlation of ratings: an exemplary analysis of mother-father and parent-teacher expressive vocabulary rating pairs.

Authors:  Margarita Stolarova; Corinna Wolf; Tanja Rinker; Aenne Brielmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  CORRIGENDUM.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.035

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.