Literature DB >> 30733931

Genetically engineered mouse models for studying radiation biology.

Katherine D Castle1, Mark Chen1,2, Amy J Wisdom1,2, David G Kirsch1,3.   

Abstract

Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) are valuable research tools that have transformed our understanding of cancer. The first GEMMs generated in the 1980s and 1990s were knock-in and knock-out models of single oncogenes or tumor suppressors. The advances that made these models possible catalyzed both technological and conceptual shifts in the way cancer research was conducted. As a result, dozens of mouse models of cancer exist today, covering nearly every tissue type. The advantages inherent to GEMMs compared to in vitro and in vivo transplant models are compounded in preclinical radiobiology research for several reasons. First, they accurately and robustly recapitulate primary cancers anatomically, histopathologically, and genetically. Reliable models are a prerequisite for predictive preclinical studies. Second, they preserve the tumor microenvironment, including the immune, vascular, and stromal compartments, which enables the study of radiobiology at a systems biology level. Third, they provide exquisite control over the genetics and kinetics of tumor initiation, which enables the study of specific gene mutations on radiation response and functional genomics in vivo. Taken together, these facets allow researchers to utilize GEMMs for rigorous and reproducible preclinical research. In the three decades since the generation of the first GEMMs of cancer, advancements in modeling approaches have rapidly progressed and expanded the mouse modeling toolbox with techniques such as in vivo short hairpin RNA (shRNA) knockdown, inducible gene expression, site-specific recombinases, and dual recombinase systems. Our lab and many others have utilized these tools to study cancer and radiobiology. Recent advances in genome engineering with CRISPR/Cas9 technology have made GEMMs even more accessible to researchers. Here, we review current and future approaches to mouse modeling with a focus on applications in preclinical radiobiology research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; Cre-loxP; RCAS-TVA; genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs); radiation biology

Year:  2017        PMID: 30733931      PMCID: PMC6363345          DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2017.06.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-676X            Impact factor:   1.241


  86 in total

Review 1.  The role of p53 in determining sensitivity to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Andrei V Gudkov; Elena A Komarova
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Combined activation of Ras and Akt in neural progenitors induces glioblastoma formation in mice.

Authors:  E C Holland; J Celestino; C Dai; L Schaefer; R E Sawaya; G N Fuller
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Intravascular HBO(2) saturations, perfusion and hypoxia in spontaneous and transplanted tumor models.

Authors:  B M Fenton; E M Lord; S F Paoni
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  Prospective therapeutic applications of p53 inhibitors.

Authors:  Andrei V Gudkov; Elena A Komarova
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  Gene targeting in mice: functional analysis of the mammalian genome for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Mario R Capecchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 6.  ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity.

Authors:  Yosef Shiloh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Genetically engineered models have advantages over xenografts for preclinical studies.

Authors:  Oren J Becher; Eric C Holland
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU) systematic overview of radiotherapy for cancer including a prospective survey of radiotherapy practice in Sweden 2001--summary and conclusions.

Authors:  Ulrik Ringborg; David Bergqvist; Bengt Brorsson; Eva Cavallin-Ståhl; Jeanette Ceberg; Nina Einhorn; Jan-Erik Frödin; Johannes Järhult; Gunilla Lamnevik; Christer Lindholm; Bo Littbrand; Anders Norlund; Urban Nylén; Måns Rosén; Hans Svensson; Torgil R Möller
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 9.  Radiation-induced heart disease: review of experimental data on dose response and pathogenesis.

Authors:  S Schultz-Hector
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Differences in vascular response between primary and transplanted tumours.

Authors:  S B Field; S Needham; I A Burney; R J Maxwell; J E Coggle; J R Griffiths
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Establishing the Impact of Vascular Damage on Tumor Response to High-Dose Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Katherine D Castle; David G Kirsch
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Targeting the ATM Kinase to Enhance the Efficacy of Radiotherapy and Outcomes for Cancer Patients.

Authors:  María E Guerra García; David G Kirsch; Zachary J Reitman
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.934

3.  Radiosensitizing the Vasculature of Primary Brainstem Gliomas Fails to Improve Tumor Response to Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Katherine Deland; Joshua S Mercer; Donna M Crabtree; Maria E Guerra Garcia; Michael Reinsvold; Lorraine Da Silva Campos; Nerissa T Williams; Lixia Luo; Yan Ma; Zachary J Reitman; Oren J Becher; David G Kirsch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Aging preclinical models in oncology field: from cells to aging.

Authors:  Wafa Bouleftour; Nicolas Magne
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 5.  The Roles of Autophagy and Senescence in the Tumor Cell Response to Radiation.

Authors:  Nipa H Patel; Sahib S Sohal; Masoud H Manjili; J Chuck Harrell; David A Gewirtz
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Tumor genotype dictates radiosensitization after Atm deletion in primary brainstem glioma models.

Authors:  Katherine Deland; Bryce F Starr; Joshua S Mercer; Jovita Byemerwa; Donna M Crabtree; Nerissa T Williams; Lixia Luo; Yan Ma; Mark Chen; Oren J Becher; David G Kirsch
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Progress of genome editing technology and developmental biology useful for radiation research.

Authors:  Kento Miura; Atsuo Ogura; Kohei Kobatake; Hiroaki Honda; Osamu Kaminuma
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Preclinical murine platform to evaluate therapeutic countermeasures against radiation-induced gastrointestinal syndrome.

Authors:  Paul B Romesser; Amanda S Kim; Jeho Jeong; Allison Mayle; Lukas E Dow; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 12.779

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.