Literature DB >> 30733761

Increased level of B cell differentiation factor in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

Hala Zaki Raslan1, Hiba Sibaii2, Salwa Refat El-Zayat2, Hagar Hassan2, Mahitab El-Kassaby2.   

Abstract

Most autoimmune disease are driven by a dysfunction in T and B cells, but B cells are still an interesting area of research, perturbations in their development are implicated in autoimmune diseases. B cell differentiating factor (BCDF) plays a part in the differentiation of B cells. The aim was To assess the levels of BCDF, IgM and IgG in SLE patients and whether they have any peculiarity in the clinical context of SLE. Thirty six patients with SLE and 24 healthy volunteers as control were enrolled in the study. BCDF was measured using Sandwich ELISA, total human IgM and IgG were measured by calorimetric methods. The mean concentrations of BCDF and IgM were significantly higher in patients with SLE as compared with controls (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001 respectively). No significant difference was observed as regard IgG. We observed positive correlation between BCDF and IgM (r = 0.281, P = 0.03), and between IgG and IgM, duration of the disease (r = 0.468, P = 0.004, r = 0.337, P = 0.008 respectively). Moreover we observed lower IgM level in patients with discoid lesion (P = 0.009) and lower IgG level in those with hematologic manifestations (P = 0.02). ROC analysis revealed area under curve (AUC) 0.861 for BCDF and 0.902 for IgM, they can delineate SLE from controls at a cut-off value of 98.5 pg/ml, and 18 mg/dl IgM respectively.
CONCLUSION: BCDF and IgM are increased in SLE patients and are promissing diagnostic markers for SLE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCDF; IgG; IgM; SLE

Year:  2018        PMID: 30733761      PMCID: PMC6353854          DOI: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Eng Biotechnol        ISSN: 1687-157X


Introduction

A high proportion of patients display autoimmune features [1]. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by different clinical manifestations [2]. Molecules responsible for tissue damage and affected sites are antibodies that are directed against a large numbers of self-antigens. These pathogenic autoantibodies are produced from autoreactive B cells [3]. The disease is driven by a loss of immune tolerance and abnormal B- and T- cell function [4]. Jackson et al., stated that B cells have been recognized for their importance for lupus pathogenesis because of their production of pathogenic antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and that dysregulation in B cell signaling was implicated in the initiation of systemic autoimmunity [5]. B cell may proliferate without secreting immunoglobulin (Ig) [6] its differentiation depends on the presence of B cell differentiation factor [6], [7], [8]. The role of immunoglobulin isotypes has attracted attention in many human autoimmune diseases [9] where many isotypes of autoantibodies can be detected. The IgG anti-dsDNA isotype is largely studied in SLE patients [10] because of their pathogenic role but, the behavior of the IgM anti-dsDNA isotype has been a matter of polemic [11]. Human self-reactive natural IgM antibodies are common in health and disease and can play fundamental roles in tissue homeostasis and the maintenance of immune equilibrium. High levels of IgM and IgG autoantibodies was observed to be associated with many autoimmune diseases [12]. Recently, we found increase serum BCDF in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [13]. Because of the clinical heterogeneity of SLE and the lack of pathogenomonic tests we aim to assess the levels of BCDF, IgM and IgG in SLE patients and whether they have any peculiarity in the clinical context of SLE.

Subjects and methods

1Patients

Thirty six patients with SLE who fulfilled the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) criteria for SLE [14] followed up at rheumatology outpatient clinic of the center of excellence at National Research Centre Cairo- Egypt, participated in the study. They were 32 (88.9%) females, and 4 (11.1%) males, mean age was 32.2 ± 10.4 years with duration ranged from one to 20 years with mean: 8.92 ± 5.7 years. Twenty-four apparently healthy individuals, 21 (87.5%) females, and 3 (12.5%) males, mean age: 39.3 ± 1.6 years were used as controls. Patients and controls were subjected to detailed medical history and assessment of BCDF, IgM and IgG. We excluded any patients with autoimmune diseases other than SLE, concurrent infection, or malignancy. Lupus disease activity was assessed by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) [15]. The study was approved by the ethical committee of National Research Centre according to the ethical standards established by the Declaration of Helsinki and an informed consent was taken from each participant in the study.

Laboratory tests

Blood sampling

Five millimeter of blood were withdrawn from all subjects and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. Sera were isolated and stored at −80 until the determination of laboratory investigations.

Biochemical assays

Serum levels of BCDF, was measured using a commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay ELISA kit, produced by Glory Science Co., Ltd. 2400 Veterans Blvd. Suite 16–101, Del Rio, TX 78840, USA. www.glorybioscience.com. Quantitative determination of total human IgM and IgG were measured by colorimetric kinetic method produced by Chronolab systems, S.L., C/Aragon, 271,6 planta,08007 Barcelona, Spain www. All these analysis were performed at NRC, medical physiology department.

Statistical analysis

The study analysis was carried out using statistical package for social science (spss) version 16 IBM, Chicago IL, U.S.A statistical software The statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 and the significant difference between the two groups was determined by using independent “t” test expressed as mean ± SE, Pearson correlation was used to analyze the correlation between different variables. For the evaluation of the diagnostic performance of BCDF, IgM and IgG, we used a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The curve was constructed to show their sensitivity and specificity at different decision cut-off levels. In this type of curve, the x-axis represents the false-positive rate (1-specificity). The y-axis represents the true- positive rate (sensitivity). The best cut-off is the nearest point to the upper left corner. Area under the curve was constructed to determine the overall performance of the test.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics of SLE patients

Thirty-six SLE patients participated in the study their disease duration ranged from one to 20 years with mean: 8.92 ± 5.7 years, SLEDAI ranged from 4 to 41, mean: 20.58 ± 1.61. Clinical data of the SLE patients are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical data of SLE patients.

Manifestations of SLEn (%)
Oral ulcers19 (52.8%)
Malar rash21 (58.3%)
Photosensitivity17 (47.2%)
Discoid rash3 (8.8%)
Maculo-Papular rash9 (26.5%)
Alopecia21 (58.3%)
Arthritis28 (77.8%)
Vasculitis14 (38.9%)
Serositis8 (22.2%)
Renal (nephrotic nephritic)16 (44.4%)
Neurologic (psychosis, depression, seizures, headache)11 (30.6%)
Haematology (anemia, lymphopenia)7 (19.4%)
Total number of patients n = 3636 (100%)
Clinical data of SLE patients. Mean values of BCDF and IgM were significantly higher in SLE patients compared to controls P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001 respectively. However IgG did not show significant difference between SLE patients and controls (Table 2).
Table 2

BCDF, IgM and IgG in SLE patients and controls.

ParametersSLE patients (n = 36)Controls (n = 24)P value
BCDF, pg/ml201.9 ± 25.8105.1 ± 9.2p < 0.001*
IgM, mg/dl60.9 ± 6.619.8 ± 2.6p < 0.0001**
IgG, mg/dl135.5 ± 11.4132.5 ± 4.9p = 0.5

p significant.

p highly significant, BCDF: B cell differentiating factor.

BCDF, IgM and IgG in SLE patients and controls. p significant. p highly significant, BCDF: B cell differentiating factor.

Relation of BCDF, IgM and IgG to clinical and laboratory data of SLE patients

Pearson correlation test was used to assess the correlations between BCDF, IgM IgG, age, duration of the disease and SLEDAI. There was significant positive correlation beween BCDF and IgM (r = 0.281, p = 0.03) (Fig. 1) and between IgG and duration of the disease, IgM (r = 0.468, p = 0.004; r = 0.337, p = 0.008, respectively) (Figs. 2, 3.). No significant correlation was found with SLEDAI (see Figs. 4, 5).
Fig. 1

Positive correlation between. BCDF and IgM (r = 0.281,p = 0.03).

Fig. 2

Positive Correlation between IgG and duration of disease (r = 0.468, p = 0.004).

Fig. 3

Positive Correlation correlation between IgG and IgM. (r = 0.337, p = 0.008).

Fig. 4

ROC curve of BCDF in SLE patients.

Fig. 5

ROC curve of IgM in SLE patients.

Positive correlation between. BCDF and IgM (r = 0.281,p = 0.03). Positive Correlation between IgG and duration of disease (r = 0.468, p = 0.004). Positive Correlation correlation between IgG and IgM. (r = 0.337, p = 0.008). ROC curve of BCDF in SLE patients. ROC curve of IgM in SLE patients. We investigated the relation between BCDF, IgM, IgG and any of the clinical manifestation, we found that IgM was significantly lower in SLE patients with discoid lupus compared to SLE patients without discoid lesion. Moreover, IgG was significantly lower in SLE patients with hematological manifestations compared to those without hematological manifestations (Table 3, Table 4).
Table 3

Mean BCDF level in different clinical manifestations of SLE patients.

Manifestations of SLEMean ± SE of BCDF (pg/ml)
P value
SLE patients with manifestationSLE patients without manifestation
Renal182.6 ± 22.7217.4 ± 42.90.48
Neurologic149.5 ± 20.7225 ± 35.20.07
Oral167 ± 19.8240.3 ± 490.18
Arthritis208.4 ± 31.9179.2 ± 32.10.52
Vasculitis162 ± 20.2227 ± 39.60.15
Malar rash167.0 ± 18.6250.2 ± 54.80.17
Photosens151.6 ± 17.6241.6 ± 44.80.09
Discoid rash191 ± 46.9209.6 ± 29.30.75
Maculopapular rash187.4 ± 29.7215.4 ± 35.20.54
Cutaneous171 ± 26.3215 ± 35.20.32
Alopecia162.3 ± 17.1257 ± 54.90.11
Serositis260 ± 98185 ± 18.60.47
Haematology155 ± 27213 ± 310.18

SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus,

* p significant

Table 4

Mean IgM and IgG levels in different clinical manifestations of SLE patients.

Manifestations of SLEMean ± SE of IgM (mg/dl)
P valueMean ± SE of IgG (mg/dl)
P value
SLE patients with manifestationSLE patients without manifestationSLE patients with manifestationSLE patients without manifestation
Renal68.2 ± 10.155 ± 8.60.32119.7 ± 18.4148 ± 140.22
Neurologic60.0 ± 11.361.0 ± 8.10.92127.0 ± 18.9138.0 ± 14.30.64
Oral61.2 ± 9.360.5 ± 9.40.95144.0 ± 15.0125.0 ± 17.50.43
Arthritis65.5 ± 7.744.8 ± 10.60.13141 ± 13.2115 ± 21.70.31
Vasculitis55.6 ± 9.164.2 ± 9.00.50114 ± 15.6148 ± 15.30.13
Malar rash63.0 ± 8.9358.0 ± 9.840.70142 ± 14.5126 ± 18.50.50
Photosens62.2 ± 9.159.7 ± 9.50.85146.8 ± 15.3125.4 ± 16.70.35
Discoid rash38.6 ± 2.459.3 ± 7.020.009*102 ± 28137.5 ± 12.60.33
Mp rash44.2 ± 9.662.3 ± 7.980.16117 ± 23.4140 ± 13.70.41
Cutaneous57.8 ± 11.9362.3 ± 7.980.75124 ± 20.8140 ± 13.70.53
Alopecia50.7 ± 7.5375.1 ± 10.90.08144 ± 13.4123 ± 200.40
Serositis66.6 ± 15.459.2 ± 7.300.67157 ± 28.9129.0 ± 12.10.39
Haematology60 ± 15.161.1 ± 7.390.9476.1 ± 24149 ± 11.50.02*

SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus.

P significant.

Mean BCDF level in different clinical manifestations of SLE patients. SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus, * p significant Mean IgM and IgG levels in different clinical manifestations of SLE patients. SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus. P significant.

Value of BCDF, IgM as diagnostic markers in SLE patients

We performed ROC curve analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of BCDF and IgM. We found that BCDF can discriminate SLE patients from healthy volunteers at cut-off value of 98.5 pg/ml with sensitivity 80.6%, specificity 70.8% and area under curve (AUC) 0.861 (p < 0.001, 95%CI 0.765–0.956), and IgM can discriminate SLE patients from healthy volunteers at cut-off value of 18 mg/dl with sensitivity 97.2%, specificity 87.5% and AUC of 0.902(p < 0.001, 95%CI 0.806–0.998).

Discussion

B cell hyperactivity have several roles and represents a central feature in the development of SLE [16] and its pathogenesis [17] via production of pathogenic immunoglobulin [18]. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study assessing the level of BCDF in SLE patients and its relation to IgM and IgG and clinical manifestations of SLE. Our findings revealed that levels of B cell differentiating factor (BCDF) were higher in SLE patients compared to healthy controls and no difference in IgG between patients and controls. This may suggest that BCDF differentiate to produce more IgM than IgG. A recent study released by Shaikh and colleagues., revealed that SLE is caused by a loss of immune tolerance and abnormal B and T cell function . Hirano and colleagues proposed that BCDF induces the differentiation of B cells into Ig-secreting cells [6]. This was explained by Kikutani, who suggested that BCDF induces an increase in the level of mRNA specific for secretory heavy chains, and then induces the final maturation of B cells into immunoglobulin-secreting cells [8]. Later Huang and colleagues speculated that B cell may express receptors for BCDF, in addition they observed that BCDF stimulates a rapid rise in intracellular calcium which is an important event in the terminal differentiation of B cell mediated by BCDF [19]. This let us to deduce that the increase of BCDF explains why B cell represents a central feature of SLE. SLE patients are characterized by the presence of high levels of circulating IgM and IgG autoantibodies [7], [20] this was supported by a recent study postulated that the serum of SLE patients induces the normal B cell to secrete autoantibodies [21]. In our study there was a significant increase of IgM in SLE patients in agreement with the findings of Jost and colleagues [22], moreover we found a direct correlation between BCDF and IgM which let us deduce that the increase of BCDF in SLE patients enhances the maturation of B cell and hence the secretion of immunoglobulin IgM. On the contrary to IgM, we did not find a significant difference in IgG levels between patients and controls, which could be attributed to the importance of IgM in the containment of disease, where IgM autoantibodies could decrease the IgG autoantibody production by autoreactive B- cells [22], [23], [24]. Another study suggested that natural IgM may have protective properties in autoimmunity [25], this was explained by Boes and colleagues [26] who suggested that secreted IgM may lessen the severity of autoimmune pathology associated with IgG autoantibodies, they observed that mice without the ability to produce IgM have a predisposition for development of pathogenic IgG autoantibodies specific for double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and histones and suffered from more severe lupus-like autoimmunity and glomerulonephritis. Another study revealed that IgM can induce specific anti-inflammatory signaling pathway that depends on the phosphatase mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) in dendritic cells derived from bone marrow [27] and block the pro-inflammatory influences of lupus- associated RNA or DNA IgG immune complexes in SLE patients [12]. IgM is a potent activator of complement that promotes the removal of autoantigens and reduces the chance of autoreactive B cells to be activated [28]. Deficiency in secreted IgM has the same effect on IgG antibody responses to both foreign antigens and self-antigens as deficiency in complement components [29] indicating that secreted IgM may affect the development of IgG autoantibodies and autoimmune disease through the same pathways as complement components, these IgM antibody responses are highly inducible and their up-regulation can be a powerful means for the host to survive in a setting of chronic inflammation [25]. IgM protects against autoimmunity by inducing B cell tolerance when there is too much autoreactive IgM, autoantibody response may be dominant, such as in the advanced stage of SLE [30]. In addition there was a direct correlation between IgG and IgM because BCDF induced the maturation of B cell, and increased the immunoglobulin levels [19]. B cell may proliferate without secreting Ig but in the presence of BCDF biosynthesis of immunoglobulin will increase [19]. We found a direct correlation between IgG and the duration of disease supporting the early finding of Saiki [31], as IgG antibodies appear with disease progression [32] and the levels of IgG autoantibodies to dsDNA in serum are known to fluctuate with disease activity in SLE and they often increase prior to the flaring of disease activity [33]. Although, most of the SLE patients in our study have high disease activity the IgG was not elevated which may be due to the higher IgM that has negative effect on the production of IgG [24]. When we tested for the presence of any association between BCDF, IgM, IgG and any of the clinical manifestation of SLE, we found lower IgM in SLE patients with discoid lupus compared to other SLE patients and lower IgG in SLE patients with hematologic manifestation compared to other SLE patients Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) occurs in 25% of SLE patients [34], it has been postulated that IgM autoantibodies could decrease IgG autoantibody production by autoreactive B cells, and act as competitive inhibitors with their IgG counterparts by binding to the same circulating nuclear antigens [23], [24] where these mechanisms may be important in preventing the systemic spread in DLE patients [22]. Hematologic manifestations are identified in 10–83% of SLE. In the present study, we found lower IgG in SLE patients with hematologic manifestation [35]. In contrast to our study, Liu and colleagues [36] found that IgG fractions in the sera of active SLE patients acquire a suppressive effect on haematopoietic progenitor cells. Thus, IgG autoantibodies to primitive haematopoietic progenitor cells are demonstrated to be present in the sera of a significant proportion of active SLE patients with anaemia and leukocytopenia and to suppress the progenitor cell growth this could be attributed to the low number of patients with hematologic manifestations which make the statistical comparison unfair. We assessed the diagnostic performance of BCDF and IgM and we found that they are promising diagnostic markers in SLE as the ROC curve analysis of BCDFand IgM showed AUC 0.861 and 0.902 respectively. BCDF at cut-off 98.5 pg/ml is can discriminate SLE patients from healthy individuals with sensitivity 80.6%, specificity 70.8% and also IgM can discriminate SLE patients from healthy volunteers at cut-off value of 18 mg/dl with sensitivity 97.2%, specificity 87.5% .

Conclusion

We observed increased levels of BCDF, IgM in SLE patients in comparison to healthy controls. The increased levels of BCDF may be the cause of the expansion of autoreactive B cell clones leading to the increase of IgM. This might reopen a field of interest in BCDF and its clinical association with SLE. BCDF and total human IgM are promising diagnostic markers for SLE.

Funding

There was no funding.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

Author one: Hala Zaki Raslan, Author two: Hiba Sibaii, Author three:Salwa Refat El-Zayat, Author four: Hagar Hassan, Author five: Mahitab El- Kassaby, declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants (Ethical approval)

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional (National Research Centre) committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
  35 in total

1.  Accelerated development of IgG autoantibodies and autoimmune disease in the absence of secreted IgM.

Authors:  M Boes; T Schmidt; K Linkemann; B C Beaudette; A Marshak-Rothstein; J Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE.

Authors:  C Bombardier; D D Gladman; M B Urowitz; D Caron; C H Chang
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1992-06

3.  Progression of lupus-like disease drives the appearance of complement-activating IgG antibodies in MRL/lpr mice.

Authors:  Krisztián Papp; Péter Végh; Andrey Tchorbanov; Tchavdar Vassilev; Anna Erdei; József Prechl
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 4.  "A rose is a rose is a rose," but CVID is Not CVID common variable immune deficiency (CVID), what do we know in 2011?

Authors:  Patrick F K Yong; James E D Thaventhiran; Bodo Grimbacher
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.543

5.  Lupus-specific kidney deposits of HSP90 are associated with altered IgG idiotypic interactions of anti-HSP90 autoantibodies.

Authors:  A Kenderov; V Minkova; D Mihailova; N Giltiay; S Kyurkchiev; I Kehayov; M Kazatchkine; S Kaveri; A Pashov
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  IgM antibodies against dsDNA in SLE.

Authors:  Torsten Witte
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 7.  The role of collagen antibodies in mediating arthritis.

Authors:  Merrill J Rowley; Kutty Selva Nandakumar; Rikard Holmdahl
Journal:  Mod Rheumatol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.023

8.  Lupus erythematosus in the 1980s: a survey of 570 patients.

Authors:  M Pistiner; D J Wallace; S Nessim; A L Metzger; J R Klinenberg
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 9.  The role of B cells in lupus pathogenesis.

Authors:  Emil Nashi; YingHua Wang; Betty Diamond
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 5.085

Review 10.  The use of laboratory tests in diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Renato Alberto Sinico; Bruna Bollini; Ettore Sabadini; Luca Di Toma; Antonella Radice
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.902

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Molecular Markers Towards Potential Diagnostic Panels for Lupus.

Authors:  Gongjun Tan; Binila Baby; Yuqiu Zhou; Tianfu Wu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 7.561

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.