Literature DB >> 30733897

Biomechanical Comparison of the Temporalis Muscle Fascia, the Fascia Lata, and the Dura Mater.

Mirjana Pukšec1, Damir Semenski2, Damir Ježek3, Mladen Brnčić3, Sven Karlović3, Antonia Jakovčević4, Goran Bosanac3, Martin Jurlina5.   

Abstract

The purpose of our research is to prove that elastic biomechanical characteristics of the temporalis muscle fascia are comparable to those of the fascia lata, which makes the temporalis muscle fascia adequate material for dural reconstruction in the region of the anterior cranial fossa. Fifteen fresh human cadavers, with age range from 33 to 83 years (median age: 64 years; mean age: 64.28 years), were included in the biomechanical study. Biomechanical stretching test with the comparison of elasticity among the tissues of the temporalis muscle fascia, the fascia lata, and the dura was performed. The samples were stretched up to the value of 6% of the total sample length and subsequently were further stretched to the maximum value of force. The value of extension at its elastic limit for the each sample was extrapolated from the force-extension curve and was 6.3% of the total sample length for the fascia lata (stress value of 14.61 MPa), 7.4% for the dura (stress value of 6.91 MPa), and 8% for the temporalis muscle fascia (stress value of 2.09 MPa). The dura and temporalis muscle fascia shared the same biomechanical behavior pattern up to the value of their elastic limit, just opposite to that of the fascia lata, which proved to be the stiffest among the three investigated tissues. There was a statistically significant difference in the extension of the samples at the value of the elastic limit for the fascia lata in comparison to the temporalis muscle fascia and the dura ( p  = 0.002; Kruskal-Wallis test). Beyond the value of elastic limit, the temporalis muscle fascia proved to be by far the most elastic tissue in comparison to the fascia lata and the dura. The value of extension at its maximum value of force for the each sample was extrapolated from the force-extension curve and was 9.9% of the sample's total length for the dura (stress value of 10.02 MPa), 11.2% for the fascia lata (stress value of 23.03 MPa), and 18.5% (stress value of 3.88 MPa) for the temporalis muscle fascia. There was a statistically significant difference in stress values at the maximum value of force between the dura and the temporalis muscle fascia ( p  = 0.001; Mann-Whitney U test) and between the dura and the fascia lata ( p  < 0.001; Mann-Whitney U test). Because of its elasticity and similarity in its mechanical behavior to the dura, the temporalis muscle fascia can be considered the most suitable tissue for dural reconstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dura mater; elasticity; free fascia lata graft; free temporalis muscle fascia graft; tensile test

Year:  2018        PMID: 30733897      PMCID: PMC6365232          DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1661349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  15 in total

1.  European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base.

Authors:  Valerie J Lund; Heinz Stammberger; Piero Nicolai; Paolo Castelnuovo; Tim Beal; Alfred Beham; Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen; Hannes Braun; Paola Cappabianca; Ricardo Carrau; Luigi Cavallo; George Clarici; Wolfwang Draf; Felice Esposito; Juan Fernandez-Miranda; Wytske Fokkens; Paul Gardner; Verena Gellner; Henrik Hellquist; Phillipe Hermann; Werner Hosemann; David Howard; Nick Jones; Mark Jorissen; Amin Kassam; Daniel Kelly; Senta Kurschel-Lackner; Samuel Leong; Nancy McLaughlin; Roberto Maroldi; Amir Minovi; Michael Mokry; Metin Onerci; Yew Kwang Ong; Daniel Prevedello; Hesham Saleh; Dharambir S Sehti; Daniel Simmen; Carl Snyderman; Auturo Solares; Magaret Spittle; Aldo Stamm; Peter Tomazic; Matteo Trimarchi; Frank Unger; Peter-John Wormald; Adam Zanation
Journal:  Rhinol Suppl       Date:  2010-06-01

2.  Skull base reconstruction after anterior subcranial tumor resection.

Authors:  Dan M Fliss; Ziv Gil; Sergey Spektor; Leonor Leider-Trejo; Avraham Abergel; Avi Khafif; Aharon Amir; Eyal Gur; Jacob T Cohen
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Reconstruction of the anterior skull base after craniofacial resection.

Authors:  J E Freije; J L Gluckman; H Vanloveren; J J McDonough; K A Shumrick
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1992

4.  How I do it: endoscopic-microscopic anterior skull base reconstruction.

Authors:  W Draf; B Schick
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2007-02

5.  Endoscopic Reconstruction of Cranial Base Defects following Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Carl H Snyderman; Amin B Kassam; Ricardo Carrau; Arlan Mintz
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2007-02

6.  Vascularised local and free flaps in anterior skull base reconstruction.

Authors:  Thomas K Hoffmann; Nicolai El Hindy; Oliver M Müller; Patrick J Schuler; Christoph Bergmann; Robert Hierner; Götz Lehnerdt; Stefan Mattheis; Martin Wagenmann; Jörg Schipper; Ulrich Sure; Stephan Lang; Daniel Hänggi; I Erol Sandalcioglu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  How to choose? Endoscopic skull base reconstructive options and limitations.

Authors:  Mihir R Patel; Michael E Stadler; Carl H Snyderman; Ricardo L Carrau; Amin B Kassam; Anand V Germanwala; Paul Gardner; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-11

8.  Quality of life following endonasal skull base surgery.

Authors:  Harshita Pant; Amol M Bhatki; Carl H Snyderman; Allan D Vescan; Ricardo L Carrau; Paul Gardner; Daniel Prevedello; Amin B Kassam
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-01

9.  Reconstruction of Skull Base and Fronto-orbital Defects following Tumor Resection.

Authors:  Kurt Laedrach; Anton Lukes; Joram Raveh
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2007-02

10.  A comprehensive algorithm for anterior skull base reconstruction after oncological resections.

Authors:  Ziv Gil; Avraham Abergel; Leonor Leider-Trejo; Avi Khafif; Nevo Margalit; Aharon Amir; Eyal Gur; Dan M Fliss
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2007-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Biomechanical characterization of human temporal muscle fascia in uniaxial tensile tests for graft purposes in duraplasty.

Authors:  Johann Zwirner; Benjamin Ondruschka; Mario Scholze; Gundula Schulze-Tanzil; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Management of Large Dural Defect with CSF Leak in Hypertelorism Correction.

Authors:  S M Balaji; C V Shankar Ganesh; Preetha Balaji
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.