| Literature DB >> 30733784 |
Sk Moquammel Haque1, Avijit Chakraborty1, Biswajit Ghosh1.
Abstract
Ledebouria revoluta are important ethnomedicinal plant found in India and South Africa. Micropropagation via indirect shoot organogenesis had been established from three types of explant (i.e. scale leaf, leaf lamina and root) of L. revoluta. Scale leaf was found superior as compared to leaf lamina and root explant with respect to their organogenic callus induction potentiality. Murashige and Skoog (1962) [MS] media supplemented with 3.0 mg L-1 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 0.75 mg L-1 β-naphthoxyacetic acid were best effective for inducing organogenic callus. Maximum 17.0 ± 0.52 bulblets were induced from about 500 mg of callus within 42-46 days sub-culturing on a medium containing 0.75 mg L-1 kinetin. The bulblets were matured (86.7% success) after one month culture on the same medium composition. The best result of in vitro root induction with 100% response and 8.4 ± 0.31 roots per bulb was achieved after 18 days of implantation on MS medium containing 2.0 mg L-1 indole-3-butyric acid. Plantlets were acclimatized with a 96.0% survival rate. Chromosomal studies revealed cytological stability of callus cells and all regenerants containing 2n = 30 chromosomes, same as parental plants. Antimicrobial activity of L. revoluta was tested against two Gram-positive bacteria, three Gram-negative bacteria and two fungi. The methanol and ethanol extract proved more effective against bacteria, whereas acetone and chloroform extract shows potential anti-fungal activities. Present protocol can be applied reliably to produce uniform planting materials in large scale. In addition, this efficient indirect regeneration pathway via callus culture opens a way for improvement through genetic transformation.Entities:
Keywords: 2,4-D, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid; 2iP, 6-(γ,γ-dimethylallylamino) purine; Anti-bacterial and anti-fungal activity; BAP, 6-benzylaminopurine; Callus cytology; IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; IBA, indole-3-butyric acid; KIN, kinetin; Ledebouria; MS, Murashige and Skoog (1962); Mitosis; NAA, α-naphthaleneacetic acid; NOA, β-naphthoxyacetic acid; PGRs, plant growth regulators; Scilla; Shoot organogenesis; TDZ, thidiazuron
Year: 2018 PMID: 30733784 PMCID: PMC6353769 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.05.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Genet Eng Biotechnol ISSN: 1687-157X
Effect of explant types and different auxins on callus induction of Ledebouria revoluta. [Data recorded after 8 weeks of culture.]
| PGRs (mg L–1) | Bulb scale explant | Leaf explant | Root explant | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,4-D | NOA | NAA | Explant response (%) | Callus growth | Explant response (%) | Callus growth | Explant response (%) | Callus growth |
| – | – | – | 0a | – | 0a | – | 0a | – |
| 1.0 | – | – | 25.6 ± 1.1bc | ++ | 23.3 ± 0.9b | + | 0a | – |
| 2.0 | – | – | 54.4 ± 1.1cd | +++ | 50.0 ± 1.1d | ++ | 25.6 ± 1.5bc | + |
| 3.0 | – | – | 62.2 ± 2.9c | +++ | 54.4 ± 1.7d | ++ | 30.0 ± 1.8c | ++ |
| 4.0 | – | – | 55.3 ± 1.0cd | +++ | 43.3 ± 1.2c | ++ | 23.3 ± 2.0b | + |
| 3.0 | 0.25 | – | 80.0 ± 1.9f | ++++ | 75.6 ± 1.7g | +++ | 50.0 ± 1.6gh | ++ |
| 3.0 | 0.50 | – | 90.0 ± 1.9fg | ++++++ | 83.3 ± 2.1h | +++++ | 54.4 ± 1.8hi | +++ |
| 3.0 | 0.75 | – | 94.5 ± 2.2g | ++++++ | 85.6 ± 2.0h | +++++ | 56.6 ± 2.3i | +++ |
| 3.0 | 1.0 | – | 83.3 ± 1.9efg | +++++ | 74.4 ± 2.4g | +++ | 46.6 ± 2.0fg | +++ |
| 3.0 | – | 0.25 | 75.6 ± 2.9ef | ++++ | 65.6 ± 1.9ef | +++ | 36.6 ± 1.8d | ++ |
| 3.0 | – | 0.5 | 84.4 ± 1.1efg | +++++ | 70.0 ± 1.2fg | +++ | 40.0 ± 2.2de | ++ |
| 3.0 | – | 0.75 | 80.0 ± 1.9f | +++++ | 75.3 ± 1.6g | ++++ | 45.5 ± 1.8efg | +++ |
| 3.0 | – | 1.0 | 72.2 ± 1.1ef | ++++ | 63.3 ± 1.3e | +++ | 42.2 ± 1.6def | ++ |
The increase in ‘+’ signs indicates a progressive induction and growth of the callus. Each value represents the mean ± standard error, n = 10 × 3 (3 sets, 10 samples in each set). Mean followed by the same letters in each column are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s multiple range tests.
Fig. 1In vitro regeneration of Ledebouria revoluta through callus mediated indirect shoot-organogenic pathway. (A) Root explants derived callus grown in 3.0 mg L−1 2,4-D plus 0.75 mg L−1 NOA (after 45 days of implantation). (B) Leaf derived callus grown in same medium composition (after 60 days of implantation). (C) Bulb scale derived callus in same medium composition (after 30 days of implantation). (D) Shoot induced from the surface of the callus cultured on MS medium containing 0.75 mg L−1 KIN alone after 42 days of implantation. (E) Maturation of unipolar shoots (or bulblets) on same medium after 70 days of inoculation. (F) Root induction of in vitro derived shoots after 18 days of implantation on MS medium containing 2.0 mg L−1 IBA (medium solidified with Phytagel®). (G) Tissue culture derived ex vitro plants in flowering stage after 14 months of field transfer.
Effect of different cytokinins on shoot (bulb) organogenesis from callus of Ledebouria revoluta. [Data recorded after 45 days of culture]
| Concentration of PGRs (mg L−1) | Explant response (%) | Number of shoot bulbs/500 mg callus | Number of embryos/500 mg callus | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIN | BAP | 2iP | TDZ | |||
| – | – | – | – | 0a | – | – |
| 0.10 | – | – | – | 0a | – | – |
| 0.25 | – | – | – | 33.3 ± 0.55c | 5.7 ± 0.43b | 0a |
| 0.50 | – | – | – | 56.7 ± 0.63f | 10.6 ± 0.60d | 0a |
| 0.75 | – | – | – | 73.3 ± 0.85g | 17.0 ± 0.52g | 0a |
| 1.00 | – | – | – | 70.0 ± 0.72g | 0a | 15.3 ± 0.75e |
| – | 0.10 | – | – | 0a | – | – |
| – | 0.25 | – | – | 0a | – | – |
| – | 0.50 | – | – | 0a | – | – |
| – | 0.75 | – | – | 30.0 ± 0.82bc | 0 a | 6.6 ± 0.31c |
| – | 1.00 | – | – | 40.0 ± 0.95d | 0 a | 10.8 ± 0.43d |
| – | – | 0.10 | – | 0a | – | – |
| – | – | 0.25 | – | 0a | – | – |
| – | – | 0.50 | – | 46.7 ± 0.65e | 7.6 ± 0.57c | 0a |
| – | – | 0.75 | – | 60.0 ± 0.54f | 14.4 ± 0.45e | 0a |
| – | – | 1.00 | – | 60.0 ± 0.73f | 12.8 ± 0.31f | 0a |
| – | – | – | 0.10 | 0a | – | – |
| – | – | – | 0.25 | 0a | – | – |
| – | – | – | 0.50 | 26.7 ± 0.75b | 0 a | 4.5 ± 0.30b |
| – | – | – | 0.75 | 40.0 ± 0.88d | 0 a | 8.2 ± 0.36c |
| – | – | – | 1.00 | 46.7 ± 1.04e | 0 a | 13.4 ± 0.47e |
Each value represents the mean ± standard error, n = 10 × 3 (3 sets, 10 samples in each set). Mean followed by the same letters in each column are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s multiple range tests.
Effect of different auxins on root induction of Ledebouria revoluta. [Data recorded after 18 days of culture.]
| Concentration of auxins (mg L−1) | Explant response (%) | Number of roots/bulblet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IAA | IBA | ||
| – | – | 63.3 ± 1.45d | 3.9 ± 0.32abc |
| 1.0 | – | 70.0 ± 0.93de | 4.4 ± 0.21abc |
| 2.0 | – | 76.7 ± 0.65ef | 4.9 ± 0.25bc |
| 3.0 | – | 80.0 ± 0.86f | 5.7 ± 0.18cd |
| 4.0 | – | 66.7 ± 1.05d | 4.0 ± 0.22abc |
| – | 1.0 | 100 ± 0.00g | 5.6 ± 0.20cd |
| – | 2.0 | 100 ± 0.00g | 8.4 ± 0.31e |
| – | 3.0 | 100 ± 0.00g | 7.5 ± 0.34e |
| – | 4.0 | 93.3 ± 1.33g | 4.8 ± 0.23bc |
Each value represents the mean ± standard error, n = 10 × 3 (3 sets, 10 samples in each set). Mean followed by the same letters in each column are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s multiple range tests.
Fig. 2Mitotic metaphase plate of Ledebouria revoluta showing 2n = 30 chromosomes. (A) parental plant, (B) callus cell, (C) in vitro plant, (D) tissue culture derived field-grown ex vitro plant.
Antimicrobial activity of tissue culture derived ex vitro plants of Ledebouria revoluta.
| Type and concentration of extract | Zone of Inhibition (mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram positive bacteria | Gram negative bacteria | Fungus | ||||||
| Solvent type | mg/cup | MTCC 441 | MTCC 3160 | MTCC 109 | MTCC 443 | MTCC 3542 | MTCC 277 | MTCC 10,726 |
| Ethanol | 0.75 | – | 13 ± 0.88 | 15 ± 0.58 | – | – | R | R |
| 1.5 | 9 ± 0.58 | 15 ± 0.58 | 17 ± 0.33 | – | – | R | R | |
| 3.0 | 10 ± 0.47 | 17 ± 0.47 | 17 ± 0.47 | 12 ± 0.58 | – | R | R | |
| 4.5 | 11 ± 0.33 | 19 ± 0.33 | 17 ± 0.33 | 13 ± 0.47 | 14 ± 0.58 | R | R | |
| 6.0 | 11 ± 0.33 | 19 ± 0.33 | 17 ± 0.33 | 13 ± 0.33 | 17 ± 0.33 | R | R | |
| Methanol | 0.75 | 8 ± 0.88 | 11 ± 0.58 | 13 ± 0.88 | 11 ± 0.58 | 13 ± 0.58 | R | R |
| 1.5 | 10 ± 0.58 | 13 ± 0.47 | 15 ± 0.53 | 12 ± 0.88 | 15 ± 0.88 | R | R | |
| 3.0 | 12 ± 0.47 | 15 ± 0.88 | 16 ± 0.33 | 14 ± 0.58 | 17 ± 0.47 | R | R | |
| 4.5 | 12 ± 0.33 | 16 ± 0.33 | 16 ± 0.33 | 14 ± 0.47 | 17 ± 0.33 | R | R | |
| 6.0 | 12 ± 0.33 | 16 ± 0.47 | 16 ± 0.47 | 14 ± 0.33 | 17 ± 0.33 | R | R | |
| Acetone | 0.75 | – | 11 ± 0.47 | – | – | – | R | 17 ± 0.88 |
| 1.5 | – | 13 ± 0.58 | 10 ± 0.88 | 10 ± 0.58 | – | R | 21 ± 0.47 | |
| 3.0 | 8 ± 0.58 | 12 ± 0.58 | 12 ± 0.47 | 12 ± 0.47 | – | R | 23 ± 0.33 | |
| 4.5 | 9 ± 0.88 | 16 ± 0.33 | 13 ± 0.33 | 13 ± 0.33 | 10 ± 0.58 | R | 23 ± 0.33 | |
| 6.0 | 10 ± 0.47 | 16 ± 0.33 | 13 ± 0.33 | 13 ± 0.33 | 13 ± 0.47 | R | 23 ± 0.33 | |
| Chloroform | 0.75 | – | 10 ± 0.58 | – | – | 10 ± 0.58 | R | 13 ± 0.88 |
| 1.5 | – | 12 ± 0.58 | 08 ± 0.47 | – | 12 ± 0.47 | R | 19 ± 0.58 | |
| 3.0 | – | 14 ± 0.88 | 11 ± 0.58 | 8 ± 0.58 | 14 ± 0.47 | R | 22 ± 0.47 | |
| 4.5 | 9 ± 0.58 | 15 ± 0.47 | 14 ± 0.88 | 10 ± 0.47 | 14 ± 0.33 | R | 22 ± 0.33 | |
| 6.0 | 11 ± 0.33 | 15 ± 0.33 | 16 ± 0.47 | 10 ± 0.33 | 14 ± 0.33 | R | 22 ± 0.33 | |
| DMSO | 50 µl | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Experiment repeats 3 times and each value represents the mean ± standard error. [R – Resistant; MTCC 441 – Bacillus subtilis; MTCC 3160 – Staphylococcus aureus; MTCC 109 - Klebsiella pneumoniae; MTCC 443 - Escherichia coli; MTCC 3542 - Pseudomonas aeruginosa; MTCC 277 – Aspergillus flavus; MTCC 10,726 – Fusarium verticillioides.]
Fig. 3Antimicrobial activities of Ledebouria revoluta (A, Acetone extract; C, Chloroform extract; M, Methanol extract; E, Ethanol extract). (A) Staphylococcus aureus [Gram positive bacteria], (B) Pseudomonas aeruginosa [Gram negative bacteria]. (C) Fusarium verticillioides [fungus]. *bar = 25 mm.
Fig. 4Comparative antimicrobial activities of in vivo and ex vitro raised plants of Ledebouria revoluta against standard bacterial strains (MTCC 441, 3160, 109, 443, 3542) and standard fungal strains (MTCC 277 and 10726). *Results of ethanol extract against bacteria and acetone extract against fungus are presented here.