Literature DB >> 30734341

FDG PET/CT as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for the evaluation of marginal zone lymphoma.

Iuliana Vaxman1,2, Hanna Bernstine2,3, Geffen Kleinstern4, Natav Hendin2, Shai Shimony1,2, Liran Domachevsky2,3, Ronit Gurion1,2, David Groshar2,3, Pia Raanani1,2, Anat Gafter-Gvili2,5.   

Abstract

We evaluated the role of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography ([18F] FDG-PET) with computed tomography (CT) (PET/CT) as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in newly diagnosed marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) patients. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed MZL, treated with immunotherapy, chemotherapy regimens, surgery, or Helicobacter pylori eradication between 2008 and 2016 in a single tertiary center. Only patients who had a pretreatment PET/CT (P-PET/CT) were included. P-PET/CT, interim (I-PET/CT), and end-of-treatment PET/CT (E-PET/CT) studies were reviewed. P-PET/CT results were reported using two methods of evaluation, qualitative and semi quantitative: visual assessment (VAS) and maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and I-PET and E-PET results were reported by Deauville 5-point score (DS) evaluation as well. Avidity of PET/CT was defined as abnormal uptake in any of these methods. The primary outcome was the prognostic role of P-PET/CT, I-PET/CT, and E-PET/CT on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Data of 196 patients with MZL were identified, 110 of which had P-PET/CT and were included in this analysis. Median age was 67 years (range 18-93). The median follow-up period was 63 months (range 3-278). The median OS and PFS for the whole cohort were 63 (interquartile range 39-85) and 60 (interquartile range 37-76) months, respectively. The avidity of PET at baseline for the whole cohort was 70% (77/110 patients), for MALT lymphoma, 62.5% (40/64 patients), for NMZL, 76.4% (13/17 patients), and for SMZL, 82.7% (24/29 patients). When adjusted for IPI, sex, and comorbidities, positive E-PET/CT was associated with reduced PFS with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.4 (95% CI, 1.27-9.14, P = 0.02). Positive E-PET/CT did not correlate with OS. However, there were only three events. P-PET/CT was not predictive of PFS or OS. Our study demonstrates that above 70% of MZL are FDG avid. Positive E-PET/CT is a strong prognostic factor for PFS.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG-PET/CT; SUV; marginal zone lymphoma; prediction; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30734341     DOI: 10.1002/hon.2578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 0278-0232            Impact factor:   5.271


  5 in total

1.  The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosis and treatment evaluation for ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.

Authors:  Weifang Wang; Xiaochen Ni; Tianci Tang; Jie Wang; Yi Li; Xinmao Song
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The value of FDG PET/CT imaging in outcome prediction and response assessment of lymphoma patients treated with immunotherapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Zahra Kiamanesh; Narjess Ayati; Ramin Sadeghi; Eliza Hawkes; Sze Ting Lee; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  What Prognostic Markers Should Be Evaluated in Marginal Zone Lymphoma? A Survey Among Leading International Experts.

Authors:  Côme Bommier; Jérôme Lambert; Grzegorz Nowakowski; Emanuele Zucca; Catherine Thieblemont
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2022-01-31

4.  Is There a Role for [18F]FDG PET-CT in Staging MALT Lymphoma?

Authors:  Dan Cohen; Chava Perry; Shir Hazut-Krauthammer; Mikhail Kesler; Yair Herishanu; Efrat Luttwak; Einat Even-Sapir; Irit Avivi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in non-conjunctival origin ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas.

Authors:  Hye Lim Park; Joo Hyun O; Sonya Youngju Park; Seung-Eun Jung; Gyeongsin Park; Byung-Ock Choi; Sung Hoon Kim; Young-Woo Jeon; Seok-Goo Cho; Suk-Woo Yang
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.138

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.